@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref23010,
author = {Evan Scott Wong and Gregory A. Dahlem and Trevor Stamper and Ron DeBry},
title = {Discordance between morphological species identification and mtDNA phylogeny in the flesh fly genus Ravinia (Diptera: Sarcophagidae).},
year = {2015},
keywords = {COI, COII, Chaetoravinia, morphology, phylogenetics },
doi = {},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/IS14018},
pmid = {},
journal = {Invertebrate Systematics},
volume = {29},
number = {},
pages = {1--11},
abstract = {In order to better understand the phylogenetic relationships among species in the genus Ravinia Robineau-
Desvoidy, 1863, we analysed data from two mitochondrial gene fragments: cytochrome oxidase I (COI) and cytochrome
oxidase II (COII). We used Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood methods to infer phylogenetic relationships.
Our results indicate that the genera Ravinia and Chaetoravinia, previously synonymised into the genus Ravinia (sensu lato)
are each likely to be monophyletic (posterior probability 1; bootstrap support 85%). We found highly supported
paraphyletic relationships among species of Ravinia, with relatively deep splits in the phylogeny. This conflict between
the morphological species definitions and the mtDNA phylogeny could be indicative of the presence of cryptic species in
Ravinia anxia (Walker, 1849), Ravinia floridensis (Aldrich, 1916), Ravinia lherminieri (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), and
Ravinia querula (Walker, 1849).}
}
Citation for Study 15566
Citation title:
"Discordance between morphological species identification and mtDNA phylogeny in the flesh fly genus Ravinia (Diptera: Sarcophagidae).".
Study name:
"Discordance between morphological species identification and mtDNA phylogeny in the flesh fly genus Ravinia (Diptera: Sarcophagidae).".
This study is part of submission 15566
(Status: Published).
Citation
Wong E.S., Dahlem G.A., Stamper T., & Debry R. 2015. Discordance between morphological species identification and mtDNA phylogeny in the flesh fly genus Ravinia (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Invertebrate Systematics, 29: 1-11.
Authors
-
Wong E.S.
(submitter)
513-805-1848
-
Dahlem G.A.
-
Stamper T.
-
Debry R.
Abstract
In order to better understand the phylogenetic relationships among species in the genus Ravinia Robineau-
Desvoidy, 1863, we analysed data from two mitochondrial gene fragments: cytochrome oxidase I (COI) and cytochrome
oxidase II (COII). We used Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood methods to infer phylogenetic relationships.
Our results indicate that the genera Ravinia and Chaetoravinia, previously synonymised into the genus Ravinia (sensu lato)
are each likely to be monophyletic (posterior probability 1; bootstrap support 85%). We found highly supported
paraphyletic relationships among species of Ravinia, with relatively deep splits in the phylogeny. This conflict between
the morphological species definitions and the mtDNA phylogeny could be indicative of the presence of cryptic species in
Ravinia anxia (Walker, 1849), Ravinia floridensis (Aldrich, 1916), Ravinia lherminieri (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), and
Ravinia querula (Walker, 1849).
Keywords
COI, COII, Chaetoravinia, morphology, phylogenetics
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S15566
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref23010,
author = {Evan Scott Wong and Gregory A. Dahlem and Trevor Stamper and Ron DeBry},
title = {Discordance between morphological species identification and mtDNA phylogeny in the flesh fly genus Ravinia (Diptera: Sarcophagidae).},
year = {2015},
keywords = {COI, COII, Chaetoravinia, morphology, phylogenetics },
doi = {},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/IS14018},
pmid = {},
journal = {Invertebrate Systematics},
volume = {29},
number = {},
pages = {1--11},
abstract = {In order to better understand the phylogenetic relationships among species in the genus Ravinia Robineau-
Desvoidy, 1863, we analysed data from two mitochondrial gene fragments: cytochrome oxidase I (COI) and cytochrome
oxidase II (COII). We used Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood methods to infer phylogenetic relationships.
Our results indicate that the genera Ravinia and Chaetoravinia, previously synonymised into the genus Ravinia (sensu lato)
are each likely to be monophyletic (posterior probability 1; bootstrap support 85%). We found highly supported
paraphyletic relationships among species of Ravinia, with relatively deep splits in the phylogeny. This conflict between
the morphological species definitions and the mtDNA phylogeny could be indicative of the presence of cryptic species in
Ravinia anxia (Walker, 1849), Ravinia floridensis (Aldrich, 1916), Ravinia lherminieri (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), and
Ravinia querula (Walker, 1849).}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 23010
AU - Wong,Evan Scott
AU - Dahlem,Gregory A.
AU - Stamper,Trevor
AU - DeBry,Ron
T1 - Discordance between morphological species identification and mtDNA phylogeny in the flesh fly genus Ravinia (Diptera: Sarcophagidae).
PY - 2015
KW - COI
KW - COII
KW - Chaetoravinia
KW - morphology
KW - phylogenetics
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/IS14018
N2 - In order to better understand the phylogenetic relationships among species in the genus Ravinia Robineau-
Desvoidy, 1863, we analysed data from two mitochondrial gene fragments: cytochrome oxidase I (COI) and cytochrome
oxidase II (COII). We used Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood methods to infer phylogenetic relationships.
Our results indicate that the genera Ravinia and Chaetoravinia, previously synonymised into the genus Ravinia (sensu lato)
are each likely to be monophyletic (posterior probability 1; bootstrap support 85%). We found highly supported
paraphyletic relationships among species of Ravinia, with relatively deep splits in the phylogeny. This conflict between
the morphological species definitions and the mtDNA phylogeny could be indicative of the presence of cryptic species in
Ravinia anxia (Walker, 1849), Ravinia floridensis (Aldrich, 1916), Ravinia lherminieri (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830), and
Ravinia querula (Walker, 1849).
L3 -
JF - Invertebrate Systematics
VL - 29
IS -
SP - 1
EP - 11
ER -