@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref15366,
author = {R. Eriksson},
title = {Phylogeny of Cyclanthaceae.},
year = {1994},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Plant Systematics and Evolution},
volume = {190},
number = {},
pages = {31--47},
abstract = {The affinities of Cyclanthaceae are discussed, and it is concluded that the sister- group to this family is most probably Pandanaceae. A hypothesis of generic relationships in Cyclanthaceae, based on cladistic methods, is presented. Bootstrap analysis and Bremer support (decay index) have been used to test the strength of individual clades, and the result is compared with previously made phylogenetic analyses. The Sphaeradenia group (Chorigyne, Stelestylis, Sphaeradenia, and Ludovia) is supported as monophyletic and acceptably resolved, while the Asplundia group (remaining genera in Carludovicoideae) may be paraphyletic, with largely uncertain relationships. A formal recognition of these groups is therefore not justifed. The probable character evolution in Carludovicoideae is discussed.}
}
Citation for Study 112
Citation title:
"Phylogeny of Cyclanthaceae.".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S11x5x95c18c34c59
(Status: Published).
Citation
Eriksson R. 1994. Phylogeny of Cyclanthaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 190: 31-47.
Authors
Abstract
The affinities of Cyclanthaceae are discussed, and it is concluded that the sister- group to this family is most probably Pandanaceae. A hypothesis of generic relationships in Cyclanthaceae, based on cladistic methods, is presented. Bootstrap analysis and Bremer support (decay index) have been used to test the strength of individual clades, and the result is compared with previously made phylogenetic analyses. The Sphaeradenia group (Chorigyne, Stelestylis, Sphaeradenia, and Ludovia) is supported as monophyletic and acceptably resolved, while the Asplundia group (remaining genera in Carludovicoideae) may be paraphyletic, with largely uncertain relationships. A formal recognition of these groups is therefore not justifed. The probable character evolution in Carludovicoideae is discussed.
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S112
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref15366,
author = {R. Eriksson},
title = {Phylogeny of Cyclanthaceae.},
year = {1994},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Plant Systematics and Evolution},
volume = {190},
number = {},
pages = {31--47},
abstract = {The affinities of Cyclanthaceae are discussed, and it is concluded that the sister- group to this family is most probably Pandanaceae. A hypothesis of generic relationships in Cyclanthaceae, based on cladistic methods, is presented. Bootstrap analysis and Bremer support (decay index) have been used to test the strength of individual clades, and the result is compared with previously made phylogenetic analyses. The Sphaeradenia group (Chorigyne, Stelestylis, Sphaeradenia, and Ludovia) is supported as monophyletic and acceptably resolved, while the Asplundia group (remaining genera in Carludovicoideae) may be paraphyletic, with largely uncertain relationships. A formal recognition of these groups is therefore not justifed. The probable character evolution in Carludovicoideae is discussed.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 15366
AU - Eriksson,R.
T1 - Phylogeny of Cyclanthaceae.
PY - 1994
UR -
N2 - The affinities of Cyclanthaceae are discussed, and it is concluded that the sister- group to this family is most probably Pandanaceae. A hypothesis of generic relationships in Cyclanthaceae, based on cladistic methods, is presented. Bootstrap analysis and Bremer support (decay index) have been used to test the strength of individual clades, and the result is compared with previously made phylogenetic analyses. The Sphaeradenia group (Chorigyne, Stelestylis, Sphaeradenia, and Ludovia) is supported as monophyletic and acceptably resolved, while the Asplundia group (remaining genera in Carludovicoideae) may be paraphyletic, with largely uncertain relationships. A formal recognition of these groups is therefore not justifed. The probable character evolution in Carludovicoideae is discussed.
L3 -
JF - Plant Systematics and Evolution
VL - 190
IS -
SP - 31
EP - 47
ER -