@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref20027,
author = {Rolando T. Barcenas and C Yesson and Julie A Hawkins},
title = {Molecular Systematics of the Cactaceae},
year = {2011},
keywords = {matK phylogeny Bayesian Parsimony Likelihood },
doi = {10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00350.x},
url = {http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2011.00350.x/abstract},
pmid = {},
journal = {Cladistics},
volume = {27},
number = {},
pages = {1--20},
abstract = {Bayesian, maximum-likelihood, and maximum-parsimony phylogenies, constructed using nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene region trnK-matK, are employed to investigate relationships within the Cactaceae. These phylogenies sample 666 plants
representing 532 of the 1438 species recognized in the family. All four subfamilies, all nine tribes, and 69% of currently recognized genera of Cactaceae are sampled. We found strong support for three of the four currently recognized subfamilies, although relationships between subfamilies were not well defined. Major clades recovered within the largest subfamilies, Opuntioideae and
Cactoideae, are reviewed; only three of the nine currently accepted tribes delimited within these subfamilies, the Cacteae, Rhipsalideae,
and Opuntieae, are monophyletic, although the Opuntieae were recovered in only the Bayesian and maximum-likelihood analyses, not
in the maximum-parsimony analysis, and more data are needed to reveal the status of the Cylindropuntieae, which may yet be monophyletic. Of the 42 genera with more than one exemplar in our study, only 17 were monophyletic; 14 of these genera were from subfamily Cactoideae and three from subfamily Opuntioideae. We present a synopsis of the status of the currently recognized genera.}
}
Matrices for Study 11902
Citation title:
"Molecular Systematics of the Cactaceae".
Study name:
"Molecular Systematics of the Cactaceae".
This study is part of submission 11902
(Status: Published).
Matrices
Go to search
Citation
Taxa
Matrices
Trees
Analyses
