@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref28777,
author = {Nicomedes Valenzuela-Lopez and Jose F. Cano-Lira and Josep Guarro and Deanna A. Sutton and Nathan P Wiederhold and Pedro W. Crous and Alberto Miguel Stchigel},
title = {Coelomycetous Dothideomycetes with emphasis on the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae.},
year = {2018},
keywords = {Cucurbitariaceae, Didymellaceae, Multigene phylogeny, Phoma, Pleosporineae, Pleosporales, Pyrenochaeta, Pyrenochaetopsis, Taxonomy},
doi = {10.1016/j.simyco.2017.11.003},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {Studies in Mycology},
volume = {90},
number = {},
pages = {1--69},
abstract = {The taxonomy of the coelomycetes has undergone dramatic changes in recent years, but remains controversial due to the high number of taxa involved, their poor morphological differentiation, the rare occurrence of the sexual morphs, and rapid loss of fertility in vitro. In the present study, we revisited the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes), which include numerous plant pathogens, endophytic species associated with a wide host range, and saprobes. The taxonomy of two of the most relevant genera, i.e. Phoma and Pyrenochaeta, remains ambiguous after several phylogenetic studies, and needs further revision. We have studied a total of 143 strains of coelomycetes from clinical or environmental origin, by combining the LSU, ITS, tub2 and rpb2 sequences for a multi-locus analysis and a detailed morphological comparison. The resulting phylogenetic tree revealed that some fungi previously considered as members of Cucurbitariaceae represented five different families, and four of them, Neopyrenochaetaceae, Parapyrenochaetaceae, Pseudopyrenochaetaceae and Pyrenochaetopsidaceae, are proposed here as new. Furthermore, 13 new genera, 28 new species, and 20 new combinations are proposed within the Pleosporineae. Moreover, four new typifications are introduced to stabilise the taxonomy of these fungi.}
}
Citation for Study 21115
Citation title:
"Coelomycetous Dothideomycetes with emphasis on the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae.".
Study name:
"Coelomycetous Dothideomycetes with emphasis on the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae.".
This study is part of submission 21115
(Status: Published).
Citation
Valenzuela-lopez N., Cano-lira J.F., Guarro J., Sutton D., Wiederhold N.P., Crous P.W., & Stchigel A.M. 2018. Coelomycetous Dothideomycetes with emphasis on the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae. Studies in Mycology, 90: 1-69.
Authors
-
Valenzuela-lopez N.
-
Cano-lira J.F.
+34 977 759350
-
Guarro J.
-
Sutton D.
-
Wiederhold N.P.
-
Crous P.W.
-
Stchigel A.M.
34626525611
Abstract
The taxonomy of the coelomycetes has undergone dramatic changes in recent years, but remains controversial due to the high number of taxa involved, their poor morphological differentiation, the rare occurrence of the sexual morphs, and rapid loss of fertility in vitro. In the present study, we revisited the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes), which include numerous plant pathogens, endophytic species associated with a wide host range, and saprobes. The taxonomy of two of the most relevant genera, i.e. Phoma and Pyrenochaeta, remains ambiguous after several phylogenetic studies, and needs further revision. We have studied a total of 143 strains of coelomycetes from clinical or environmental origin, by combining the LSU, ITS, tub2 and rpb2 sequences for a multi-locus analysis and a detailed morphological comparison. The resulting phylogenetic tree revealed that some fungi previously considered as members of Cucurbitariaceae represented five different families, and four of them, Neopyrenochaetaceae, Parapyrenochaetaceae, Pseudopyrenochaetaceae and Pyrenochaetopsidaceae, are proposed here as new. Furthermore, 13 new genera, 28 new species, and 20 new combinations are proposed within the Pleosporineae. Moreover, four new typifications are introduced to stabilise the taxonomy of these fungi.
Keywords
Cucurbitariaceae, Didymellaceae, Multigene phylogeny, Phoma, Pleosporineae, Pleosporales, Pyrenochaeta, Pyrenochaetopsis, Taxonomy
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S21115
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref28777,
author = {Nicomedes Valenzuela-Lopez and Jose F. Cano-Lira and Josep Guarro and Deanna A. Sutton and Nathan P Wiederhold and Pedro W. Crous and Alberto Miguel Stchigel},
title = {Coelomycetous Dothideomycetes with emphasis on the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae.},
year = {2018},
keywords = {Cucurbitariaceae, Didymellaceae, Multigene phylogeny, Phoma, Pleosporineae, Pleosporales, Pyrenochaeta, Pyrenochaetopsis, Taxonomy},
doi = {10.1016/j.simyco.2017.11.003},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {Studies in Mycology},
volume = {90},
number = {},
pages = {1--69},
abstract = {The taxonomy of the coelomycetes has undergone dramatic changes in recent years, but remains controversial due to the high number of taxa involved, their poor morphological differentiation, the rare occurrence of the sexual morphs, and rapid loss of fertility in vitro. In the present study, we revisited the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes), which include numerous plant pathogens, endophytic species associated with a wide host range, and saprobes. The taxonomy of two of the most relevant genera, i.e. Phoma and Pyrenochaeta, remains ambiguous after several phylogenetic studies, and needs further revision. We have studied a total of 143 strains of coelomycetes from clinical or environmental origin, by combining the LSU, ITS, tub2 and rpb2 sequences for a multi-locus analysis and a detailed morphological comparison. The resulting phylogenetic tree revealed that some fungi previously considered as members of Cucurbitariaceae represented five different families, and four of them, Neopyrenochaetaceae, Parapyrenochaetaceae, Pseudopyrenochaetaceae and Pyrenochaetopsidaceae, are proposed here as new. Furthermore, 13 new genera, 28 new species, and 20 new combinations are proposed within the Pleosporineae. Moreover, four new typifications are introduced to stabilise the taxonomy of these fungi.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 28777
AU - Valenzuela-Lopez,Nicomedes
AU - Cano-Lira,Jose F.
AU - Guarro,Josep
AU - Sutton,Deanna A.
AU - Wiederhold,Nathan P
AU - Crous,Pedro W.
AU - Stchigel,Alberto Miguel
T1 - Coelomycetous Dothideomycetes with emphasis on the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae.
PY - 2018
KW - Cucurbitariaceae
KW - Didymellaceae
KW - Multigene phylogeny
KW - Phoma
KW - Pleosporineae
KW - Pleosporales
KW - Pyrenochaeta
KW - Pyrenochaetopsis
KW - Taxonomy
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2017.11.003
N2 - The taxonomy of the coelomycetes has undergone dramatic changes in recent years, but remains controversial due to the high number of taxa involved, their poor morphological differentiation, the rare occurrence of the sexual morphs, and rapid loss of fertility in vitro. In the present study, we revisited the families Cucurbitariaceae and Didymellaceae (Pleosporales, Dothideomycetes), which include numerous plant pathogens, endophytic species associated with a wide host range, and saprobes. The taxonomy of two of the most relevant genera, i.e. Phoma and Pyrenochaeta, remains ambiguous after several phylogenetic studies, and needs further revision. We have studied a total of 143 strains of coelomycetes from clinical or environmental origin, by combining the LSU, ITS, tub2 and rpb2 sequences for a multi-locus analysis and a detailed morphological comparison. The resulting phylogenetic tree revealed that some fungi previously considered as members of Cucurbitariaceae represented five different families, and four of them, Neopyrenochaetaceae, Parapyrenochaetaceae, Pseudopyrenochaetaceae and Pyrenochaetopsidaceae, are proposed here as new. Furthermore, 13 new genera, 28 new species, and 20 new combinations are proposed within the Pleosporineae. Moreover, four new typifications are introduced to stabilise the taxonomy of these fungi.
L3 - 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.11.003
JF - Studies in Mycology
VL - 90
IS -
SP - 1
EP - 69
ER -