@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref2116,
author = {Liliana T. Fabbri and Gabriel Hugo Rua and Zulma E. R?golo de Agrasar and Andrea S. Vega},
title = {A Morphology-based Cladistic Analysis of Digitaria (Poaceae, Panicoideae, Paniceae).},
year = {2008},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Systematic Botany},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {A phylogenetic analysis was performed on 67 species of Digitaria belonging to four subgenera and 26 of the 32 sections recognized in Henrard's monograph. The analysis was based on 113 discrete and six continuous morphological characters. In the resulting topologies the genus Digitaria was monophyletic. In spite of the low support for most groupings, several clades were recovered. The subdivision of Digitaria in the four subgenera proposed by Henrard was not supported since the large subgenus Digitaria appears as a paraphyletic assemblage within which the other three subgenera are nested. Nevertheless, the monophyly of some of Henrard's sections was supported. This is the first approach to the phylogeny of Digitaria. KeywordsCladistic, Digitaria, Paniceae, phylogeny, Poaceae, systematics.}
}
Citation for Study 2179
Citation title:
"A Morphology-based Cladistic Analysis of Digitaria (Poaceae, Panicoideae, Paniceae).".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S2186
(Status: Published).
Citation
Fabbri L., Rua G., R?golo de agrasar Z., & Vega A. 2008. A Morphology-based Cladistic Analysis of Digitaria (Poaceae, Panicoideae, Paniceae). Systematic Botany, null.
Authors
-
Fabbri L.
-
Rua G.
-
R?golo de agrasar Z.
-
Vega A.
Abstract
A phylogenetic analysis was performed on 67 species of Digitaria belonging to four subgenera and 26 of the 32 sections recognized in Henrard's monograph. The analysis was based on 113 discrete and six continuous morphological characters. In the resulting topologies the genus Digitaria was monophyletic. In spite of the low support for most groupings, several clades were recovered. The subdivision of Digitaria in the four subgenera proposed by Henrard was not supported since the large subgenus Digitaria appears as a paraphyletic assemblage within which the other three subgenera are nested. Nevertheless, the monophyly of some of Henrard's sections was supported. This is the first approach to the phylogeny of Digitaria. KeywordsCladistic, Digitaria, Paniceae, phylogeny, Poaceae, systematics.
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S2179
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref2116,
author = {Liliana T. Fabbri and Gabriel Hugo Rua and Zulma E. R?golo de Agrasar and Andrea S. Vega},
title = {A Morphology-based Cladistic Analysis of Digitaria (Poaceae, Panicoideae, Paniceae).},
year = {2008},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Systematic Botany},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {A phylogenetic analysis was performed on 67 species of Digitaria belonging to four subgenera and 26 of the 32 sections recognized in Henrard's monograph. The analysis was based on 113 discrete and six continuous morphological characters. In the resulting topologies the genus Digitaria was monophyletic. In spite of the low support for most groupings, several clades were recovered. The subdivision of Digitaria in the four subgenera proposed by Henrard was not supported since the large subgenus Digitaria appears as a paraphyletic assemblage within which the other three subgenera are nested. Nevertheless, the monophyly of some of Henrard's sections was supported. This is the first approach to the phylogeny of Digitaria. KeywordsCladistic, Digitaria, Paniceae, phylogeny, Poaceae, systematics.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 2116
AU - Fabbri,Liliana T.
AU - Rua,Gabriel Hugo
AU - R?golo de Agrasar,Zulma E.
AU - Vega,Andrea S.
T1 - A Morphology-based Cladistic Analysis of Digitaria (Poaceae, Panicoideae, Paniceae).
PY - 2008
KW -
UR -
N2 - A phylogenetic analysis was performed on 67 species of Digitaria belonging to four subgenera and 26 of the 32 sections recognized in Henrard's monograph. The analysis was based on 113 discrete and six continuous morphological characters. In the resulting topologies the genus Digitaria was monophyletic. In spite of the low support for most groupings, several clades were recovered. The subdivision of Digitaria in the four subgenera proposed by Henrard was not supported since the large subgenus Digitaria appears as a paraphyletic assemblage within which the other three subgenera are nested. Nevertheless, the monophyly of some of Henrard's sections was supported. This is the first approach to the phylogeny of Digitaria. KeywordsCladistic, Digitaria, Paniceae, phylogeny, Poaceae, systematics.
L3 -
JF - Systematic Botany
VL -
IS -
ER -