@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref22618,
author = {Dolores Gonz?lez and Marianela Rodriguez-Carres and Teun Boekhout and Joost A Stalpers and Eiko E Kuramae and Andreia Kazumi Nakatani and Rytas Vilgalys and Marc Anthony Cubeta},
title = {Phylogenetic Relationships of Rhizoctonia Fungi within the Cantharellales.},
year = {2016},
keywords = {Fungal plant pathogens, Multi-locus phylogeny, Rhizoctonia anamorphs, Rhizoctonia solani},
doi = {},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2016.01.012},
pmid = {},
journal = {Fungal Biology},
volume = {120},
number = {4},
pages = {603--619},
abstract = {Phylogenetic relationships of Rhizoctonia fungi within the order Cantharellales were studied using sequence data from portions of the ribosomal DNA cluster regions ITS-LSU, rpb2, tef1, and atp6 for 50 taxa, and public sequence data from the rpb2 locus for 165 taxa. Data sets were analysed individually and combined using Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood, and Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference methods. All analyses supported the monophyly of the family Ceratobasidiaceae, which comprises the genera Ceratobasidium and Thanatephorus. Multi-locus analysis revealed 10 well-supported monophyletic groups that were consistent with previous separation into anastomosis groups based on hyphal fusion criteria. This analysis coupled with analyses of a larger sample of 165 rpb2 sequences of fungi in the Cantharellales supported a sister relationship between the Botryobasidiaceae and Ceratobasidiaceae and a sister relationship of the Tulasnellaceae with the rest of the Cantharellales. The inclusion of additional sequence data did not clarify incongruences observed in previous studies of Rhizoctonia fungi in the Cantharellales based on analyses of a single or multiple genes. The diversity of ecological and morphological characters associated with these fungi requires further investigation on character evolution for reevaluating homologous and homoplasious characters.}
}
Citation for Study 15006
Citation title:
"Phylogenetic Relationships of Rhizoctonia Fungi within the Cantharellales.".
Study name:
"Phylogenetic Relationships of Rhizoctonia Fungi within the Cantharellales.".
This study is part of submission 15006
(Status: Published).
Citation
Gonz?lez D., Rodriguez-carres M., Boekhout T., Stalpers J.A., Kuramae E.E., Nakatani A.K., Vilgalys R., & Cubeta M.A. 2016. Phylogenetic Relationships of Rhizoctonia Fungi within the Cantharellales. Fungal Biology, 120(4): 603-619.
Authors
-
Gonz?lez D.
(submitter)
+52 012288421800
-
Rodriguez-carres M.
-
Boekhout T.
-
Stalpers J.A.
-
Kuramae E.E.
-
Nakatani A.K.
-
Vilgalys R.
-
Cubeta M.A.
Abstract
Phylogenetic relationships of Rhizoctonia fungi within the order Cantharellales were studied using sequence data from portions of the ribosomal DNA cluster regions ITS-LSU, rpb2, tef1, and atp6 for 50 taxa, and public sequence data from the rpb2 locus for 165 taxa. Data sets were analysed individually and combined using Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood, and Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference methods. All analyses supported the monophyly of the family Ceratobasidiaceae, which comprises the genera Ceratobasidium and Thanatephorus. Multi-locus analysis revealed 10 well-supported monophyletic groups that were consistent with previous separation into anastomosis groups based on hyphal fusion criteria. This analysis coupled with analyses of a larger sample of 165 rpb2 sequences of fungi in the Cantharellales supported a sister relationship between the Botryobasidiaceae and Ceratobasidiaceae and a sister relationship of the Tulasnellaceae with the rest of the Cantharellales. The inclusion of additional sequence data did not clarify incongruences observed in previous studies of Rhizoctonia fungi in the Cantharellales based on analyses of a single or multiple genes. The diversity of ecological and morphological characters associated with these fungi requires further investigation on character evolution for reevaluating homologous and homoplasious characters.
Keywords
Fungal plant pathogens, Multi-locus phylogeny, Rhizoctonia anamorphs, Rhizoctonia solani
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S15006
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref22618,
author = {Dolores Gonz?lez and Marianela Rodriguez-Carres and Teun Boekhout and Joost A Stalpers and Eiko E Kuramae and Andreia Kazumi Nakatani and Rytas Vilgalys and Marc Anthony Cubeta},
title = {Phylogenetic Relationships of Rhizoctonia Fungi within the Cantharellales.},
year = {2016},
keywords = {Fungal plant pathogens, Multi-locus phylogeny, Rhizoctonia anamorphs, Rhizoctonia solani},
doi = {},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2016.01.012},
pmid = {},
journal = {Fungal Biology},
volume = {120},
number = {4},
pages = {603--619},
abstract = {Phylogenetic relationships of Rhizoctonia fungi within the order Cantharellales were studied using sequence data from portions of the ribosomal DNA cluster regions ITS-LSU, rpb2, tef1, and atp6 for 50 taxa, and public sequence data from the rpb2 locus for 165 taxa. Data sets were analysed individually and combined using Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood, and Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference methods. All analyses supported the monophyly of the family Ceratobasidiaceae, which comprises the genera Ceratobasidium and Thanatephorus. Multi-locus analysis revealed 10 well-supported monophyletic groups that were consistent with previous separation into anastomosis groups based on hyphal fusion criteria. This analysis coupled with analyses of a larger sample of 165 rpb2 sequences of fungi in the Cantharellales supported a sister relationship between the Botryobasidiaceae and Ceratobasidiaceae and a sister relationship of the Tulasnellaceae with the rest of the Cantharellales. The inclusion of additional sequence data did not clarify incongruences observed in previous studies of Rhizoctonia fungi in the Cantharellales based on analyses of a single or multiple genes. The diversity of ecological and morphological characters associated with these fungi requires further investigation on character evolution for reevaluating homologous and homoplasious characters.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 22618
AU - Gonz?lez,Dolores
AU - Rodriguez-Carres,Marianela
AU - Boekhout,Teun
AU - Stalpers,Joost A
AU - Kuramae,Eiko E
AU - Nakatani,Andreia Kazumi
AU - Vilgalys,Rytas
AU - Cubeta,Marc Anthony
T1 - Phylogenetic Relationships of Rhizoctonia Fungi within the Cantharellales.
PY - 2016
KW - Fungal plant pathogens
KW - Multi-locus phylogeny
KW - Rhizoctonia anamorphs
KW - Rhizoctonia solani
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2016.01.012
N2 - Phylogenetic relationships of Rhizoctonia fungi within the order Cantharellales were studied using sequence data from portions of the ribosomal DNA cluster regions ITS-LSU, rpb2, tef1, and atp6 for 50 taxa, and public sequence data from the rpb2 locus for 165 taxa. Data sets were analysed individually and combined using Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood, and Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference methods. All analyses supported the monophyly of the family Ceratobasidiaceae, which comprises the genera Ceratobasidium and Thanatephorus. Multi-locus analysis revealed 10 well-supported monophyletic groups that were consistent with previous separation into anastomosis groups based on hyphal fusion criteria. This analysis coupled with analyses of a larger sample of 165 rpb2 sequences of fungi in the Cantharellales supported a sister relationship between the Botryobasidiaceae and Ceratobasidiaceae and a sister relationship of the Tulasnellaceae with the rest of the Cantharellales. The inclusion of additional sequence data did not clarify incongruences observed in previous studies of Rhizoctonia fungi in the Cantharellales based on analyses of a single or multiple genes. The diversity of ecological and morphological characters associated with these fungi requires further investigation on character evolution for reevaluating homologous and homoplasious characters.
L3 -
JF - Fungal Biology
VL - 120
IS - 4
SP - 603
EP - 619
ER -