@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref30484,
author = {Angie Marie Macias and David M. Geiser and Jason E Stajich and Piotr Łukasik and Claudio Veloso and DeAnna C Bublitz and Matthew C Berger and Greg R Boyce and Kathie T Hodge and Matthew T. Kasson},
title = {Evolutionary relationships among Massospora spp. (Entomophthorales), obligate pathogens of cicadas},
year = {2020},
keywords = {Zoopagomycota, Entomophthoraceae, Entomopathogen, Invertebrate pathology, Magicicada, Okanagana, Platypedia, Tettigades, Diceroprocta, Synonymization},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {Mycologia},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {The fungal genus Massospora (Zoopagomycota: Entomophthorales) includes more than a dozen obligate, sexually transmissible pathogenic species that infect cicadas (Hemiptera) worldwide. At least two species are known to produce psychoactive compounds during infection, which has garnered considerable interest for this enigmatic genus. As with many Entomophthorales, the evolutionary relationships and host associations of Massospora spp. are not well understood. The acquisition of M. diceroproctae from Arizona, M. tettigatis from Chile, and M. platypediae from California and Colorado provided an opportunity to conduct molecular phylogenetic analyses and morphological studies to investigate if these fungi represent a monophyletic group and delimit species boundaries. In a three-locus phylogenetic analysis including the D1?D2 domains of nuc 28S (28S), elongation factor 1 alpha-like (EFL), and beta-tubulin (BTUB), Massospora was resolved in a strongly supported monophyletic group containing four well-supported genealogically exclusive lineages, based on two of three methods of phylogenetic inference. There was incongruence among the single-gene trees: two methods of phylogenetic inference recovered trees with either the same topology as the 3-gene concatenated tree (EFL), or a basal polytomy (28S, BTUB). Massospora levispora and M. platypediae isolates formed a single lineage in all analyses and are synonymized here as M. levispora. Massospora diceroproctae was sister to M. cicadina in all three single-gene trees and on an extremely long branch relative to the other Massospora, and even the outgroup taxa, which may reflect an accelerated rate of molecular evolution and/or incomplete taxa sampling. The results of the morphological study presented here indicate that spore measurements may not be phylogenetically or diagnostically informative. Despite recent advances in understanding the ecology of Massospora, much about its host range and diversity remains unexplored. The emerging phylogenetic framework can provide a foundation for exploring co-evolutionary relationships with cicada hosts as well as the evolution of behavior-altering compounds.}
}
Matrix 52583 of Study 25818

Citation title:
"Evolutionary relationships among Massospora spp. (Entomophthorales), obligate pathogens of cicadas".

Study name:
"Evolutionary relationships among Massospora spp. (Entomophthorales), obligate pathogens of cicadas".

This study is part of submission 25818
(Status: Published).
Matrices
Title: Sphaerocarpales rbcL psbA-trnH 26S
Rows
Taxon Label |
Row Segments |
Characters 1?–30 |
Austroriella salta |
(none)
|
AGGTGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Geothallus tuberosus |
(none)
|
?????????????????????????????? |
Monocarpus sphaerocarpus |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Riella helicophylla |
(none)
|
????????????????GCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos cristatus |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAGAGA |
Sphaerocarpos donnellii |
(none)
|
AGGTGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos drewiae I |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos drewiae II |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos michelii I |
(none)
|
?????????????????????????????? |
Sphaerocarpos michelii II |
(none)
|
AGGTGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos michelii III |
(none)
|
AGGTGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos michelii IV |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos michelii IX |
(none)
|
??????????????????????????GAGA |
Sphaerocarpos michelii V |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos michelii VI |
(none)
|
AGGTGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos michelii VII |
(none)
|
AGGTGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos michelii VIII |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos michelii X |
(none)
|
AGGTGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAGAGA |
Sphaerocarpos siguniangensis |
(none)
|
AGGTGCTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos stipitatus I |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos stipitatus II |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos texanus I |
(none)
|
AGGTGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos texanus II |
(none)
|
???????GGATT-AAAGCTGGTGTTAAAGA |
Sphaerocarpos texanus III |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAAA |
Sphaerocarpos texanus IV |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAAA |
Sphaerocarpos texanus IX |
(none)
|
AGGTGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAAA |
Sphaerocarpos texanus V |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAAA |
Sphaerocarpos texanus VI |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAAA |
Sphaerocarpos texanus VII |
(none)
|
AGGCGTTGGATTCAAAGCTGGTGTTAAAAA |
Columns
None of the columns has a description.