CiteULike

Delicious

Connotea

Citation for Study 982

Citation title: "The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL/F region of Chloroplast DNA.".

This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S868 (Status: Published).

Citation

Eriksson T., Hibbs M., Yoder A.D., Delwiche C., & Donoghue M.J. 2003. The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL/F region of Chloroplast DNA. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 164(2).

Authors

• Eriksson T.
• Hibbs M.
• Yoder A.D.
• Delwiche C.
• Donoghue M.J.

Abstract

The phylogeny of Rosoideae was investigated using 44 species. Here we report new sequence data from the chloroplast trnL?trnF region as well as an increased sample of species. The analysis of these new data, along with previously used data from the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), significantly increased resolution as well as confidence for Rosoideae phylogeny. Analyses were conducted using both Bayesian inference and parsimony methods on the data sets separately and in combination. The resulting phylogenies are congruent with all well supported clades of Rosoideae found in previous analyses of ITS or rbcL data. The support for these and other clades is improved and we consider several clades supported well enough to be named. The following clades are given phylogenetic definitions: Sanguisorbeae and its subclades Agrimoniinae and Sanguisorbinae, Potentilleae and its subclades Fragariinae and Potentilla, Roperculina (Rosa + Sanguisorbeae + Potentilleae), and Sanpotina (Sanguisorbeae + Potentilleae). Potentilla includes the P. anserina clade (Argentina) in our trnL/F and combined analyses, but this relationship is not resolved by ITS alone. The previously used genera Duchesnea (P. indica), Horkelia, and Ivesia are strongly supported as nested within Potentilla. Comarum (P. palustris and P. salesowianum), Sibbaldiopsis (P. tridentata), Dasiphora (P. fruticosa), and Drymocallis (P. arguta) join Alchemilla, Aphanes, Sibbaldia, Chamaerhodos, and Fragaria in the well supported Fragariinae clade outside of Potentilla. The monophyly of both Potentilleae and Sanguisorbeae is well supported, and the clades correspond to previously named tribes with the exception of Alchemilla and its segregate Aphanes which are nested within Potentilleae instead of in Sanguisorbeae. The position of Rubus is still not securely resolved.

About this resource

• Canonical resource URI: http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S982
• Other versions: Nexus NeXML
• Show BibTeX reference

  		@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref15374,
  	 author = {Torsten  Eriksson and M. S.  Hibbs and Anne D Yoder and Charles F.  Delwiche and Michael J Donoghue},
  	 title = {The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL/F region of Chloroplast DNA.},
  	 year = {2003},
  	 keywords = {},
  	 doi = {},
  	 url = {},
  	 pmid = {},
  	 journal = {International Journal of Plant Sciences},
  	 volume = {164},
  	 number = {2},
  	 pages = {},
  	 abstract = {The phylogeny of Rosoideae was investigated using 44 species. Here we report new sequence data from the chloroplast trnL?trnF region as well as an increased sample of species. The analysis of these new data, along with previously used data from the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), significantly increased resolution as well as confidence for Rosoideae phylogeny. Analyses were conducted using both Bayesian inference and parsimony methods on the data sets separately and in combination. The resulting phylogenies are congruent with all well supported clades of Rosoideae found in previous analyses of ITS or rbcL data. The support for these and other clades is improved and we consider several clades supported well enough to be named. The following clades are given phylogenetic definitions: Sanguisorbeae and its subclades Agrimoniinae and Sanguisorbinae, Potentilleae and its subclades Fragariinae and Potentilla, Roperculina (Rosa + Sanguisorbeae + Potentilleae), and Sanpotina (Sanguisorbeae + Potentilleae). Potentilla includes the P. anserina clade (Argentina) in our trnL/F and combined analyses, but this relationship is not resolved by ITS alone. The previously used genera Duchesnea (P. indica), Horkelia, and Ivesia are strongly supported as nested within Potentilla. Comarum (P. palustris and P. salesowianum), Sibbaldiopsis (P. tridentata), Dasiphora (P. fruticosa), and Drymocallis (P. arguta) join Alchemilla, Aphanes, Sibbaldia, Chamaerhodos, and Fragaria in the well supported Fragariinae clade outside of Potentilla. The monophyly of both Potentilleae and Sanguisorbeae is well supported, and the clades correspond to previously named tribes with the exception of Alchemilla and its segregate Aphanes which are nested within Potentilleae instead of in Sanguisorbeae. The position of Rubus is still not securely resolved.}
  }
  		

• Show RIS reference

  		TY  - JOUR
  ID  - 15374
  AU  - Eriksson,Torsten 
  AU  - Hibbs,M. S. 
  AU  - Yoder,Anne D
  AU  - Delwiche,Charles F. 
  AU  - Donoghue,Michael J
  T1  - The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL/F region of Chloroplast DNA.
  PY  - 2003
  KW  - 
  UR  - 
  N2  - The phylogeny of Rosoideae was investigated using 44 species. Here we report new sequence data from the chloroplast trnL?trnF region as well as an increased sample of species. The analysis of these new data, along with previously used data from the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), significantly increased resolution as well as confidence for Rosoideae phylogeny. Analyses were conducted using both Bayesian inference and parsimony methods on the data sets separately and in combination. The resulting phylogenies are congruent with all well supported clades of Rosoideae found in previous analyses of ITS or rbcL data. The support for these and other clades is improved and we consider several clades supported well enough to be named. The following clades are given phylogenetic definitions: Sanguisorbeae and its subclades Agrimoniinae and Sanguisorbinae, Potentilleae and its subclades Fragariinae and Potentilla, Roperculina (Rosa + Sanguisorbeae + Potentilleae), and Sanpotina (Sanguisorbeae + Potentilleae). Potentilla includes the P. anserina clade (Argentina) in our trnL/F and combined analyses, but this relationship is not resolved by ITS alone. The previously used genera Duchesnea (P. indica), Horkelia, and Ivesia are strongly supported as nested within Potentilla. Comarum (P. palustris and P. salesowianum), Sibbaldiopsis (P. tridentata), Dasiphora (P. fruticosa), and Drymocallis (P. arguta) join Alchemilla, Aphanes, Sibbaldia, Chamaerhodos, and Fragaria in the well supported Fragariinae clade outside of Potentilla. The monophyly of both Potentilleae and Sanguisorbeae is well supported, and the clades correspond to previously named tribes with the exception of Alchemilla and its segregate Aphanes which are nested within Potentilleae instead of in Sanguisorbeae. The position of Rubus is still not securely resolved.
  L3  - 
  JF  - International Journal of Plant Sciences
  VL  - 164
  IS  - 2
  ER  -