@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref15794, author = {Martin Helmkampf and Iris Bruchhaus and Bernhard Hausdorf}, title = {Multigene analysis of lophophorate and chaetognath phylogenetic relationships}, year = {2008}, keywords = {}, doi = {10.1016/j.ympev.2007.09.004}, url = {}, pmid = {17937996}, journal = {Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution}, volume = {46}, number = {1}, pages = {206--214}, abstract = {Maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses of seven concatenated fragments of nuclear-encoded housekeeping genes indicate that Lophotrochozoa is monophyletic, i.e., the lophophorate groups Bryozoa, Brachiopoda and Phoronida are more closely related to molluscs and annelids than to Deuterostomia or Ecdysozoa. Lophophorates themselves, however, form a polyphyletic assemblage. The hypotheses that they are monophyletic and more closely allied to Deuterostomia than to Protostomia can be ruled out with both the approximately unbiased test and the expected likelihood weights test. The existence of Phoronozoa, a putative clade including Brachiopoda and Phoronida, has also been rejected. According to our analyses, phoronids instead share a more recent common ancestor with bryozoans than with brachiopods. Platyhelminthes is the sister group of Lophotrochozoa. Together these two constitute Spiralia. Although Chaetognatha appears as the sister group of Priapulida within Ecdysozoa in our analyses, alternative hypothesis concerning chaetognath relationships could not be rejected.} }

• Go to search
• Citation
• Taxa
• Matrices
• Trees
• Analyses
• 

CiteULike

Delicious

Connotea