@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref31817,
author = {Fei Zhao and Ya Ping Chen and Yasaman Salmaki and Bryan T. Drew and Trevor C. Wilson and Anne-Cathrine Scheen and Ferhat Celep and Christian Br?uchler and Mika Bendiksby and Qiang Wang and Hua Peng and Richard G. Olmstead and Bo Li and Chunlei Xiang},
title = {An updated tribal classification of Lamiaceae based on plastome phylogenomics},
year = {2021},
keywords = {Lamiaceae, Lamioideae, Mints, Phylogenomics, Tribal relationships},
doi = {10.1186/s12915-020-00931-z},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {BMC Biology},
volume = {19},
number = {},
pages = {2},
abstract = {Background: A robust molecular phylogeny is fundamental for developing a stable classification and providing a
solid framework to understand patterns of diversification, historical biogeography, and character evolution. As the
sixth largest angiosperm family, Lamiaceae, or the mint family, consitutes a major source of aromatic oil, wood,
ornamentals, and culinary and medicinal herbs, making it an exceptionally important group ecologically,
ethnobotanically, and floristically. The lack of a reliable phylogenetic framework for this family has thus far hindered
broad-scale biogeographic studies and our comprehension of diversification. Although significant progress has
been made towards clarifying Lamiaceae relationships during the past three decades, the resolution of a
phylogenetic backbone at the tribal level has remained one of the greatest challenges due to limited availability of
genetic data.
Results: We performed phylogenetic analyses of Lamiaceae to infer relationships at the tribal level using 79
protein-coding plastid genes from 175 accessions representing 170 taxa, 79 genera, and all 12 subfamilies. Both
maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses yielded a more robust phylogenetic hypothesis relative to previous
studies and supported the monophyly of all 12 subfamilies, and a classification for 22 tribes, three of which are
newly recognized in this study. As a consequence, we propose an updated phylogenetically informed tribal
classification for Lamiaceae that is supplemented with a detailed summary of taxonomic history, generic and
species diversity, morphology, synapomorphies, and distribution for each subfamily and tribe.
Conclusions: Increased taxon sampling conjoined with phylogenetic analyses based on plastome sequences has
provided robust support at both deep and shallow nodes and offers new insights into the phylogenetic
relationships among tribes and subfamilies of Lamiaceae. This robust phylogenetic backbone of Lamiaceae will
serve as a framework for future studies on mint classification, biogeography, character evolution, and diversification}
}
You have reached this page using a special URL that is intended to be used
by journal editors and reviewers or referees of a paper that is under
consideration for publication. This URL gives you access to the submitted
data and metadata associated with analyses and results presented in the
paper under review. Please carefully examine the data paying special
attention to the following:
The citation data (authors, year, citation, abstract) should be
complete, except for information that is not yet known (e.g. volume or
page numbers).
Verify that nexus files are error-free and executable by software
programs (e.g. PAUP, Mesquite, MacClade, etc). Please make sure that the
taxon labels for trees are identical, or a subset of, the taxon labels in
data matrices connected by way of an analysis. If taxon labels in trees do
not match with taxon labels in associated data matrices, the data will not
be useful to the scientific community.
Verify that data are not missing and that opportunities to supply
valuable metadata are not overlooked. For example, TreeBASE can store
Genbank accession numbers, museum voucher IDs, latitude and longitudes for
specimen localities, character names and character state names for
morphological data, etc. Including these metadata are sometimes overlooked
by submitting authors, yet sharing this metadata is extremely valuable to
the scientific community. Please use your power as a reviewer to encourage
the sharing of richly-annotated metadata.
Verify that analyses are not missing and that, where possible, analysis
entries include software commands (e.g. the contents of a PAUP block or
MrBayes block) so that analyses can be replicated easily (e.g. commands
that describe substitution models, data partitions, and heuristic search
parameters).
Verify that taxon labels are mapped against TreeBASE's taxonomic
dictionary. Data in TreeBASE can only be found using a taxon name search if
the taxon labels are properly mapped.
By clicking the 'OK' button below, you agree to keep these data
confidential; you agree not to retain these data after completing your report
to the journal editor; you agree not to use these data or knowledge of these
data for the purposes of your research until and unless the paper under
review has been published and the data have been made available to the
general public; you agree to keep the URL confidential.
Citation title: "An updated tribal classification of Lamiaceae based on plastome phylogenomics".
Study name: "An updated tribal classification of Lamiaceae based on plastome phylogenomics".
This study is part of submission 26639
(Status: Published).
Citation
Zhao F., Chen Y.P., Salmaki Y., Drew B.T., Wilson T.C., Scheen A., Celep F., Br?uchler C., Bendiksby M., Wang Q., Peng H., Olmstead R., Li B., & Xiang C. 2021. An updated tribal classification of Lamiaceae based on plastome phylogenomics. BMC Biology, 19: 2.
Authors
Zhao F.
Chen Y.P.
Salmaki Y.
Drew B.T.
Wilson T.C.
Scheen A.
+4799566056
Celep F.
Br?uchler C.
Bendiksby M.
+4773592287
Wang Q.
Peng H.
Olmstead R.
Li B.
Xiang C.
+871 5223506
Abstract
Background: A robust molecular phylogeny is fundamental for developing a stable classification and providing a
solid framework to understand patterns of diversification, historical biogeography, and character evolution. As the
sixth largest angiosperm family, Lamiaceae, or the mint family, consitutes a major source of aromatic oil, wood,
ornamentals, and culinary and medicinal herbs, making it an exceptionally important group ecologically,
ethnobotanically, and floristically. The lack of a reliable phylogenetic framework for this family has thus far hindered
broad-scale biogeographic studies and our comprehension of diversification. Although significant progress has
been made towards clarifying Lamiaceae relationships during the past three decades, the resolution of a
phylogenetic backbone at the tribal level has remained one of the greatest challenges due to limited availability of
genetic data.
Results: We performed phylogenetic analyses of Lamiaceae to infer relationships at the tribal level using 79
protein-coding plastid genes from 175 accessions representing 170 taxa, 79 genera, and all 12 subfamilies. Both
maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses yielded a more robust phylogenetic hypothesis relative to previous
studies and supported the monophyly of all 12 subfamilies, and a classification for 22 tribes, three of which are
newly recognized in this study. As a consequence, we propose an updated phylogenetically informed tribal
classification for Lamiaceae that is supplemented with a detailed summary of taxonomic history, generic and
species diversity, morphology, synapomorphies, and distribution for each subfamily and tribe.
Conclusions: Increased taxon sampling conjoined with phylogenetic analyses based on plastome sequences has
provided robust support at both deep and shallow nodes and offers new insights into the phylogenetic
relationships among tribes and subfamilies of Lamiaceae. This robust phylogenetic backbone of Lamiaceae will
serve as a framework for future studies on mint classification, biogeography, character evolution, and diversification
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref31817,
author = {Fei Zhao and Ya Ping Chen and Yasaman Salmaki and Bryan T. Drew and Trevor C. Wilson and Anne-Cathrine Scheen and Ferhat Celep and Christian Br?uchler and Mika Bendiksby and Qiang Wang and Hua Peng and Richard G. Olmstead and Bo Li and Chunlei Xiang},
title = {An updated tribal classification of Lamiaceae based on plastome phylogenomics},
year = {2021},
keywords = {Lamiaceae, Lamioideae, Mints, Phylogenomics, Tribal relationships},
doi = {10.1186/s12915-020-00931-z},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {BMC Biology},
volume = {19},
number = {},
pages = {2},
abstract = {Background: A robust molecular phylogeny is fundamental for developing a stable classification and providing a
solid framework to understand patterns of diversification, historical biogeography, and character evolution. As the
sixth largest angiosperm family, Lamiaceae, or the mint family, consitutes a major source of aromatic oil, wood,
ornamentals, and culinary and medicinal herbs, making it an exceptionally important group ecologically,
ethnobotanically, and floristically. The lack of a reliable phylogenetic framework for this family has thus far hindered
broad-scale biogeographic studies and our comprehension of diversification. Although significant progress has
been made towards clarifying Lamiaceae relationships during the past three decades, the resolution of a
phylogenetic backbone at the tribal level has remained one of the greatest challenges due to limited availability of
genetic data.
Results: We performed phylogenetic analyses of Lamiaceae to infer relationships at the tribal level using 79
protein-coding plastid genes from 175 accessions representing 170 taxa, 79 genera, and all 12 subfamilies. Both
maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses yielded a more robust phylogenetic hypothesis relative to previous
studies and supported the monophyly of all 12 subfamilies, and a classification for 22 tribes, three of which are
newly recognized in this study. As a consequence, we propose an updated phylogenetically informed tribal
classification for Lamiaceae that is supplemented with a detailed summary of taxonomic history, generic and
species diversity, morphology, synapomorphies, and distribution for each subfamily and tribe.
Conclusions: Increased taxon sampling conjoined with phylogenetic analyses based on plastome sequences has
provided robust support at both deep and shallow nodes and offers new insights into the phylogenetic
relationships among tribes and subfamilies of Lamiaceae. This robust phylogenetic backbone of Lamiaceae will
serve as a framework for future studies on mint classification, biogeography, character evolution, and diversification}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 31817
AU - Zhao,Fei
AU - Chen,Ya Ping
AU - Salmaki,Yasaman
AU - Drew,Bryan T.
AU - Wilson,Trevor C.
AU - Scheen,Anne-Cathrine
AU - Celep,Ferhat
AU - Br?uchler,Christian
AU - Bendiksby,Mika
AU - Wang,Qiang
AU - Peng,Hua
AU - Olmstead,Richard G.
AU - Li,Bo
AU - Xiang,Chunlei
T1 - An updated tribal classification of Lamiaceae based on plastome phylogenomics
PY - 2021
KW - Lamiaceae
KW - Lamioideae
KW - Mints
KW - Phylogenomics
KW - Tribal relationships
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00931-z
N2 - Background: A robust molecular phylogeny is fundamental for developing a stable classification and providing a
solid framework to understand patterns of diversification, historical biogeography, and character evolution. As the
sixth largest angiosperm family, Lamiaceae, or the mint family, consitutes a major source of aromatic oil, wood,
ornamentals, and culinary and medicinal herbs, making it an exceptionally important group ecologically,
ethnobotanically, and floristically. The lack of a reliable phylogenetic framework for this family has thus far hindered
broad-scale biogeographic studies and our comprehension of diversification. Although significant progress has
been made towards clarifying Lamiaceae relationships during the past three decades, the resolution of a
phylogenetic backbone at the tribal level has remained one of the greatest challenges due to limited availability of
genetic data.
Results: We performed phylogenetic analyses of Lamiaceae to infer relationships at the tribal level using 79
protein-coding plastid genes from 175 accessions representing 170 taxa, 79 genera, and all 12 subfamilies. Both
maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses yielded a more robust phylogenetic hypothesis relative to previous
studies and supported the monophyly of all 12 subfamilies, and a classification for 22 tribes, three of which are
newly recognized in this study. As a consequence, we propose an updated phylogenetically informed tribal
classification for Lamiaceae that is supplemented with a detailed summary of taxonomic history, generic and
species diversity, morphology, synapomorphies, and distribution for each subfamily and tribe.
Conclusions: Increased taxon sampling conjoined with phylogenetic analyses based on plastome sequences has
provided robust support at both deep and shallow nodes and offers new insights into the phylogenetic
relationships among tribes and subfamilies of Lamiaceae. This robust phylogenetic backbone of Lamiaceae will
serve as a framework for future studies on mint classification, biogeography, character evolution, and diversification
L3 - 10.1186/s12915-020-00931-z
JF - BMC Biology
VL - 19
IS -
ER -
Go to search
Citation
Taxa
Matrices
Trees
Analyses
Citation title: "An updated tribal classification of Lamiaceae based on plastome phylogenomics".
+4799566056
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S26639
Nexus
NeXML
