@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref23056,
author = {Koji Kageyama and Haruhisa Suga and Takahiro Asano and Keiichi Motohashi and Baten Md Abdul},
title = {Phylogenetic relationships among Phytopythium species, and re-evaluation of Phytopythium fagopyri comb. nov., recovered from damped-off buckwheat seedlings in Japan},
year = {2014},
keywords = {Phytopythium; re-evaluated species; buckwheat},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {Mycological Progress },
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {We examined the phylogenetic relationships among Phytopythium species using the rDNA ITS region, the LSU rDNA region, and the mitochondrial coxI and coxII genes. The genus was resolved into three monophyletic clades (1?3). Clade 1 was the largest clade, composed of 12 known species. Clades 2 contained two known and one new species candidate and clade 3 contained two known species. Three isolates in clade 2 (FP1, HonMa, and a strain designated as P. helicoides CBS293.35) formed a monophyletic group with high bootstrap support. This monophyletic group was distinct from P. helicoides sensu stricto. All three isolates came from damped-off buckwheat seedlings. The isolates were morphologically identical with one another and were characterized by globose, sub-globose, or pyriform sporangia with apical papillae; internally or internally nested proliferating sporangia; simple sympodia; coiling antheridial stalks; and wavy, sessile, or clavate antheridial cells. The isolates grew at temperatures between 15 ?C and 40 ?C and the optimum temperature was 30 ?C, with a radial growth rate of 20 mm/24h. The phylogenetic and morphological analyses indicated that these isolates belong to a distinct species, which was previously under the genus Pythium, name here as Phytopythium fagopyri comb. nov.}
}
You have reached this page using a special URL that is intended to be used
by journal editors and reviewers or referees of a paper that is under
consideration for publication. This URL gives you access to the submitted
data and metadata associated with analyses and results presented in the
paper under review. Please carefully examine the data paying special
attention to the following:
The citation data (authors, year, citation, abstract) should be
complete, except for information that is not yet known (e.g. volume or
page numbers).
Verify that nexus files are error-free and executable by software
programs (e.g. PAUP, Mesquite, MacClade, etc). Please make sure that the
taxon labels for trees are identical, or a subset of, the taxon labels in
data matrices connected by way of an analysis. If taxon labels in trees do
not match with taxon labels in associated data matrices, the data will not
be useful to the scientific community.
Verify that data are not missing and that opportunities to supply
valuable metadata are not overlooked. For example, TreeBASE can store
Genbank accession numbers, museum voucher IDs, latitude and longitudes for
specimen localities, character names and character state names for
morphological data, etc. Including these metadata are sometimes overlooked
by submitting authors, yet sharing this metadata is extremely valuable to
the scientific community. Please use your power as a reviewer to encourage
the sharing of richly-annotated metadata.
Verify that analyses are not missing and that, where possible, analysis
entries include software commands (e.g. the contents of a PAUP block or
MrBayes block) so that analyses can be replicated easily (e.g. commands
that describe substitution models, data partitions, and heuristic search
parameters).
Verify that taxon labels are mapped against TreeBASE's taxonomic
dictionary. Data in TreeBASE can only be found using a taxon name search if
the taxon labels are properly mapped.
By clicking the 'OK' button below, you agree to keep these data
confidential; you agree not to retain these data after completing your report
to the journal editor; you agree not to use these data or knowledge of these
data for the purposes of your research until and unless the paper under
review has been published and the data have been made available to the
general public; you agree to keep the URL confidential.
Citation title: "Phylogenetic relationships among Phytopythium species, and re-evaluation of Phytopythium fagopyri comb. nov., recovered from damped-off buckwheat seedlings in Japan".
Study name: "Phylogenetic relationships among Phytopythium species, and re-evaluation of Phytopythium fagopyri comb. nov., recovered from damped-off buckwheat seedlings in Japan".
This study is part of submission 15627
(Status: In Progress).
Citation
Kageyama K., Suga H., Asano T., Motohashi K., & Abdul B.M. 2014. Phylogenetic relationships among Phytopythium species, and re-evaluation of Phytopythium fagopyri comb. nov., recovered from damped-off buckwheat seedlings in Japan. Mycological Progress , .
Authors
Kageyama K.
Suga H.
Asano T.
Motohashi K.
Abdul B.M.
Abstract
We examined the phylogenetic relationships among Phytopythium species using the rDNA ITS region, the LSU rDNA region, and the mitochondrial coxI and coxII genes. The genus was resolved into three monophyletic clades (1?3). Clade 1 was the largest clade, composed of 12 known species. Clades 2 contained two known and one new species candidate and clade 3 contained two known species. Three isolates in clade 2 (FP1, HonMa, and a strain designated as P. helicoides CBS293.35) formed a monophyletic group with high bootstrap support. This monophyletic group was distinct from P. helicoides sensu stricto. All three isolates came from damped-off buckwheat seedlings. The isolates were morphologically identical with one another and were characterized by globose, sub-globose, or pyriform sporangia with apical papillae; internally or internally nested proliferating sporangia; simple sympodia; coiling antheridial stalks; and wavy, sessile, or clavate antheridial cells. The isolates grew at temperatures between 15 ?C and 40 ?C and the optimum temperature was 30 ?C, with a radial growth rate of 20 mm/24h. The phylogenetic and morphological analyses indicated that these isolates belong to a distinct species, which was previously under the genus Pythium, name here as Phytopythium fagopyri comb. nov.
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref23056,
author = {Koji Kageyama and Haruhisa Suga and Takahiro Asano and Keiichi Motohashi and Baten Md Abdul},
title = {Phylogenetic relationships among Phytopythium species, and re-evaluation of Phytopythium fagopyri comb. nov., recovered from damped-off buckwheat seedlings in Japan},
year = {2014},
keywords = {Phytopythium; re-evaluated species; buckwheat},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {Mycological Progress },
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {We examined the phylogenetic relationships among Phytopythium species using the rDNA ITS region, the LSU rDNA region, and the mitochondrial coxI and coxII genes. The genus was resolved into three monophyletic clades (1?3). Clade 1 was the largest clade, composed of 12 known species. Clades 2 contained two known and one new species candidate and clade 3 contained two known species. Three isolates in clade 2 (FP1, HonMa, and a strain designated as P. helicoides CBS293.35) formed a monophyletic group with high bootstrap support. This monophyletic group was distinct from P. helicoides sensu stricto. All three isolates came from damped-off buckwheat seedlings. The isolates were morphologically identical with one another and were characterized by globose, sub-globose, or pyriform sporangia with apical papillae; internally or internally nested proliferating sporangia; simple sympodia; coiling antheridial stalks; and wavy, sessile, or clavate antheridial cells. The isolates grew at temperatures between 15 ?C and 40 ?C and the optimum temperature was 30 ?C, with a radial growth rate of 20 mm/24h. The phylogenetic and morphological analyses indicated that these isolates belong to a distinct species, which was previously under the genus Pythium, name here as Phytopythium fagopyri comb. nov.}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 23056
AU - Kageyama,Koji
AU - Suga,Haruhisa
AU - Asano,Takahiro
AU - Motohashi,Keiichi
AU - Abdul,Baten Md
T1 - Phylogenetic relationships among Phytopythium species, and re-evaluation of Phytopythium fagopyri comb. nov., recovered from damped-off buckwheat seedlings in Japan
PY - 2014
KW - Phytopythium; re-evaluated species; buckwheat
UR - http://dx.doi.org/
N2 - We examined the phylogenetic relationships among Phytopythium species using the rDNA ITS region, the LSU rDNA region, and the mitochondrial coxI and coxII genes. The genus was resolved into three monophyletic clades (1?3). Clade 1 was the largest clade, composed of 12 known species. Clades 2 contained two known and one new species candidate and clade 3 contained two known species. Three isolates in clade 2 (FP1, HonMa, and a strain designated as P. helicoides CBS293.35) formed a monophyletic group with high bootstrap support. This monophyletic group was distinct from P. helicoides sensu stricto. All three isolates came from damped-off buckwheat seedlings. The isolates were morphologically identical with one another and were characterized by globose, sub-globose, or pyriform sporangia with apical papillae; internally or internally nested proliferating sporangia; simple sympodia; coiling antheridial stalks; and wavy, sessile, or clavate antheridial cells. The isolates grew at temperatures between 15 ?C and 40 ?C and the optimum temperature was 30 ?C, with a radial growth rate of 20 mm/24h. The phylogenetic and morphological analyses indicated that these isolates belong to a distinct species, which was previously under the genus Pythium, name here as Phytopythium fagopyri comb. nov.
L3 -
JF - Mycological Progress
VL -
IS -
ER -