CiteULike CiteULike
Delicious Delicious
Connotea Connotea

Citation for Study 1334

About Citation title: "Molecular phylogeny of Conradina and other scrub mints (Lamiaceae) from the southeastern USA using nuclear ribosomal and plastid markers: Evidence for hybridization in Pleistocene refugia?".
About This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S1262 (Status: Published).

Citation

Edwards C., Soltis D., & Soltis P. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of Conradina and other scrub mints (Lamiaceae) from the southeastern USA using nuclear ribosomal and plastid markers: Evidence for hybridization in Pleistocene refugia?. Systematic Botany, null.

Authors

  • Edwards C.
  • Soltis D.
  • Soltis P.

Abstract

Conradina (Lamiaceae) consists of six allopatric species endemic to the southeastern United States, four of which are federally endangered or threatened. The limits and status of several taxa have been contested based on morphological grounds, and clarification of these limits is necessary for the design and implementation of effective and fiscally responsible protection and management plans. The objectives of this study were to investigate the monophyly of Conradina and its relationship to other related mints which are endemic to the southeastern United States, to understand the patterns of diversification in Conradina, and to clarify species relationships. A molecular phylogeny was inferred by sequencing ITS and plastid regions from multiple accessions of each species of Conradina and individuals from Clinopodium, Dicerandra, Piloblephis, Stachydeoma, Monarda, Pycnanthemum, and Mentha. ITS sequence data strongly support the monophyly of Conradina, in agreement with evidence from morphology. In contrast, plastid sequence data do not support a monophyletic Conradina and place Conradina as paraphyletic to Clinopodium, Stachydeoma, and Piloblephis spp. Similar plastid haplotypes are shared by different genera, perhaps due to shared ancestral polymorphisms, or more likely, introgression that occurred recently or during the Pleistocene. Within Conradina, ITS sequence data do not resolve species-level relationships, while plastid sequence data do not support the monophyly of most traditionally-defined species of Conradina that are distinguishable morphologically. Species-level relationships in the plastid data set may also be obscured by introgression or ancestral polymorphism. More rapidly evolving sequence data from nuclear markers will be necessary to clarify relationships in Conradina and related southeastern mints.

About this resource

  • Canonical resource URI: http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S1334
  • Other versions: Download Reconstructed NEXUS File Nexus Download NeXML File NeXML
  • Show BibTeX reference
  • Show RIS reference