@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref15416,
author = {Kirsten M. Fisher},
title = {Monography and the PhyloCode: a practical example from the moss clade Leucophanella},
year = {2005},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Systematic Botany},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Here I present a cladistically based monograph of a group of closely related mosses known as the Syrrhopodon involutus complex. Monographs remain a critical and indispensable component of systematics, but traditional monographic practices require some revisions if modern monographs are to truly reflect and incorporate phylogenetic understanding. I summarize the methods used to address issues relating to sampling and the formation of OTUs for this monograph, and emphasize the importance of incorporating morphological character data in a total evidence phylogenetic analysis. In addition to a traditional Linnaean taxonomic treatment, I provide rank-free definitions of the terminal taxa in the S. involutus complex. Following the PhyloCode recommendations for the designation and naming of more inclusive taxa, I present a novel method for naming terminal taxa as least-inclusive clades. This monographic treatment represents a first attempt at applying the PhyloCode at the terminal level in any plant group, and recognizes five distinct taxa in the S. involutus complex, which I have designated with the rank-free clade name Leucophanella: banksii, borneensis, involutus, rufescens, and revolutus.}
}
Citation for Study 1371
Citation title:
"Monography and the PhyloCode: a practical example from the moss clade Leucophanella".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S1300
(Status: Published).
Citation
Fisher K. 2005. Monography and the PhyloCode: a practical example from the moss clade Leucophanella. Systematic Botany, null.
Authors
Abstract
Here I present a cladistically based monograph of a group of closely related mosses known as the Syrrhopodon involutus complex. Monographs remain a critical and indispensable component of systematics, but traditional monographic practices require some revisions if modern monographs are to truly reflect and incorporate phylogenetic understanding. I summarize the methods used to address issues relating to sampling and the formation of OTUs for this monograph, and emphasize the importance of incorporating morphological character data in a total evidence phylogenetic analysis. In addition to a traditional Linnaean taxonomic treatment, I provide rank-free definitions of the terminal taxa in the S. involutus complex. Following the PhyloCode recommendations for the designation and naming of more inclusive taxa, I present a novel method for naming terminal taxa as least-inclusive clades. This monographic treatment represents a first attempt at applying the PhyloCode at the terminal level in any plant group, and recognizes five distinct taxa in the S. involutus complex, which I have designated with the rank-free clade name Leucophanella: banksii, borneensis, involutus, rufescens, and revolutus.
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S1371
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref15416,
author = {Kirsten M. Fisher},
title = {Monography and the PhyloCode: a practical example from the moss clade Leucophanella},
year = {2005},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Systematic Botany},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Here I present a cladistically based monograph of a group of closely related mosses known as the Syrrhopodon involutus complex. Monographs remain a critical and indispensable component of systematics, but traditional monographic practices require some revisions if modern monographs are to truly reflect and incorporate phylogenetic understanding. I summarize the methods used to address issues relating to sampling and the formation of OTUs for this monograph, and emphasize the importance of incorporating morphological character data in a total evidence phylogenetic analysis. In addition to a traditional Linnaean taxonomic treatment, I provide rank-free definitions of the terminal taxa in the S. involutus complex. Following the PhyloCode recommendations for the designation and naming of more inclusive taxa, I present a novel method for naming terminal taxa as least-inclusive clades. This monographic treatment represents a first attempt at applying the PhyloCode at the terminal level in any plant group, and recognizes five distinct taxa in the S. involutus complex, which I have designated with the rank-free clade name Leucophanella: banksii, borneensis, involutus, rufescens, and revolutus.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 15416
AU - Fisher,Kirsten M.
T1 - Monography and the PhyloCode: a practical example from the moss clade Leucophanella
PY - 2005
KW -
UR -
N2 - Here I present a cladistically based monograph of a group of closely related mosses known as the Syrrhopodon involutus complex. Monographs remain a critical and indispensable component of systematics, but traditional monographic practices require some revisions if modern monographs are to truly reflect and incorporate phylogenetic understanding. I summarize the methods used to address issues relating to sampling and the formation of OTUs for this monograph, and emphasize the importance of incorporating morphological character data in a total evidence phylogenetic analysis. In addition to a traditional Linnaean taxonomic treatment, I provide rank-free definitions of the terminal taxa in the S. involutus complex. Following the PhyloCode recommendations for the designation and naming of more inclusive taxa, I present a novel method for naming terminal taxa as least-inclusive clades. This monographic treatment represents a first attempt at applying the PhyloCode at the terminal level in any plant group, and recognizes five distinct taxa in the S. involutus complex, which I have designated with the rank-free clade name Leucophanella: banksii, borneensis, involutus, rufescens, and revolutus.
L3 -
JF - Systematic Botany
VL -
IS -
ER -
Go to search
Citation
Taxa
Matrices
Trees
Analyses
