@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref19495,
author = {Shudong Zhang and Douglas E. Soltis and Dezhu Li and Yang Yang and Tingshuang Yi},
title = {Multi-gene analysis provides a well-supported phylogeny of Rosales},
year = {2011},
keywords = {Barbeyaceae, Dirachmaceae, Phylogenetics, Rosales},
doi = {10.1016/j.ympev.2011.04.008},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790311001928},
pmid = {},
journal = {Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution},
volume = {60},
number = {1},
pages = {21--8},
abstract = {Despite many attempts to resolve evolutionary relationships among the major clades of Rosales, some nodes have been extremely problematic and have remained unresolved. In this study, we use two nuclear and 10 plastid loci to infer phylogenetic relationships among all nine families of Rosales. Rosales were strongly supported as monophyletic; within Rosales all family relationships are well-supported with Rosaceae sister to all other members of the order. Remaining Rosales can be divided into two subclades: 1) Ulmaceae are sister to Cannabaceae plus (Urticaceae + Moraceae); 2). Rhamnaceae are sister to Elaeagnaceae plus (Barbeyaceae + Dirachmaceae). One noteworthy result is that we recover the first strong support for a sister relationship between the enigmatic Dirachmaceae and Barbeyaceae. These two small, enigmatic families have distinct morphologies and potential synapomorphies remain unclear. Future studies should try to identify nonDNA synapomorphies uniting Barbeyaceae with Dirachmaceae.}
}
Citation for Study 11237
Citation title:
"Multi-gene analysis provides a well-supported phylogeny of Rosales".
Study name:
"Multi-gene analysis provides a well-supported phylogeny of Rosales".
This study is part of submission 11227
(Status: Published).
Citation
Zhang S., Soltis D., Li D., Yang Y., & Yi T. 2011. Multi-gene analysis provides a well-supported phylogeny of Rosales. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 60(1): 21-8.
Authors
-
Zhang S.
(submitter)
868715223137
-
Soltis D.
-
Li D.
-
Yang Y.
-
Yi T.
Abstract
Despite many attempts to resolve evolutionary relationships among the major clades of Rosales, some nodes have been extremely problematic and have remained unresolved. In this study, we use two nuclear and 10 plastid loci to infer phylogenetic relationships among all nine families of Rosales. Rosales were strongly supported as monophyletic; within Rosales all family relationships are well-supported with Rosaceae sister to all other members of the order. Remaining Rosales can be divided into two subclades: 1) Ulmaceae are sister to Cannabaceae plus (Urticaceae + Moraceae); 2). Rhamnaceae are sister to Elaeagnaceae plus (Barbeyaceae + Dirachmaceae). One noteworthy result is that we recover the first strong support for a sister relationship between the enigmatic Dirachmaceae and Barbeyaceae. These two small, enigmatic families have distinct morphologies and potential synapomorphies remain unclear. Future studies should try to identify nonDNA synapomorphies uniting Barbeyaceae with Dirachmaceae.
Keywords
Barbeyaceae, Dirachmaceae, Phylogenetics, Rosales
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S11237
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref19495,
author = {Shudong Zhang and Douglas E. Soltis and Dezhu Li and Yang Yang and Tingshuang Yi},
title = {Multi-gene analysis provides a well-supported phylogeny of Rosales},
year = {2011},
keywords = {Barbeyaceae, Dirachmaceae, Phylogenetics, Rosales},
doi = {10.1016/j.ympev.2011.04.008},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790311001928},
pmid = {},
journal = {Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution},
volume = {60},
number = {1},
pages = {21--8},
abstract = {Despite many attempts to resolve evolutionary relationships among the major clades of Rosales, some nodes have been extremely problematic and have remained unresolved. In this study, we use two nuclear and 10 plastid loci to infer phylogenetic relationships among all nine families of Rosales. Rosales were strongly supported as monophyletic; within Rosales all family relationships are well-supported with Rosaceae sister to all other members of the order. Remaining Rosales can be divided into two subclades: 1) Ulmaceae are sister to Cannabaceae plus (Urticaceae + Moraceae); 2). Rhamnaceae are sister to Elaeagnaceae plus (Barbeyaceae + Dirachmaceae). One noteworthy result is that we recover the first strong support for a sister relationship between the enigmatic Dirachmaceae and Barbeyaceae. These two small, enigmatic families have distinct morphologies and potential synapomorphies remain unclear. Future studies should try to identify nonDNA synapomorphies uniting Barbeyaceae with Dirachmaceae.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 19495
AU - Zhang,Shudong
AU - Soltis,Douglas E.
AU - Li,Dezhu
AU - Yang,Yang
AU - Yi,Tingshuang
T1 - Multi-gene analysis provides a well-supported phylogeny of Rosales
PY - 2011
KW - Barbeyaceae
KW - Dirachmaceae
KW - Phylogenetics
KW - Rosales
UR - http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790311001928
N2 - Despite many attempts to resolve evolutionary relationships among the major clades of Rosales, some nodes have been extremely problematic and have remained unresolved. In this study, we use two nuclear and 10 plastid loci to infer phylogenetic relationships among all nine families of Rosales. Rosales were strongly supported as monophyletic; within Rosales all family relationships are well-supported with Rosaceae sister to all other members of the order. Remaining Rosales can be divided into two subclades: 1) Ulmaceae are sister to Cannabaceae plus (Urticaceae + Moraceae); 2). Rhamnaceae are sister to Elaeagnaceae plus (Barbeyaceae + Dirachmaceae). One noteworthy result is that we recover the first strong support for a sister relationship between the enigmatic Dirachmaceae and Barbeyaceae. These two small, enigmatic families have distinct morphologies and potential synapomorphies remain unclear. Future studies should try to identify nonDNA synapomorphies uniting Barbeyaceae with Dirachmaceae.
L3 - 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.04.008
JF - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
VL - 60
IS - 1
SP - 21
EP - 8
ER -