@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref20136,
author = {Tomoaki Nishiyama and Paul G Wolf and Masanori Kugita and Robert B Sinclair and Mamoru Sugita and Chika Sugiura and Tatsuya Wakasugi and Kyoji Yamada and Koichi Yoshinaga and Kazuo Yamaguchi and Kunihiko Ueda and Mitsuyasu Hasebe},
title = {Chloroplast Phylogeny Indicates that Bryophytes are Monophyletic.},
year = {2004},
keywords = {},
doi = {10.1093/molbev/msh203},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {Molecular Biology and Evolution},
volume = {21},
number = {10},
pages = {1813--1819},
abstract = {Opinions on the basal relationship of land plants vary considerably and no phylogenetic tree with significant statistical support has been obtained. Here, we report phylogenetic analyses using 51 genes from the entire chloroplast genome sequences of 20 representative green plant species. The analyses, using translated amino acid sequences, indicated that extant bryophytes (mosses, liverworts, and hornworts) form a monophyletic group with high statistical confidence and that extant bryophytes are likely sisters to extant vascular plants, although the support for monophyletic vascular plants was not strong. Analyses at the nucleotide level could not resolve the basal relationship with statistical confidence. Bryophyte monophyly inferred using amino acid sequences has a good statistical foundation and is not rejected statistically by other data sets. We propose bryophyte monophyly as the currently best hypothesis.}
}
Citation for Study 12032
Citation title:
"Chloroplast Phylogeny Indicates that Bryophytes are Monophyletic.".
Study name:
"Chloroplast Phylogeny Indicates that Bryophytes are Monophyletic.".
This study is part of submission 12032
(Status: Published).
Citation
Nishiyama T., Wolf P.G., Kugita M., Sinclair R.B., Sugita M., Sugiura C., Wakasugi T., Yamada K., Yoshinaga K., Yamaguchi K., Ueda K., & Hasebe M. 2004. Chloroplast Phylogeny Indicates that Bryophytes are Monophyletic. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 21(10): 1813-1819.
Authors
-
Nishiyama T.
-
Wolf P.G.
-
Kugita M.
-
Sinclair R.B.
-
Sugita M.
-
Sugiura C.
-
Wakasugi T.
-
Yamada K.
-
Yoshinaga K.
-
Yamaguchi K.
-
Ueda K.
-
Hasebe M.
Abstract
Opinions on the basal relationship of land plants vary considerably and no phylogenetic tree with significant statistical support has been obtained. Here, we report phylogenetic analyses using 51 genes from the entire chloroplast genome sequences of 20 representative green plant species. The analyses, using translated amino acid sequences, indicated that extant bryophytes (mosses, liverworts, and hornworts) form a monophyletic group with high statistical confidence and that extant bryophytes are likely sisters to extant vascular plants, although the support for monophyletic vascular plants was not strong. Analyses at the nucleotide level could not resolve the basal relationship with statistical confidence. Bryophyte monophyly inferred using amino acid sequences has a good statistical foundation and is not rejected statistically by other data sets. We propose bryophyte monophyly as the currently best hypothesis.
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S12032
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref20136,
author = {Tomoaki Nishiyama and Paul G Wolf and Masanori Kugita and Robert B Sinclair and Mamoru Sugita and Chika Sugiura and Tatsuya Wakasugi and Kyoji Yamada and Koichi Yoshinaga and Kazuo Yamaguchi and Kunihiko Ueda and Mitsuyasu Hasebe},
title = {Chloroplast Phylogeny Indicates that Bryophytes are Monophyletic.},
year = {2004},
keywords = {},
doi = {10.1093/molbev/msh203},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {Molecular Biology and Evolution},
volume = {21},
number = {10},
pages = {1813--1819},
abstract = {Opinions on the basal relationship of land plants vary considerably and no phylogenetic tree with significant statistical support has been obtained. Here, we report phylogenetic analyses using 51 genes from the entire chloroplast genome sequences of 20 representative green plant species. The analyses, using translated amino acid sequences, indicated that extant bryophytes (mosses, liverworts, and hornworts) form a monophyletic group with high statistical confidence and that extant bryophytes are likely sisters to extant vascular plants, although the support for monophyletic vascular plants was not strong. Analyses at the nucleotide level could not resolve the basal relationship with statistical confidence. Bryophyte monophyly inferred using amino acid sequences has a good statistical foundation and is not rejected statistically by other data sets. We propose bryophyte monophyly as the currently best hypothesis.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 20136
AU - Nishiyama,Tomoaki
AU - Wolf,Paul G
AU - Kugita,Masanori
AU - Sinclair,Robert B
AU - Sugita,Mamoru
AU - Sugiura,Chika
AU - Wakasugi,Tatsuya
AU - Yamada,Kyoji
AU - Yoshinaga,Koichi
AU - Yamaguchi,Kazuo
AU - Ueda,Kunihiko
AU - Hasebe,Mitsuyasu
T1 - Chloroplast Phylogeny Indicates that Bryophytes are Monophyletic.
PY - 2004
KW -
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msh203
N2 - Opinions on the basal relationship of land plants vary considerably and no phylogenetic tree with significant statistical support has been obtained. Here, we report phylogenetic analyses using 51 genes from the entire chloroplast genome sequences of 20 representative green plant species. The analyses, using translated amino acid sequences, indicated that extant bryophytes (mosses, liverworts, and hornworts) form a monophyletic group with high statistical confidence and that extant bryophytes are likely sisters to extant vascular plants, although the support for monophyletic vascular plants was not strong. Analyses at the nucleotide level could not resolve the basal relationship with statistical confidence. Bryophyte monophyly inferred using amino acid sequences has a good statistical foundation and is not rejected statistically by other data sets. We propose bryophyte monophyly as the currently best hypothesis.
L3 - 10.1093/molbev/msh203
JF - Molecular Biology and Evolution
VL - 21
IS - 10
SP - 1813
EP - 1819
ER -