CiteULike

Delicious

Connotea

Citation for Study 11245

Citation title: "Relationships in the Timmia norvegica complex (Bryophyta: Musci) based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data".

Study name: "Relationships in the Timmia norvegica complex (Bryophyta: Musci) based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data".

This study is part of submission 11235 (Status: Published).

Citation

Hedenas L. 2011. Relationships in the Timmia norvegica complex (Bryophyta: Musci) based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data. The Bryologist, .

Authors

• Hedenas L. (submitter) +46-8-51954214

Abstract

Information from a portion of the nuclear 26S and the chloroplast trnL-trnF and atpB-rbcL was used to reconstruct relationships among specimens having T. norvegica J.E.Zetterst., T. comata Lindb. & Arnell, and T. sibirica Lindb. & Arnell morphology. Whereas maximum parsimony analysis provided high support for Timmia section Norvegica, T. comata, and a clade with T. sibirica plus T. norvegica, the relationships among specimens with morphologies of the latter two taxa could be resolved only by means of haplotype networks. The haplotype network based on 26S distinguishes T. sibirica from T. norvegica, whereas the two chloroplast markers do not. Based on the 26S differences and morphological evidence, T. sibirica and T. norvegica are considered different at the species level. Timmia comata is resolved in a haplotype network separate from that of T. norvegica plus T. sibirica. In combination with the high Bootstrap support of the clade with T. comata specimens and their morphological distinctness from T. norvegica, this provides very high support for its recognition as a distinct species.

Keywords

Haplotype network, 26S, Timmia section Norvegica, Type

External links

About this resource

• Canonical resource URI: http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S11245
• Other versions: Nexus NeXML
• Show BibTeX reference

  		@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref19500,
  	 author = {Lars  Hedenas},
  	 title = {Relationships in the Timmia norvegica complex (Bryophyta: Musci) based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data},
  	 year = {2011},
  	 keywords = {Haplotype network, 26S, Timmia section Norvegica, Type},
  	 doi = {},
  	 url = {http://},
  	 pmid = {},
  	 journal = {The Bryologist},
  	 volume = {},
  	 number = {},
  	 pages = {},
  	 abstract = {Information from a portion of the nuclear 26S and the chloroplast trnL-trnF and atpB-rbcL was used to reconstruct relationships among specimens having T. norvegica J.E.Zetterst., T. comata Lindb. & Arnell, and T. sibirica Lindb. & Arnell morphology. Whereas maximum parsimony analysis provided high support for Timmia section Norvegica, T. comata, and a clade with T. sibirica plus T. norvegica, the relationships among specimens with morphologies of the latter two taxa could be resolved only by means of haplotype networks. The haplotype network based on 26S distinguishes T. sibirica from T. norvegica, whereas the two chloroplast markers do not. Based on the 26S differences and morphological evidence, T. sibirica and T. norvegica are considered different at the species level. Timmia comata is resolved in a haplotype network separate from that of T. norvegica plus T. sibirica. In combination with the high Bootstrap support of the clade with T. comata specimens and their morphological distinctness from T. norvegica, this provides very high support for its recognition as a distinct species.}
  }
  		

• Show RIS reference

  		TY  - JOUR
  ID  - 19500
  AU  - Hedenas,Lars 
  T1  - Relationships in the Timmia norvegica complex (Bryophyta: Musci) based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data
  PY  - 2011
  KW  - Haplotype network
  KW  - 26S
  KW  - Timmia section Norvegica
  KW  - Type
  UR  - http://dx.doi.org/
  N2  - Information from a portion of the nuclear 26S and the chloroplast trnL-trnF and atpB-rbcL was used to reconstruct relationships among specimens having T. norvegica J.E.Zetterst., T. comata Lindb. & Arnell, and T. sibirica Lindb. & Arnell morphology. Whereas maximum parsimony analysis provided high support for Timmia section Norvegica, T. comata, and a clade with T. sibirica plus T. norvegica, the relationships among specimens with morphologies of the latter two taxa could be resolved only by means of haplotype networks. The haplotype network based on 26S distinguishes T. sibirica from T. norvegica, whereas the two chloroplast markers do not. Based on the 26S differences and morphological evidence, T. sibirica and T. norvegica are considered different at the species level. Timmia comata is resolved in a haplotype network separate from that of T. norvegica plus T. sibirica. In combination with the high Bootstrap support of the clade with T. comata specimens and their morphological distinctness from T. norvegica, this provides very high support for its recognition as a distinct species.
  L3  - 
  JF  - The Bryologist
  VL  - 
  IS  - 
  ER  -