CiteULike

Delicious

Connotea

Citation for Study 1825

Citation title: "Toward a resolution of campanulid phylogeny, with a special reference to the placement of Dipsacales".

This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S1799 (Status: Published).

Citation

Winkworth R.C., Lundberg J., & Donoghue M.J. 2007. Toward a resolution of campanulid phylogeny, with a special reference to the placement of Dipsacales. Taxon, null.

Authors

• Winkworth R.C.
• Lundberg J.
• Donoghue M.J.

Abstract

Broad-scale phylogenetic analyses of the angiosperms and of the Asteridae have failed to confidently resolve relationships among the major lineages of the campanulid Asteridae (i.e., the euasterid II of APG, 2003). To address this problem we assembled presently available sequences for a core set of 50 taxa, representing the diversity of the four largest lineages (i.e., Apiales, Aquifoliales, Asterales, and Dipsacales) as well as the smaller unplaced groups (e.g., Bruniaceae, Paracryphiaceae, Columelliaceae). We constructed four data matrices for phylogenetic analysis: a chloroplast coding matrix (i.e., atpB, matK, ndhF, and rbcL), a chloroplast non-coding matrix (i.e., rps16 intron, trnT-F region, and trnV-atpE IGS), a combined chloroplast data set (i.e. all seven chloroplast regions), and a combined genome matrix (i.e. seven chloroplast regions plus 18S and 26S rDNA). Bayesian analyses of these data sets using mixed substitution models produced often well-resolved and supported trees. Consistent with more weakly supported results from previous studies, our analyses support the monophyly of the four major clades and the relationships among them. Most importantly, Asterales are inferred to be sister to a clade containing Apiales and Dipsacales. Paracryphiaceae is consistently placed sister to the Dipsacales. However, the exact relationships of Bruniaceae, Columelliaceae, and an Escallonia clade depended upon the data set. Areas of poor resolution in combined analyses may be partly explained by conflict between the coding and non-coding data partitions. We discuss the implications of these results for our understanding of campanulid phylogeny and evolution, paying special attention to how our findings bear on character evolution and biogeography in Dipsacales.

About this resource

• Canonical resource URI: http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S1825
• Other versions: Nexus NeXML
• Show BibTeX reference

  		@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref18164,
  	 author = {Richard Charles Winkworth and Johannes  Lundberg and Michael J Donoghue},
  	 title = {Toward a resolution of campanulid phylogeny, with a special reference to the placement of Dipsacales},
  	 year = {2007},
  	 keywords = {},
  	 doi = {},
  	 url = {},
  	 pmid = {},
  	 journal = {Taxon},
  	 volume = {},
  	 number = {},
  	 pages = {},
  	 abstract = {Broad-scale phylogenetic analyses of the angiosperms and of the Asteridae have failed to confidently resolve relationships among the major lineages of the campanulid Asteridae (i.e., the euasterid II of APG, 2003). To address this problem we assembled presently available sequences for a core set of 50 taxa, representing the diversity of the four largest lineages (i.e., Apiales, Aquifoliales, Asterales, and Dipsacales) as well as the smaller unplaced groups (e.g., Bruniaceae, Paracryphiaceae, Columelliaceae). We constructed four data matrices for phylogenetic analysis: a chloroplast coding matrix (i.e., atpB, matK, ndhF, and rbcL), a chloroplast non-coding matrix (i.e., rps16 intron, trnT-F region, and trnV-atpE IGS), a combined chloroplast data set (i.e. all seven chloroplast regions), and a combined genome matrix (i.e. seven chloroplast regions plus 18S and 26S rDNA). Bayesian analyses of these data sets using mixed substitution models produced often well-resolved and supported trees. Consistent with more weakly supported results from previous studies, our analyses support the monophyly of the four major clades and the relationships among them. Most importantly, Asterales are inferred to be sister to a clade containing Apiales and Dipsacales. Paracryphiaceae is consistently placed sister to the Dipsacales. However, the exact relationships of Bruniaceae, Columelliaceae, and an Escallonia clade depended upon the data set. Areas of poor resolution in combined analyses may be partly explained by conflict between the coding and non-coding data partitions. We discuss the implications of these results for our understanding of campanulid phylogeny and evolution, paying special attention to how our findings bear on character evolution and biogeography in Dipsacales.}
  }
  		

• Show RIS reference

  		TY  - JOUR
  ID  - 18164
  AU  - Winkworth,Richard Charles
  AU  - Lundberg,Johannes 
  AU  - Donoghue,Michael J
  T1  - Toward a resolution of campanulid phylogeny, with a special reference to the placement of Dipsacales
  PY  - 2007
  KW  - 
  UR  - 
  N2  - Broad-scale phylogenetic analyses of the angiosperms and of the Asteridae have failed to confidently resolve relationships among the major lineages of the campanulid Asteridae (i.e., the euasterid II of APG, 2003). To address this problem we assembled presently available sequences for a core set of 50 taxa, representing the diversity of the four largest lineages (i.e., Apiales, Aquifoliales, Asterales, and Dipsacales) as well as the smaller unplaced groups (e.g., Bruniaceae, Paracryphiaceae, Columelliaceae). We constructed four data matrices for phylogenetic analysis: a chloroplast coding matrix (i.e., atpB, matK, ndhF, and rbcL), a chloroplast non-coding matrix (i.e., rps16 intron, trnT-F region, and trnV-atpE IGS), a combined chloroplast data set (i.e. all seven chloroplast regions), and a combined genome matrix (i.e. seven chloroplast regions plus 18S and 26S rDNA). Bayesian analyses of these data sets using mixed substitution models produced often well-resolved and supported trees. Consistent with more weakly supported results from previous studies, our analyses support the monophyly of the four major clades and the relationships among them. Most importantly, Asterales are inferred to be sister to a clade containing Apiales and Dipsacales. Paracryphiaceae is consistently placed sister to the Dipsacales. However, the exact relationships of Bruniaceae, Columelliaceae, and an Escallonia clade depended upon the data set. Areas of poor resolution in combined analyses may be partly explained by conflict between the coding and non-coding data partitions. We discuss the implications of these results for our understanding of campanulid phylogeny and evolution, paying special attention to how our findings bear on character evolution and biogeography in Dipsacales.
  L3  - 
  JF  - Taxon
  VL  - 
  IS  - 
  ER  -