@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref20736,
author = {Domingos Ben?cio Oliveira Silva Cardoso and Luciano Paganucci Queiroz and Haroldo Cavalcante de Lima and Elisa Suganuma and Cassio van den Berg and Matthew T. Lavin},
title = {A molecular phylogeny of the Vataireoid legumes underscores floral evolvability that is general to many early-branching papilionoid lineages},
year = {2013},
keywords = {convergence; floral evolution; Leguminosae; morphology; phylogeny; Papilionoideae},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {American Journal of Botany},
volume = {100},
number = {2},
pages = {403?421},
abstract = {Premise of study: The fused and completely differentiated papilionate floral organs in the neotropical legume trees Vatairea and Vataireopsis were traditionally used in part to ascribe these genera to the tribe Dalbergieae. In contrast, the free and mostly undifferentiated floral parts of Luetzelburgia and Sweetia fit the circumscription of the ?primitive? Sophoreae. Such divergent floral morphologies thought to divide deep phylogenetic lineages indeed may be prone to episodic transformation among close papilionoid relatives.
Methods: Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses involved nuclear ribosomal ITS/5.8S and six plastid (matK, 3'-trnK, psbA-trnH, trnL intron, rps16, and trnD-T) DNA sequence loci. We sampled 26 out of 27 known species of Luetzelburgia, Sweetia, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis for at least five loci, most represented by multiple conspecific accessions. Outgroups included the Lecointeoid legumes. Parsimony mapping of 30 morphological traits was performed to apomorphically diagnose each genus. Papilionate floral morphology was used in an ancestral state likelihood reconstruction at each node of the Vataireoid clade.
Key Results: Analysis of individual and combined data sets strongly resolved the monophyly of each of Luetzelburgia, Sweetia, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis. Vataireopsis was resolved as sister to the rest and the morphologically divergent Luetzelburgia and Vatairea were strongly resolved as sister clades. Floral morphology was generally not a good predictor of phylogenetic relatedness.
Conclusions: For the first time, Luetzelburgia, Sweetia, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis are unequivocally resolved as the ?Vataireoid? clade. Fruit and vegetative traits are found to be more phylogenetically conserved than many floral traits. This explains why the identity of the Vataireoids has been overlooked or confused. The evolvability of floral traits may also be a general condition among many of the early-branching papilionoid lineages.}
}
Citation for Study 12754

Citation title:
"A molecular phylogeny of the Vataireoid legumes underscores floral evolvability that is general to many early-branching papilionoid lineages".

Study name:
"A molecular phylogeny of the Vataireoid legumes underscores floral evolvability that is general to many early-branching papilionoid lineages".

This study is part of submission 12754
(Status: Published).
Citation
Cardoso D.B., Queiroz L.P., Cavalcante de lima H., Suganuma E., Van den berg C., & Lavin M. 2013. A molecular phylogeny of the Vataireoid legumes underscores floral evolvability that is general to many early-branching papilionoid lineages. American Journal of Botany, 100(2): 403?421.
Authors
-
Cardoso D.B.
-
Queiroz L.P.
-
Cavalcante de lima H.
-
Suganuma E.
-
Van den berg C.
+557534816761
-
Lavin M.
Abstract
Premise of study: The fused and completely differentiated papilionate floral organs in the neotropical legume trees Vatairea and Vataireopsis were traditionally used in part to ascribe these genera to the tribe Dalbergieae. In contrast, the free and mostly undifferentiated floral parts of Luetzelburgia and Sweetia fit the circumscription of the ?primitive? Sophoreae. Such divergent floral morphologies thought to divide deep phylogenetic lineages indeed may be prone to episodic transformation among close papilionoid relatives.
Methods: Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses involved nuclear ribosomal ITS/5.8S and six plastid (matK, 3'-trnK, psbA-trnH, trnL intron, rps16, and trnD-T) DNA sequence loci. We sampled 26 out of 27 known species of Luetzelburgia, Sweetia, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis for at least five loci, most represented by multiple conspecific accessions. Outgroups included the Lecointeoid legumes. Parsimony mapping of 30 morphological traits was performed to apomorphically diagnose each genus. Papilionate floral morphology was used in an ancestral state likelihood reconstruction at each node of the Vataireoid clade.
Key Results: Analysis of individual and combined data sets strongly resolved the monophyly of each of Luetzelburgia, Sweetia, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis. Vataireopsis was resolved as sister to the rest and the morphologically divergent Luetzelburgia and Vatairea were strongly resolved as sister clades. Floral morphology was generally not a good predictor of phylogenetic relatedness.
Conclusions: For the first time, Luetzelburgia, Sweetia, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis are unequivocally resolved as the ?Vataireoid? clade. Fruit and vegetative traits are found to be more phylogenetically conserved than many floral traits. This explains why the identity of the Vataireoids has been overlooked or confused. The evolvability of floral traits may also be a general condition among many of the early-branching papilionoid lineages.
Keywords
convergence; floral evolution; Leguminosae; morphology; phylogeny; Papilionoideae
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S12754
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref20736,
author = {Domingos Ben?cio Oliveira Silva Cardoso and Luciano Paganucci Queiroz and Haroldo Cavalcante de Lima and Elisa Suganuma and Cassio van den Berg and Matthew T. Lavin},
title = {A molecular phylogeny of the Vataireoid legumes underscores floral evolvability that is general to many early-branching papilionoid lineages},
year = {2013},
keywords = {convergence; floral evolution; Leguminosae; morphology; phylogeny; Papilionoideae},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {American Journal of Botany},
volume = {100},
number = {2},
pages = {403?421},
abstract = {Premise of study: The fused and completely differentiated papilionate floral organs in the neotropical legume trees Vatairea and Vataireopsis were traditionally used in part to ascribe these genera to the tribe Dalbergieae. In contrast, the free and mostly undifferentiated floral parts of Luetzelburgia and Sweetia fit the circumscription of the ?primitive? Sophoreae. Such divergent floral morphologies thought to divide deep phylogenetic lineages indeed may be prone to episodic transformation among close papilionoid relatives.
Methods: Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses involved nuclear ribosomal ITS/5.8S and six plastid (matK, 3'-trnK, psbA-trnH, trnL intron, rps16, and trnD-T) DNA sequence loci. We sampled 26 out of 27 known species of Luetzelburgia, Sweetia, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis for at least five loci, most represented by multiple conspecific accessions. Outgroups included the Lecointeoid legumes. Parsimony mapping of 30 morphological traits was performed to apomorphically diagnose each genus. Papilionate floral morphology was used in an ancestral state likelihood reconstruction at each node of the Vataireoid clade.
Key Results: Analysis of individual and combined data sets strongly resolved the monophyly of each of Luetzelburgia, Sweetia, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis. Vataireopsis was resolved as sister to the rest and the morphologically divergent Luetzelburgia and Vatairea were strongly resolved as sister clades. Floral morphology was generally not a good predictor of phylogenetic relatedness.
Conclusions: For the first time, Luetzelburgia, Sweetia, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis are unequivocally resolved as the ?Vataireoid? clade. Fruit and vegetative traits are found to be more phylogenetically conserved than many floral traits. This explains why the identity of the Vataireoids has been overlooked or confused. The evolvability of floral traits may also be a general condition among many of the early-branching papilionoid lineages.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 20736
AU - Cardoso,Domingos Ben?cio Oliveira Silva
AU - Queiroz,Luciano Paganucci
AU - Cavalcante de Lima,Haroldo
AU - Suganuma,Elisa
AU - van den Berg,Cassio
AU - Lavin,Matthew T.
T1 - A molecular phylogeny of the Vataireoid legumes underscores floral evolvability that is general to many early-branching papilionoid lineages
PY - 2013
KW - convergence; floral evolution; Leguminosae; morphology; phylogeny; Papilionoideae
UR - http://dx.doi.org/
N2 - Premise of study: The fused and completely differentiated papilionate floral organs in the neotropical legume trees Vatairea and Vataireopsis were traditionally used in part to ascribe these genera to the tribe Dalbergieae. In contrast, the free and mostly undifferentiated floral parts of Luetzelburgia and Sweetia fit the circumscription of the ?primitive? Sophoreae. Such divergent floral morphologies thought to divide deep phylogenetic lineages indeed may be prone to episodic transformation among close papilionoid relatives.
Methods: Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses involved nuclear ribosomal ITS/5.8S and six plastid (matK, 3'-trnK, psbA-trnH, trnL intron, rps16, and trnD-T) DNA sequence loci. We sampled 26 out of 27 known species of Luetzelburgia, Sweetia, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis for at least five loci, most represented by multiple conspecific accessions. Outgroups included the Lecointeoid legumes. Parsimony mapping of 30 morphological traits was performed to apomorphically diagnose each genus. Papilionate floral morphology was used in an ancestral state likelihood reconstruction at each node of the Vataireoid clade.
Key Results: Analysis of individual and combined data sets strongly resolved the monophyly of each of Luetzelburgia, Sweetia, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis. Vataireopsis was resolved as sister to the rest and the morphologically divergent Luetzelburgia and Vatairea were strongly resolved as sister clades. Floral morphology was generally not a good predictor of phylogenetic relatedness.
Conclusions: For the first time, Luetzelburgia, Sweetia, Vatairea, and Vataireopsis are unequivocally resolved as the ?Vataireoid? clade. Fruit and vegetative traits are found to be more phylogenetically conserved than many floral traits. This explains why the identity of the Vataireoids has been overlooked or confused. The evolvability of floral traits may also be a general condition among many of the early-branching papilionoid lineages.
L3 -
JF - American Journal of Botany
VL - 100
IS - 2
ER -