@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref16984,
author = {Niklas Pedersen and C. J. Cox and L. Hedens},
title = {Phylogeny of the moss family Bryaceae inferred from chloroplast DNA sequences and morphology.},
year = {2003},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Systematic Botany},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Phylogenetic relationships within the moss family Bryaceae were studied using chloroplast DNA sequences (atpB-rbcL, rpl16, rps4, and trnL-trnF region) and anatomical and morphological data. Phylogenetic analyses using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian methods indicate that the genera Brachymenium, Bryum, and Rhodobryum are not monophyletic. A clade including Acidodontium, Anomobryum, Brachymenium acuminatum, Bryum species, Haplodontium, Mielichhoferia himalayana, and Plagiobryum is robustly supported in all analyses. The sections Brachymenium, Globosa, and Leptostomopsis of Brachymenium occur in a basal grade also including Bryum billarderi and Rhodobryum. The total evidence analysis supports Acidodontium as a monophyletic genus, whereas the maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses suggest a polyphyletic Acidodontium. Features of the reduced peristome are homoplastic within the Bryaceae, and it is obvious that circumscriptions of taxa based on sporophytic characters alone may unite taxa that are distantly related. The rosulate growth condition is homoplastic within the family, which suggests that the genus Rosulabryum is not monophyletic. Based on present phylogenetic evidence, no morphological synapomorphies can be detected for the Bryaceae.}
}
Taxa for matrix 529 of Study 985
Citation title:
"Phylogeny of the moss family Bryaceae inferred from chloroplast DNA sequences and morphology.".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S871
(Status: Published).
Taxa
Return to matrix row view
Citation
Taxa
Matrices
Trees
Analyses
