@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref15372,
author = {Torsten Eriksson and Michael J Donoghue and M. S. Hibbs},
title = {Phylogenetic analysis of Potentilla using DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), and implications for the classification of Rosoideae (Rosaceae).},
year = {1998},
keywords = {Rosaceae?Rosoideae?Potentilla; Fragaria; Duchesnea; Phylogeny; classification; phylogenetic nomenclature; ribosomal DNA, ITS},
doi = {10.1007/BF00985357},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Plant Systematics and Evolution},
volume = {211},
number = {},
pages = {155--179},
abstract = {The circumscription of Potentilla has varied widely. To investigate the
monophyly of Potentilla and the phylogenetic relationships of associated genera we used nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) DNA sequences. Fourteen species of
Potentilla (sensu WOLF 1908) were included, some of which represent proposed segregate genera (such as Argentina, Comarum, Drymocallis, Duchesnea, Pentaphylloides, and
Sibbaldiopsis), and 17 other genera of Rosoideae, using Prunus as outgroup. Out most parsimonious tree strongly implies that Potentilla is not monophyletic. Forcing the monophyly of Potentilla yields distinctly longer trees. Several morphological features
appear to have evolved several times independently, including the swollen receptacle ("strawberry") and temate leaves. In order to minimise nomenclatural change and to name
only well supported clades, Potentilla should be split into several genera, while other previously recognised genera such as Duchesnea, Horkelia, and Ivesia are best included in Potentilla. We suggest, however, that a phylogenetic nomenclature (sensu DE QuEraoz & GAUTHIEU 1994) might be a better solution.}
}
Citation for Study 261
Citation title:
"Phylogenetic analysis of Potentilla using DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), and implications for the classification of Rosoideae (Rosaceae).".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S2x14x97c16c11c45
(Status: Published).
Citation
Eriksson T., Donoghue M.J., & Hibbs M. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of Potentilla using DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), and implications for the classification of Rosoideae (Rosaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 211: 155-179.
Authors
-
Eriksson T.
-
Donoghue M.J.
-
Hibbs M.
Abstract
The circumscription of Potentilla has varied widely. To investigate the
monophyly of Potentilla and the phylogenetic relationships of associated genera we used nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) DNA sequences. Fourteen species of
Potentilla (sensu WOLF 1908) were included, some of which represent proposed segregate genera (such as Argentina, Comarum, Drymocallis, Duchesnea, Pentaphylloides, and
Sibbaldiopsis), and 17 other genera of Rosoideae, using Prunus as outgroup. Out most parsimonious tree strongly implies that Potentilla is not monophyletic. Forcing the monophyly of Potentilla yields distinctly longer trees. Several morphological features
appear to have evolved several times independently, including the swollen receptacle ("strawberry") and temate leaves. In order to minimise nomenclatural change and to name
only well supported clades, Potentilla should be split into several genera, while other previously recognised genera such as Duchesnea, Horkelia, and Ivesia are best included in Potentilla. We suggest, however, that a phylogenetic nomenclature (sensu DE QuEraoz & GAUTHIEU 1994) might be a better solution.
Keywords
Rosaceae?Rosoideae?Potentilla; Fragaria; Duchesnea; Phylogeny; classification; phylogenetic nomenclature; ribosomal DNA, ITS
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S261
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref15372,
author = {Torsten Eriksson and Michael J Donoghue and M. S. Hibbs},
title = {Phylogenetic analysis of Potentilla using DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), and implications for the classification of Rosoideae (Rosaceae).},
year = {1998},
keywords = {Rosaceae?Rosoideae?Potentilla; Fragaria; Duchesnea; Phylogeny; classification; phylogenetic nomenclature; ribosomal DNA, ITS},
doi = {10.1007/BF00985357},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Plant Systematics and Evolution},
volume = {211},
number = {},
pages = {155--179},
abstract = {The circumscription of Potentilla has varied widely. To investigate the
monophyly of Potentilla and the phylogenetic relationships of associated genera we used nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) DNA sequences. Fourteen species of
Potentilla (sensu WOLF 1908) were included, some of which represent proposed segregate genera (such as Argentina, Comarum, Drymocallis, Duchesnea, Pentaphylloides, and
Sibbaldiopsis), and 17 other genera of Rosoideae, using Prunus as outgroup. Out most parsimonious tree strongly implies that Potentilla is not monophyletic. Forcing the monophyly of Potentilla yields distinctly longer trees. Several morphological features
appear to have evolved several times independently, including the swollen receptacle ("strawberry") and temate leaves. In order to minimise nomenclatural change and to name
only well supported clades, Potentilla should be split into several genera, while other previously recognised genera such as Duchesnea, Horkelia, and Ivesia are best included in Potentilla. We suggest, however, that a phylogenetic nomenclature (sensu DE QuEraoz & GAUTHIEU 1994) might be a better solution.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 15372
AU - Eriksson,Torsten
AU - Donoghue,Michael J
AU - Hibbs,M. S.
T1 - Phylogenetic analysis of Potentilla using DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), and implications for the classification of Rosoideae (Rosaceae).
PY - 1998
KW - Rosaceae?Rosoideae?Potentilla; Fragaria; Duchesnea; Phylogeny; classification; phylogenetic nomenclature; ribosomal DNA
KW - ITS
UR -
N2 - The circumscription of Potentilla has varied widely. To investigate the
monophyly of Potentilla and the phylogenetic relationships of associated genera we used nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) DNA sequences. Fourteen species of
Potentilla (sensu WOLF 1908) were included, some of which represent proposed segregate genera (such as Argentina, Comarum, Drymocallis, Duchesnea, Pentaphylloides, and
Sibbaldiopsis), and 17 other genera of Rosoideae, using Prunus as outgroup. Out most parsimonious tree strongly implies that Potentilla is not monophyletic. Forcing the monophyly of Potentilla yields distinctly longer trees. Several morphological features
appear to have evolved several times independently, including the swollen receptacle ("strawberry") and temate leaves. In order to minimise nomenclatural change and to name
only well supported clades, Potentilla should be split into several genera, while other previously recognised genera such as Duchesnea, Horkelia, and Ivesia are best included in Potentilla. We suggest, however, that a phylogenetic nomenclature (sensu DE QuEraoz & GAUTHIEU 1994) might be a better solution.
L3 - 10.1007/BF00985357
JF - Plant Systematics and Evolution
VL - 211
IS -
SP - 155
EP - 179
ER -