@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref19515,
author = {Ga?per Pustovrh and Simona Su?nik Bajec and Ale? Snoj},
title = {Evolutionary relationship between marble trout of the northern and the southern Adriatic basin},
year = {2011},
keywords = {Salmo marmoratus, S. trutta, multilocus phylogeny, nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Marble trout (Salmo marmoratus) populate two geographically separated areas in the northern and southern parts of the Adriatic Sea drainage. Although morphologically similar, each population is distinguished by a different set of unrelated mitochondrial haplotypes, suggesting that they have evolved from different ancestors. Due to a possible discordance between mitochondrial and species phylogeny, we performed phylogenetic analysis based on 22 nuclear loci. The results inferred from Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian Inference analysis revealed that northern and southern populations are closely related, forming a monophyletic group. This observation is concordant with the present marble trout classification, which considers both populations as conspecific. On the other hand, our findings are in marked contrast to those of previous mtDNA-based studies and highlight potential dangers of making phylogenetic inferences from mtDNA alone. Reasons for discordance between mtDNA and nDNA phylogeny are discussed with incomplete lineage sorting proposed as the most parsimonious explanation for mtDNA divergence in marble trout.}
}
Citation for Study 11264
Citation title:
"Evolutionary relationship between marble trout of the northern and the southern Adriatic basin".
Study name:
"Evolutionary relationship between marble trout of the northern and the southern Adriatic basin".
This study is part of submission 11254
(Status: Published).
Citation
Pustovrh G., Su?nik bajec S., & Snoj A. 2011. Evolutionary relationship between marble trout of the northern and the southern Adriatic basin. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, .
Authors
-
Pustovrh G.
-
Su?nik bajec S.
-
Snoj A.
Abstract
Marble trout (Salmo marmoratus) populate two geographically separated areas in the northern and southern parts of the Adriatic Sea drainage. Although morphologically similar, each population is distinguished by a different set of unrelated mitochondrial haplotypes, suggesting that they have evolved from different ancestors. Due to a possible discordance between mitochondrial and species phylogeny, we performed phylogenetic analysis based on 22 nuclear loci. The results inferred from Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian Inference analysis revealed that northern and southern populations are closely related, forming a monophyletic group. This observation is concordant with the present marble trout classification, which considers both populations as conspecific. On the other hand, our findings are in marked contrast to those of previous mtDNA-based studies and highlight potential dangers of making phylogenetic inferences from mtDNA alone. Reasons for discordance between mtDNA and nDNA phylogeny are discussed with incomplete lineage sorting proposed as the most parsimonious explanation for mtDNA divergence in marble trout.
Keywords
Salmo marmoratus, S. trutta, multilocus phylogeny, nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S11264
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref19515,
author = {Ga?per Pustovrh and Simona Su?nik Bajec and Ale? Snoj},
title = {Evolutionary relationship between marble trout of the northern and the southern Adriatic basin},
year = {2011},
keywords = {Salmo marmoratus, S. trutta, multilocus phylogeny, nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Marble trout (Salmo marmoratus) populate two geographically separated areas in the northern and southern parts of the Adriatic Sea drainage. Although morphologically similar, each population is distinguished by a different set of unrelated mitochondrial haplotypes, suggesting that they have evolved from different ancestors. Due to a possible discordance between mitochondrial and species phylogeny, we performed phylogenetic analysis based on 22 nuclear loci. The results inferred from Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian Inference analysis revealed that northern and southern populations are closely related, forming a monophyletic group. This observation is concordant with the present marble trout classification, which considers both populations as conspecific. On the other hand, our findings are in marked contrast to those of previous mtDNA-based studies and highlight potential dangers of making phylogenetic inferences from mtDNA alone. Reasons for discordance between mtDNA and nDNA phylogeny are discussed with incomplete lineage sorting proposed as the most parsimonious explanation for mtDNA divergence in marble trout.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 19515
AU - Pustovrh,Ga?per
AU - Su?nik Bajec,Simona
AU - Snoj,Ale?
T1 - Evolutionary relationship between marble trout of the northern and the southern Adriatic basin
PY - 2011
KW - Salmo marmoratus
KW - S. trutta
KW - multilocus phylogeny
KW - nuclear DNA
KW - mitochondrial DNA
UR - http://dx.doi.org/
N2 - Marble trout (Salmo marmoratus) populate two geographically separated areas in the northern and southern parts of the Adriatic Sea drainage. Although morphologically similar, each population is distinguished by a different set of unrelated mitochondrial haplotypes, suggesting that they have evolved from different ancestors. Due to a possible discordance between mitochondrial and species phylogeny, we performed phylogenetic analysis based on 22 nuclear loci. The results inferred from Maximum-likelihood and Bayesian Inference analysis revealed that northern and southern populations are closely related, forming a monophyletic group. This observation is concordant with the present marble trout classification, which considers both populations as conspecific. On the other hand, our findings are in marked contrast to those of previous mtDNA-based studies and highlight potential dangers of making phylogenetic inferences from mtDNA alone. Reasons for discordance between mtDNA and nDNA phylogeny are discussed with incomplete lineage sorting proposed as the most parsimonious explanation for mtDNA divergence in marble trout.
L3 -
JF - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
VL -
IS -
ER -
Go to search
Citation
Taxa
Matrices
Trees
Analyses
