@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref15116,
author = {Brian I. Crother and Michael M. Miyamoto and William F. Presch},
title = {Phylogeny and biogeography of the lizard family Xantusiidae.},
year = {1986},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Systematic Zoology},
volume = {35},
number = {},
pages = {37--45},
abstract = {The intergeneric relationships of the lizard family Xantusiidae were reevaluated against a cladistic synthesis of morphological (squamation and osteology) and karyological data. The two data sets were analyzed independently and examined for congruent patterns with each other and against biogeographic-geologic data. Patterns indicated by morphological, karyological, and biogeographic-geologic data suggest two sister groups: (1) Klauberina-Xantusia; and (2) Cricosaura-Lepidophyma. Our phylogeny differs from the accepted view of xantusiid relationships in suggesting that Lepidophyma should be transferred from the subfamily Xantusiinae (currently consisting of Klauberina, Lepidophyma, and Xantusia) to the Cricosaurinae. We propose a vicariance model for the distribution of the Xantusia-Klauberina clade.}
}
Citation for Study 313
Citation title:
"Phylogeny and biogeography of the lizard family Xantusiidae.".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S232
(Status: Published).
Citation
Crother B., Miyamoto M., & Presch W. 1986. Phylogeny and biogeography of the lizard family Xantusiidae. Systematic Zoology, 35: 37-45.
Authors
-
Crother B.
-
Miyamoto M.
-
Presch W.
Abstract
The intergeneric relationships of the lizard family Xantusiidae were reevaluated against a cladistic synthesis of morphological (squamation and osteology) and karyological data. The two data sets were analyzed independently and examined for congruent patterns with each other and against biogeographic-geologic data. Patterns indicated by morphological, karyological, and biogeographic-geologic data suggest two sister groups: (1) Klauberina-Xantusia; and (2) Cricosaura-Lepidophyma. Our phylogeny differs from the accepted view of xantusiid relationships in suggesting that Lepidophyma should be transferred from the subfamily Xantusiinae (currently consisting of Klauberina, Lepidophyma, and Xantusia) to the Cricosaurinae. We propose a vicariance model for the distribution of the Xantusia-Klauberina clade.
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S313
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref15116,
author = {Brian I. Crother and Michael M. Miyamoto and William F. Presch},
title = {Phylogeny and biogeography of the lizard family Xantusiidae.},
year = {1986},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Systematic Zoology},
volume = {35},
number = {},
pages = {37--45},
abstract = {The intergeneric relationships of the lizard family Xantusiidae were reevaluated against a cladistic synthesis of morphological (squamation and osteology) and karyological data. The two data sets were analyzed independently and examined for congruent patterns with each other and against biogeographic-geologic data. Patterns indicated by morphological, karyological, and biogeographic-geologic data suggest two sister groups: (1) Klauberina-Xantusia; and (2) Cricosaura-Lepidophyma. Our phylogeny differs from the accepted view of xantusiid relationships in suggesting that Lepidophyma should be transferred from the subfamily Xantusiinae (currently consisting of Klauberina, Lepidophyma, and Xantusia) to the Cricosaurinae. We propose a vicariance model for the distribution of the Xantusia-Klauberina clade.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 15116
AU - Crother,Brian I.
AU - Miyamoto,Michael M.
AU - Presch,William F.
T1 - Phylogeny and biogeography of the lizard family Xantusiidae.
PY - 1986
UR -
N2 - The intergeneric relationships of the lizard family Xantusiidae were reevaluated against a cladistic synthesis of morphological (squamation and osteology) and karyological data. The two data sets were analyzed independently and examined for congruent patterns with each other and against biogeographic-geologic data. Patterns indicated by morphological, karyological, and biogeographic-geologic data suggest two sister groups: (1) Klauberina-Xantusia; and (2) Cricosaura-Lepidophyma. Our phylogeny differs from the accepted view of xantusiid relationships in suggesting that Lepidophyma should be transferred from the subfamily Xantusiinae (currently consisting of Klauberina, Lepidophyma, and Xantusia) to the Cricosaurinae. We propose a vicariance model for the distribution of the Xantusia-Klauberina clade.
L3 -
JF - Systematic Zoology
VL - 35
IS -
SP - 37
EP - 45
ER -