@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref16636,
author = {Marc A McPherson and M. F. Fay and Mark W. Chase and Sean W Graham},
title = {Parallel loss of a slowly evolving intron from two closely related families of Asparagales.},
year = {2003},
keywords = {},
doi = {10.1600/036364404774195494},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {Systematic Botany},
volume = {29},
number = {2},
pages = {296--307},
abstract = {Convergent intron loss in the plastid genome has been reported at a broad phylogenetic level in the flowering plants, but no cases are known among closely related taxa, aside from those with a propensity for genome rearrangement. We performed a large survey of a plastid intron in the 3'-rps12 locus and found that it is present in all monocots sampled, apart from two closely related families, Asphodelaceae and Hemerocallidaceae, in the order Asparagales. However, only a subset of taxa in the latter family lack it. A likelihood-based parametric bootstrapping analysis rejects an hypothesis that intron loss is a marker for the monophyly of all the taxa lacking it. Reconstructions of evolutionary transformation in intron status (presence vs. absence) using an equal weighting scheme (standard parsimony) on optimal and plausible suboptimal trees instead yield two major classes of ancestral-state assignment. These scenarios indicate that introns were either lost in parallel, or there was a single loss and a subsequent secondary origin. Parsimony weighting schemes that are skewed but (arguably) more realistic than equal weighting reject the latter reconstruction and support an hypothesis that intron loss is not homologous in Asphodelaceae and Hemerocallidaceae. One of the parallel losses supports a recent circumscription of Hemerocallidaceae to incorporate the family Johnsoniaceae.}
}
Analyses for Study 1015
Citation title: "Parallel loss of a slowly evolving intron from two closely related families of Asparagales.".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S906
(Status: Published).