@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref16320,
author = {Donald H. Les and Donna J. Sheridan},
title = {Hagstrom's concept of phylogenetic relationships in Potamogeton L. (Potamogetonaceae).},
year = {1990},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Taxon},
volume = {39},
number = {},
pages = {41--58},
abstract = {Hagstrom's concepts of relationships in Potamogeton, as reflected by the subgeneric, sectional, and subsectional divisions in his classification of the genus are investigated by reconstruction of an evolutionary tree deduced from phylogenetic inferences stated in his monograph. These relationships are explored in the context of results from phenetic and cladistic numerical analyses performed using characters taken from the Hagstrom monograph that are scored for 26 subsections. The Hagstrom classification represents an amalgam of phenetic and cladistic interpretations and the hierarchy does not depict accurately fundamental evolutionary relationships indicated by numerical analyses. Recommendations are provided for developing and testing evolutionary hypotheses that are independent of relationships inferred by this long-standing but problematic classification.}
}
Citation for Study 234
Citation title:
"Hagstrom's concept of phylogenetic relationships in Potamogeton L. (Potamogetonaceae).".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S2x5x96c18c28c24
(Status: Published).
Citation
Les D., & Sheridan D. 1990. Hagstrom's concept of phylogenetic relationships in Potamogeton L. (Potamogetonaceae). Taxon, 39: 41-58.
Authors
Abstract
Hagstrom's concepts of relationships in Potamogeton, as reflected by the subgeneric, sectional, and subsectional divisions in his classification of the genus are investigated by reconstruction of an evolutionary tree deduced from phylogenetic inferences stated in his monograph. These relationships are explored in the context of results from phenetic and cladistic numerical analyses performed using characters taken from the Hagstrom monograph that are scored for 26 subsections. The Hagstrom classification represents an amalgam of phenetic and cladistic interpretations and the hierarchy does not depict accurately fundamental evolutionary relationships indicated by numerical analyses. Recommendations are provided for developing and testing evolutionary hypotheses that are independent of relationships inferred by this long-standing but problematic classification.
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S234
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref16320,
author = {Donald H. Les and Donna J. Sheridan},
title = {Hagstrom's concept of phylogenetic relationships in Potamogeton L. (Potamogetonaceae).},
year = {1990},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Taxon},
volume = {39},
number = {},
pages = {41--58},
abstract = {Hagstrom's concepts of relationships in Potamogeton, as reflected by the subgeneric, sectional, and subsectional divisions in his classification of the genus are investigated by reconstruction of an evolutionary tree deduced from phylogenetic inferences stated in his monograph. These relationships are explored in the context of results from phenetic and cladistic numerical analyses performed using characters taken from the Hagstrom monograph that are scored for 26 subsections. The Hagstrom classification represents an amalgam of phenetic and cladistic interpretations and the hierarchy does not depict accurately fundamental evolutionary relationships indicated by numerical analyses. Recommendations are provided for developing and testing evolutionary hypotheses that are independent of relationships inferred by this long-standing but problematic classification.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 16320
AU - Les,Donald H.
AU - Sheridan,Donna J.
T1 - Hagstrom's concept of phylogenetic relationships in Potamogeton L. (Potamogetonaceae).
PY - 1990
UR -
N2 - Hagstrom's concepts of relationships in Potamogeton, as reflected by the subgeneric, sectional, and subsectional divisions in his classification of the genus are investigated by reconstruction of an evolutionary tree deduced from phylogenetic inferences stated in his monograph. These relationships are explored in the context of results from phenetic and cladistic numerical analyses performed using characters taken from the Hagstrom monograph that are scored for 26 subsections. The Hagstrom classification represents an amalgam of phenetic and cladistic interpretations and the hierarchy does not depict accurately fundamental evolutionary relationships indicated by numerical analyses. Recommendations are provided for developing and testing evolutionary hypotheses that are independent of relationships inferred by this long-standing but problematic classification.
L3 -
JF - Taxon
VL - 39
IS -
SP - 41
EP - 58
ER -