@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref16158,
author = {Rampai Kodsueb and Rajesh Jeewon and Dhanasekaran Vijaykrishna and Andr? Aptroot and E. H. C. McKenzie and Saisamorn Lumyong and Kevin D Hyde},
title = {The family Pleosporaceae: intergeneric relationships and phylogenetic perspectives based on sequence analyses of partial 28S rDNA},
year = {2006},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Mycologia},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {The Pleosporaceae is an important loculoascomycete family. There has however, been disagreement regarding the taxonomic placement of many genera within this family. This study investigates phylogenetic relationships among the genera Cochliobolus, Kirschsteiniothelia, Leptosphaerulina, Macroventuria, Pleospora, Pyrenophora, and Wettsteinina. Partial 28S rDNA sequences from taxa within these genera were analysed using maximum parsimony, likelihood and bayesian methods. Cochliobolus can broadly be segregated into two groups as previously proposed. Pleospora is polyphyletic in its current sense. Taxa with Stemphylium anamorphs are closely related to Cochliobolus and fit within the Pleosporaceae, whereas the affinities of Pleospora herbarum and P. ambigua are still obscure. Pyrenophora constitute a monophyletic group within the Pleosporaceae whereas Leptosphaerulina and Macroventuria appear to share phylogenetic affinities to the Leptosphaeriaceae and Phaeosphaeriaceae. Phylogenies indicate that Wettsteinina should be excluded from the Pleosporaceae. Similar findings are reported for Kirschsteiniothelia which is probably polyphyletic. Anamorphic characters appear to be significant (especially in Cochliobolus) while ascospore morphologies, such as shape and color and substrate occurrence are poor predictors of phylogenetic relationships among these loculoascomycetes.}
}
Matrix 2400 of Study 1556
Citation title:
"The family Pleosporaceae: intergeneric relationships and phylogenetic perspectives based on sequence analyses of partial 28S rDNA".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S1501
(Status: Published).
Matrices
Title: atpB-rbcL spacer & gap matrix
Description: Legacy TreeBASE Matrix ID = M1762
Rows
|
Taxon Label |
Row Segments |
Characters 1?–30 |
| Eucharis formosa |
(none)
|
?????????????????????????????? |
| Eucharis castelnaeana |
(none)
|
??????????????????????T0GGTTTT |
| Eucrosia dodsonii |
(none)
|
??????????????????????????TGTT |
| Stenomesson chloranthum |
(none)
|
????00TTTG0G1G0TG1G111T0GGTTTT |
| Stenomesson latifolium |
(none)
|
???????????????????11-T01GTTTT |
| Pucara leucantha |
(none)
|
?????0TTTG0G1G0TG1G111T0GGTTTT |
| Stenomesson miniatum |
(none)
|
??????????????????G11-1TGGTTTT |
| Hymenocallis tubiflora |
(none)
|
????????????????G1G1G1T0GGTTTT |
| Hymenocallis latifolia |
(none)
|
???????????????TG1G111T0GGTTTT |
| Ismene vargasii |
(none)
|
????00TTTG0G1G0TG1G111T0GGTTTT |
| Hymenocallis chiapasiana |
(none)
|
???????????????????111T0TGTTTT |
| Hymenocallis glauca |
(none)
|
????????????????G1G111T0GGTTTT |
| Stenomesson aurantiacum |
(none)
|
100T00TTTG0G1G0TG1G111T0GGTTTT |
| Clinanthus humilis |
(none)
|
????????????1G0TG1G111T01GTTTT |
| Clinanthus incarnatus |
(none)
|
??????????1111TTG1G111T0-GTTTT |
| Clinanthus mirabilis |
(none)
|
?????????????????????????GTTTT |
| Chlidanthus fragrans |
(none)
|
????00TTTG0G1G0TG1G111T0GGTTTT |
| Eustephia darwinii |
(none)
|
????00TTTG0G1G0TG1G111T0GGTTTT |
Columns
None of the columns has a description.
Go to search
Citation
Taxa
Matrices
Trees
Analyses
