@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref19174, author = {Joshua R. McDill and Beryl B. Simpson}, title = {Molecular phylogeny of Linaceae with complete generic sampling and data from two chloroplast genes..}, year = {2010}, keywords = {Hugoniaceae Malpighiales - matK - molecular dating - molecular phylogenetics - rbcL }, doi = {}, url = {http://}, pmid = {}, journal = {Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society}, volume = {}, number = {}, pages = {}, abstract = {The phylogeny of Linaceae is examined, with sampling from the 13 commonly-recognized genera of the family and sequence data from the chloroplast genes matK and rbcL. Representatives of 24 additional families of the order Malpighiales are included in analyses, with members of Celastrales, Fabales, Fagales, Oxalidales, and Rosales used as outgroups. The Linaceae and both of its subfamilies, the temperate Linoideae and the tropical Hugonioideae, are found to be monophyletic in likelihood and parsimony-based analyses, although the monophyly of Hugonioideae is not well-supported. Average divergence time estimates using rbcL indicate that the subfamilies diverged from each other during the Paleocene, approximately 60 million years ago. No sister-group to Linaceae is consistently identified in these analyses, but relationships among families of Malpighiales are not well resolved. In accord with previous estimates of Linoideae phylogeny, Linum in shown to be non-monophyletic,with several segregate genera nested within it, but the relationships of the southeast Asian genera, Anisadenia, Reinwardtia, and Tirpitzia, remain uncertain. In Hugonioideae, Indorouchera and Philbornea are found to be closely related to members of Hugonia section Durandea. Relationships of the neotropical genera Hebepetalum and Roucheria to the paleotropical Hugonioids are not consistently resolved.} }

• Go to search
• Citation
• Taxa
• Matrices
• Trees
• Analyses
• 

CiteULike

Delicious

Connotea