@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref16202,
author = {Kim A Kristiansen and Malene Cilieborg and Lenka Dr?bkov? and Tina J?rgensen and Gitte Petersen and Ole Seberg},
title = {DNA Taxonomy: The Riddle of Oxychlo? (Juncaceae).},
year = {2005},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Systematic Botany},
volume = {30},
number = {2},
pages = {284--289},
abstract = {Recently, advocates of DNA taxonomy have complained that there is no control of the taxonomy in e.g. GenBank. This is correct, but the uncertainty may be extended to the sequences themselves. The present study shows as long as vouchers are available neither problem is fatal, but if no voucher exists bad sequences and bad taxonomy may be forever linked. Previous phylogenetic analyses of rbcL sequences have indicated that the small, south hemispheric, genus Oxychlo? (Juncaceae) surprisingly either is embedded within or sister group to the Cyperaceae. This is not in accordance with traditional or current morphological data. By studying five new accessions, representing four species of Oxychlo?, and re-examining the two vouchers of the species, O. andina, previously used in phylogenies it has been possible to show that these two sequences are erroneous. One being a chimeric sequence and the other most likely contaminated.}
}
Citation for Study 1226
Citation title:
"DNA Taxonomy: The Riddle of Oxychlo? (Juncaceae).".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S1140
(Status: Published).
Citation
Kristiansen K., Cilieborg M., Dr?bkov? L., J?rgensen T., Petersen G., & Seberg O. 2005. DNA Taxonomy: The Riddle of Oxychlo? (Juncaceae). Systematic Botany, 30(2): 284-289.
Authors
-
Kristiansen K.
-
Cilieborg M.
-
Dr?bkov? L.
-
J?rgensen T.
-
Petersen G.
4535322194
-
Seberg O.
+45 3532 2195
Abstract
Recently, advocates of DNA taxonomy have complained that there is no control of the taxonomy in e.g. GenBank. This is correct, but the uncertainty may be extended to the sequences themselves. The present study shows as long as vouchers are available neither problem is fatal, but if no voucher exists bad sequences and bad taxonomy may be forever linked. Previous phylogenetic analyses of rbcL sequences have indicated that the small, south hemispheric, genus Oxychlo? (Juncaceae) surprisingly either is embedded within or sister group to the Cyperaceae. This is not in accordance with traditional or current morphological data. By studying five new accessions, representing four species of Oxychlo?, and re-examining the two vouchers of the species, O. andina, previously used in phylogenies it has been possible to show that these two sequences are erroneous. One being a chimeric sequence and the other most likely contaminated.
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S1226
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref16202,
author = {Kim A Kristiansen and Malene Cilieborg and Lenka Dr?bkov? and Tina J?rgensen and Gitte Petersen and Ole Seberg},
title = {DNA Taxonomy: The Riddle of Oxychlo? (Juncaceae).},
year = {2005},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Systematic Botany},
volume = {30},
number = {2},
pages = {284--289},
abstract = {Recently, advocates of DNA taxonomy have complained that there is no control of the taxonomy in e.g. GenBank. This is correct, but the uncertainty may be extended to the sequences themselves. The present study shows as long as vouchers are available neither problem is fatal, but if no voucher exists bad sequences and bad taxonomy may be forever linked. Previous phylogenetic analyses of rbcL sequences have indicated that the small, south hemispheric, genus Oxychlo? (Juncaceae) surprisingly either is embedded within or sister group to the Cyperaceae. This is not in accordance with traditional or current morphological data. By studying five new accessions, representing four species of Oxychlo?, and re-examining the two vouchers of the species, O. andina, previously used in phylogenies it has been possible to show that these two sequences are erroneous. One being a chimeric sequence and the other most likely contaminated.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 16202
AU - Kristiansen,Kim A
AU - Cilieborg,Malene
AU - Dr?bkov?,Lenka
AU - J?rgensen,Tina
AU - Petersen,Gitte
AU - Seberg,Ole
T1 - DNA Taxonomy: The Riddle of Oxychlo? (Juncaceae).
PY - 2005
KW -
UR -
N2 - Recently, advocates of DNA taxonomy have complained that there is no control of the taxonomy in e.g. GenBank. This is correct, but the uncertainty may be extended to the sequences themselves. The present study shows as long as vouchers are available neither problem is fatal, but if no voucher exists bad sequences and bad taxonomy may be forever linked. Previous phylogenetic analyses of rbcL sequences have indicated that the small, south hemispheric, genus Oxychlo? (Juncaceae) surprisingly either is embedded within or sister group to the Cyperaceae. This is not in accordance with traditional or current morphological data. By studying five new accessions, representing four species of Oxychlo?, and re-examining the two vouchers of the species, O. andina, previously used in phylogenies it has been possible to show that these two sequences are erroneous. One being a chimeric sequence and the other most likely contaminated.
L3 -
JF - Systematic Botany
VL - 30
IS - 2
SP - 284
EP - 289
ER -