CiteULike

Delicious

Connotea

Citation for Study 10115

Citation title: "A phylogenomic approach to resolve the basal pterygote divergence".

This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S2456 (Status: Published).

Citation

Simon S., Strauss S., Von haeseler A., & Hadrys H. 2009. A phylogenomic approach to resolve the basal pterygote divergence. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 26(12): 2719-2730.

Authors

• Simon S.
• Strauss S.
• Von haeseler A.
• Hadrys H.

Abstract

One of the most fascinating Bauplan transitions in the animal kingdom was the invention of insect wings, a change which also contributed to the success and enormous diversity of this animal group. However, the origin of insect flight and the relationships of basal winged insect orders are still controversial. Three hypotheses have been proposed to explain the phylogeny of winged insects: (i) the traditional Palaeoptera hypothesis (Ephemeroptera+Odonata, Neoptera), (ii) the Metapterygota (Ephemeroptera, Odonata+Neoptera) and (iii) the Chiastomyaria hypothesis (Odonata, Ephemeroptera+Neoptera). Neither phylogenetic analyses of single genes nor even multiple marker systems (e.g. molecular markers + morphological characters) have yet been able to conclusively resolve basal pterygote divergences. A possible explanation for the lack of resolution is that the divergences took place in the mid-Devonian within a short period of time, and attempts to solve this problem have been confounded by the major challenge of finding molecular markers to accurately track these short ancient internodes. Although phylogenomic data are available for Neoptera and some wingless (apterygote) orders, they are lacking for the crucial Odonata and Ephemeroptera orders. We adopt a multi-gene approach including data from two new EST projects from the orders Ephemeroptera (Baetis sp.) and Odonata (Ischnura elegans) to evaluate the potential of phylogenomic analyses in clarifying this unresolved issue. We analyzed two data sets that differed in represented taxa, genes and overall sequence lengths: maxspe (15 taxa, 125 genes, 31,643 amino acid positions), maxgen (8 taxa, 150 genes, 42,541 amino acid positions). Maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses both place the Odonata at the base of the winged insects. Furthermore, statistical hypotheses testing rejected both the Palaeoptera and the Metapterygota hypotheses. The comprehensive molecular data set developed here provides conclusive support for odonates as the most basal winged insect order (Chiastomyaria hypothesis). Data quality assessment indicates that proteins involved in cellular processes and signaling harbor the most informative phylogenetic signal.

External links

• DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp191

About this resource

• Canonical resource URI: http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S10115
• Other versions: Nexus NeXML
• Show BibTeX reference

  		@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref18606,
  	 author = {Sabrina  Simon and Steven H.  Strauss and Arndt  von Haeseler and Heike  Hadrys},
  	 title = {A phylogenomic approach to resolve the basal pterygote divergence},
  	 year = {2009},
  	 keywords = {},
  	 doi = {10.1093/molbev/msp191},
  	 url = {},
  	 pmid = {},
  	 journal = {Molecular Biology and Evolution},
  	 volume = {26},
  	 number = {12},
  	 pages = {2719--2730},
  	 abstract = {One of the most fascinating Bauplan transitions in the animal kingdom was the invention of insect wings, a change which also contributed to the success and enormous diversity of this animal group. However, the origin of insect flight and the relationships of basal winged insect orders are still controversial. Three hypotheses have been proposed to explain the phylogeny of winged insects: (i) the traditional Palaeoptera hypothesis (Ephemeroptera+Odonata, Neoptera), (ii) the Metapterygota (Ephemeroptera, Odonata+Neoptera) and (iii) the Chiastomyaria hypothesis (Odonata, Ephemeroptera+Neoptera). Neither phylogenetic analyses of single genes nor even multiple marker systems (e.g. molecular markers + morphological characters) have yet been able to conclusively resolve basal pterygote divergences. A possible explanation for the lack of resolution is that the divergences took place in the mid-Devonian within a short period of time, and attempts to solve this problem have been confounded by the major challenge of finding molecular markers to accurately track these short ancient internodes. Although phylogenomic data are available for Neoptera and some wingless (apterygote) orders, they are lacking for the crucial Odonata and Ephemeroptera orders. We adopt a multi-gene approach including data from two new EST projects from the orders Ephemeroptera (Baetis sp.) and Odonata (Ischnura elegans) to evaluate the potential of phylogenomic analyses in clarifying this unresolved issue. We analyzed two data sets that differed in represented taxa, genes and overall sequence lengths: maxspe (15 taxa, 125 genes, 31,643 amino acid positions), maxgen (8 taxa, 150 genes, 42,541 amino acid positions). Maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses both place the Odonata at the base of the winged insects. Furthermore, statistical hypotheses testing rejected both the Palaeoptera and the Metapterygota hypotheses. The comprehensive molecular data set developed here provides conclusive support for odonates as the most basal winged insect order (Chiastomyaria hypothesis). Data quality assessment indicates that proteins involved in cellular processes and signaling harbor the most informative phylogenetic signal.}
  }
  		

• Show RIS reference

  		TY  - JOUR
  ID  - 18606
  AU  - Simon,Sabrina 
  AU  - Strauss,Steven H. 
  AU  - von Haeseler,Arndt 
  AU  - Hadrys,Heike 
  T1  - A phylogenomic approach to resolve the basal pterygote divergence
  PY  - 2009
  UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp191
  N2  - One of the most fascinating Bauplan transitions in the animal kingdom was the invention of insect wings, a change which also contributed to the success and enormous diversity of this animal group. However, the origin of insect flight and the relationships of basal winged insect orders are still controversial. Three hypotheses have been proposed to explain the phylogeny of winged insects: (i) the traditional Palaeoptera hypothesis (Ephemeroptera+Odonata, Neoptera), (ii) the Metapterygota (Ephemeroptera, Odonata+Neoptera) and (iii) the Chiastomyaria hypothesis (Odonata, Ephemeroptera+Neoptera). Neither phylogenetic analyses of single genes nor even multiple marker systems (e.g. molecular markers + morphological characters) have yet been able to conclusively resolve basal pterygote divergences. A possible explanation for the lack of resolution is that the divergences took place in the mid-Devonian within a short period of time, and attempts to solve this problem have been confounded by the major challenge of finding molecular markers to accurately track these short ancient internodes. Although phylogenomic data are available for Neoptera and some wingless (apterygote) orders, they are lacking for the crucial Odonata and Ephemeroptera orders. We adopt a multi-gene approach including data from two new EST projects from the orders Ephemeroptera (Baetis sp.) and Odonata (Ischnura elegans) to evaluate the potential of phylogenomic analyses in clarifying this unresolved issue. We analyzed two data sets that differed in represented taxa, genes and overall sequence lengths: maxspe (15 taxa, 125 genes, 31,643 amino acid positions), maxgen (8 taxa, 150 genes, 42,541 amino acid positions). Maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses both place the Odonata at the base of the winged insects. Furthermore, statistical hypotheses testing rejected both the Palaeoptera and the Metapterygota hypotheses. The comprehensive molecular data set developed here provides conclusive support for odonates as the most basal winged insect order (Chiastomyaria hypothesis). Data quality assessment indicates that proteins involved in cellular processes and signaling harbor the most informative phylogenetic signal.
  L3  - 10.1093/molbev/msp191
  JF  - Molecular Biology and Evolution
  VL  - 26
  IS  - 12
  SP  - 2719
  EP  - 2730
  ER  -