@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref17456,
author = {Robert N. Schwarzwalder and David L. Dilcher},
title = {Systematic placement of the Plantaceae in the Hamamelidae.},
year = {1991},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden},
volume = {78},
number = {},
pages = {962--969},
abstract = {A cladistic analysis of the basal Hamamelidae based upon 92 characters is presented. The results support a close phylogenetic relationship between the subfamily Altingioideae (Hamamelidaceae) and Plantanaceae but suggest that present hypotheses concerning the derivation of the Hamamelidae from the Magnoliidae need revision. Analysis of the five subfamilies of Hamamelidaceae using Plantanaceae as an outgroup yields a phylogeny that corresponds to the fossil record far better than does current theory. As a result of this study and recent paloebotanical and phytochemical evidence, it is suggested that Hamamelidae are at least as primitive as Magnoliidae.}
}
Citation for Study 184
Citation title:
"Systematic placement of the Plantaceae in the Hamamelidae.".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S2x3x96c16c52c27
(Status: Published).
Citation
Schwarzwalder R., & Dilcher D. 1991. Systematic placement of the Plantaceae in the Hamamelidae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 78: 962-969.
Authors
-
Schwarzwalder R.
-
Dilcher D.
Abstract
A cladistic analysis of the basal Hamamelidae based upon 92 characters is presented. The results support a close phylogenetic relationship between the subfamily Altingioideae (Hamamelidaceae) and Plantanaceae but suggest that present hypotheses concerning the derivation of the Hamamelidae from the Magnoliidae need revision. Analysis of the five subfamilies of Hamamelidaceae using Plantanaceae as an outgroup yields a phylogeny that corresponds to the fossil record far better than does current theory. As a result of this study and recent paloebotanical and phytochemical evidence, it is suggested that Hamamelidae are at least as primitive as Magnoliidae.
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S184
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref17456,
author = {Robert N. Schwarzwalder and David L. Dilcher},
title = {Systematic placement of the Plantaceae in the Hamamelidae.},
year = {1991},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden},
volume = {78},
number = {},
pages = {962--969},
abstract = {A cladistic analysis of the basal Hamamelidae based upon 92 characters is presented. The results support a close phylogenetic relationship between the subfamily Altingioideae (Hamamelidaceae) and Plantanaceae but suggest that present hypotheses concerning the derivation of the Hamamelidae from the Magnoliidae need revision. Analysis of the five subfamilies of Hamamelidaceae using Plantanaceae as an outgroup yields a phylogeny that corresponds to the fossil record far better than does current theory. As a result of this study and recent paloebotanical and phytochemical evidence, it is suggested that Hamamelidae are at least as primitive as Magnoliidae.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 17456
AU - Schwarzwalder,Robert N.
AU - Dilcher,David L.
T1 - Systematic placement of the Plantaceae in the Hamamelidae.
PY - 1991
UR -
N2 - A cladistic analysis of the basal Hamamelidae based upon 92 characters is presented. The results support a close phylogenetic relationship between the subfamily Altingioideae (Hamamelidaceae) and Plantanaceae but suggest that present hypotheses concerning the derivation of the Hamamelidae from the Magnoliidae need revision. Analysis of the five subfamilies of Hamamelidaceae using Plantanaceae as an outgroup yields a phylogeny that corresponds to the fossil record far better than does current theory. As a result of this study and recent paloebotanical and phytochemical evidence, it is suggested that Hamamelidae are at least as primitive as Magnoliidae.
L3 -
JF - Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden
VL - 78
IS -
SP - 962
EP - 969
ER -