@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref14560,
author = {Arne A. Anderberg},
title = {Phylogeny and reclassification of the tribe Inuleae (Asteraceae).},
year = {1989},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Canadian Journal of Botany},
volume = {67},
number = {},
pages = {2277--2296},
abstract = {The tribe Inuleae Cass. has been subject to a critical investigation. The many technical characters that are traditionally used in classification of the Inuleae are scrutinized, discussed, and analysed by means of a computerized parsimony program (PAUP). With one representative from each of the tribes Vernonieae, Liabeae, and Lactuceae as outgroups, three different analyses have been performed. Strict consensus trees for the three separate analyses are presented and discussed. A consensus tree based on the cladogram topologies obtained from all the three analyses is also presented. The taxonomic implication of the analyses is that the tribe Inuleae is an unnatural, not monophyletic group, which must be divided in better defined monophyletic tribes. Hence, three tribes are recognized and the majority of the described genera of the Inuleae are tentatively referred to one of these tribes . The tribes Gnaphalieae Rydb. (comprising the InuleaeGnaphaliinae and the Inuleae - Athrixiinae sensu Merxmuller et al.) and the Inuleae s.str., are accepted. Furthermore, the former subtribe InuleaePlucheinae Benth. is recognized and described as the new tribe Plucheae (Benth.) A. Anderb.}
}
Citation for Study 223
Citation title:
"Phylogeny and reclassification of the tribe Inuleae (Asteraceae).".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S2x4x96c16c23c42
(Status: Published).
Citation
Anderberg A. 1989. Phylogeny and reclassification of the tribe Inuleae (Asteraceae). Canadian Journal of Botany, 67: 2277-2296.
Authors
Abstract
The tribe Inuleae Cass. has been subject to a critical investigation. The many technical characters that are traditionally used in classification of the Inuleae are scrutinized, discussed, and analysed by means of a computerized parsimony program (PAUP). With one representative from each of the tribes Vernonieae, Liabeae, and Lactuceae as outgroups, three different analyses have been performed. Strict consensus trees for the three separate analyses are presented and discussed. A consensus tree based on the cladogram topologies obtained from all the three analyses is also presented. The taxonomic implication of the analyses is that the tribe Inuleae is an unnatural, not monophyletic group, which must be divided in better defined monophyletic tribes. Hence, three tribes are recognized and the majority of the described genera of the Inuleae are tentatively referred to one of these tribes . The tribes Gnaphalieae Rydb. (comprising the InuleaeGnaphaliinae and the Inuleae - Athrixiinae sensu Merxmuller et al.) and the Inuleae s.str., are accepted. Furthermore, the former subtribe InuleaePlucheinae Benth. is recognized and described as the new tribe Plucheae (Benth.) A. Anderb.
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S223
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref14560,
author = {Arne A. Anderberg},
title = {Phylogeny and reclassification of the tribe Inuleae (Asteraceae).},
year = {1989},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Canadian Journal of Botany},
volume = {67},
number = {},
pages = {2277--2296},
abstract = {The tribe Inuleae Cass. has been subject to a critical investigation. The many technical characters that are traditionally used in classification of the Inuleae are scrutinized, discussed, and analysed by means of a computerized parsimony program (PAUP). With one representative from each of the tribes Vernonieae, Liabeae, and Lactuceae as outgroups, three different analyses have been performed. Strict consensus trees for the three separate analyses are presented and discussed. A consensus tree based on the cladogram topologies obtained from all the three analyses is also presented. The taxonomic implication of the analyses is that the tribe Inuleae is an unnatural, not monophyletic group, which must be divided in better defined monophyletic tribes. Hence, three tribes are recognized and the majority of the described genera of the Inuleae are tentatively referred to one of these tribes . The tribes Gnaphalieae Rydb. (comprising the InuleaeGnaphaliinae and the Inuleae - Athrixiinae sensu Merxmuller et al.) and the Inuleae s.str., are accepted. Furthermore, the former subtribe InuleaePlucheinae Benth. is recognized and described as the new tribe Plucheae (Benth.) A. Anderb.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 14560
AU - Anderberg,Arne A.
T1 - Phylogeny and reclassification of the tribe Inuleae (Asteraceae).
PY - 1989
UR -
N2 - The tribe Inuleae Cass. has been subject to a critical investigation. The many technical characters that are traditionally used in classification of the Inuleae are scrutinized, discussed, and analysed by means of a computerized parsimony program (PAUP). With one representative from each of the tribes Vernonieae, Liabeae, and Lactuceae as outgroups, three different analyses have been performed. Strict consensus trees for the three separate analyses are presented and discussed. A consensus tree based on the cladogram topologies obtained from all the three analyses is also presented. The taxonomic implication of the analyses is that the tribe Inuleae is an unnatural, not monophyletic group, which must be divided in better defined monophyletic tribes. Hence, three tribes are recognized and the majority of the described genera of the Inuleae are tentatively referred to one of these tribes . The tribes Gnaphalieae Rydb. (comprising the InuleaeGnaphaliinae and the Inuleae - Athrixiinae sensu Merxmuller et al.) and the Inuleae s.str., are accepted. Furthermore, the former subtribe InuleaePlucheinae Benth. is recognized and described as the new tribe Plucheae (Benth.) A. Anderb.
L3 -
JF - Canadian Journal of Botany
VL - 67
IS -
SP - 2277
EP - 2296
ER -
Go to search
Citation
Taxa
Matrices
Trees
Analyses
