@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref15350,
author = {Stefan Ekman},
title = {Molecular phylogeny of the Bacidiaceae (Lecanorales, lichenized Ascomycota).},
year = {2001},
keywords = {},
doi = {10.1017/S0953756201004269},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Molecular Ecology},
volume = {105},
number = {7},
pages = {783--797},
abstract = {The phylogeny of the family Bacidiaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycota) was investigated using 65 nuclear ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 ribosomal DNA sequences, 63 of which were newly determined. After exclusion of ambiguous alignment, the data set contained 285 variable characters, 212 of which were parsimony-informative. Phylogenetic estimations were performed with maximum parsimony (unweighted and weighted) and maximum likelihood optimality criteria. Four different phylogenetic hypotheses were tested using a parametric bootstrap approach to simulate the expected null distribution of the difference between the globally optimal tree and the best (constrained) tree agreeing with the null hypotheses under unweighted and weighted parsimony, and maximum likelihood: (1) the genus Bacidia is monophyletic, (2) the genus Bacidina is monophyletic, (3) the genus Toninia is monophyletic, and (4) the family Ramalinaceae is monophyletic and distinct from a monophyletic Bacidiaceae. The monophyly of Bacidia, Toninia, and the Ramalinaceae was rejected under all circumstances. Hence, Ramalinaceae and Bacidiaceae are likely to be synonyms, Ramlinaceae being the correct name for the family. The monophyly of Bacidina was not rejected under any optimality criterion. Furthermore, the data set suggests that the Bacidia beckhausii and B. sabuletorum groups are unrelated to Bacidia s. str., that Megalaria is monophyletic, and that Lecania auct. is polyphyletic.}
}
Citation for Study 717
Citation title:
"Molecular phylogeny of the Bacidiaceae (Lecanorales, lichenized Ascomycota).".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S561
(Status: Published).
Citation
Ekman S. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of the Bacidiaceae (Lecanorales, lichenized Ascomycota). Molecular Ecology, 105(7): 783-797.
Authors
-
Ekman S.
0046 18 4712821
Abstract
The phylogeny of the family Bacidiaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycota) was investigated using 65 nuclear ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 ribosomal DNA sequences, 63 of which were newly determined. After exclusion of ambiguous alignment, the data set contained 285 variable characters, 212 of which were parsimony-informative. Phylogenetic estimations were performed with maximum parsimony (unweighted and weighted) and maximum likelihood optimality criteria. Four different phylogenetic hypotheses were tested using a parametric bootstrap approach to simulate the expected null distribution of the difference between the globally optimal tree and the best (constrained) tree agreeing with the null hypotheses under unweighted and weighted parsimony, and maximum likelihood: (1) the genus Bacidia is monophyletic, (2) the genus Bacidina is monophyletic, (3) the genus Toninia is monophyletic, and (4) the family Ramalinaceae is monophyletic and distinct from a monophyletic Bacidiaceae. The monophyly of Bacidia, Toninia, and the Ramalinaceae was rejected under all circumstances. Hence, Ramalinaceae and Bacidiaceae are likely to be synonyms, Ramlinaceae being the correct name for the family. The monophyly of Bacidina was not rejected under any optimality criterion. Furthermore, the data set suggests that the Bacidia beckhausii and B. sabuletorum groups are unrelated to Bacidia s. str., that Megalaria is monophyletic, and that Lecania auct. is polyphyletic.
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S717
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref15350,
author = {Stefan Ekman},
title = {Molecular phylogeny of the Bacidiaceae (Lecanorales, lichenized Ascomycota).},
year = {2001},
keywords = {},
doi = {10.1017/S0953756201004269},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Molecular Ecology},
volume = {105},
number = {7},
pages = {783--797},
abstract = {The phylogeny of the family Bacidiaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycota) was investigated using 65 nuclear ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 ribosomal DNA sequences, 63 of which were newly determined. After exclusion of ambiguous alignment, the data set contained 285 variable characters, 212 of which were parsimony-informative. Phylogenetic estimations were performed with maximum parsimony (unweighted and weighted) and maximum likelihood optimality criteria. Four different phylogenetic hypotheses were tested using a parametric bootstrap approach to simulate the expected null distribution of the difference between the globally optimal tree and the best (constrained) tree agreeing with the null hypotheses under unweighted and weighted parsimony, and maximum likelihood: (1) the genus Bacidia is monophyletic, (2) the genus Bacidina is monophyletic, (3) the genus Toninia is monophyletic, and (4) the family Ramalinaceae is monophyletic and distinct from a monophyletic Bacidiaceae. The monophyly of Bacidia, Toninia, and the Ramalinaceae was rejected under all circumstances. Hence, Ramalinaceae and Bacidiaceae are likely to be synonyms, Ramlinaceae being the correct name for the family. The monophyly of Bacidina was not rejected under any optimality criterion. Furthermore, the data set suggests that the Bacidia beckhausii and B. sabuletorum groups are unrelated to Bacidia s. str., that Megalaria is monophyletic, and that Lecania auct. is polyphyletic.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 15350
AU - Ekman,Stefan
T1 - Molecular phylogeny of the Bacidiaceae (Lecanorales, lichenized Ascomycota).
PY - 2001
KW -
UR -
N2 - The phylogeny of the family Bacidiaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycota) was investigated using 65 nuclear ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 ribosomal DNA sequences, 63 of which were newly determined. After exclusion of ambiguous alignment, the data set contained 285 variable characters, 212 of which were parsimony-informative. Phylogenetic estimations were performed with maximum parsimony (unweighted and weighted) and maximum likelihood optimality criteria. Four different phylogenetic hypotheses were tested using a parametric bootstrap approach to simulate the expected null distribution of the difference between the globally optimal tree and the best (constrained) tree agreeing with the null hypotheses under unweighted and weighted parsimony, and maximum likelihood: (1) the genus Bacidia is monophyletic, (2) the genus Bacidina is monophyletic, (3) the genus Toninia is monophyletic, and (4) the family Ramalinaceae is monophyletic and distinct from a monophyletic Bacidiaceae. The monophyly of Bacidia, Toninia, and the Ramalinaceae was rejected under all circumstances. Hence, Ramalinaceae and Bacidiaceae are likely to be synonyms, Ramlinaceae being the correct name for the family. The monophyly of Bacidina was not rejected under any optimality criterion. Furthermore, the data set suggests that the Bacidia beckhausii and B. sabuletorum groups are unrelated to Bacidia s. str., that Megalaria is monophyletic, and that Lecania auct. is polyphyletic.
L3 - 10.1017/S0953756201004269
JF - Molecular Ecology
VL - 105
IS - 7
SP - 783
EP - 797
ER -