@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref16080,
author = {Elizabeth A. Kellogg},
title = {Comments on genomic genera in the Triticeae (Poaceae).},
year = {1989},
keywords = {},
doi = {},
url = {},
pmid = {},
journal = {American Journal of Botany},
volume = {76},
number = {},
pages = {796--805},
abstract = {Generic delimitation in the Triticeae has long been problematical because the extensive hybridization in the group is not readily accomodated in a hierarchical classification. The genomic genera of Love (1984) are one solution, but fully one-third of them are polyphyletic, incorporating 2 or more genomes. The suggestion that the tribe be considered a single genus (Stebbins, 1956) is theoretically defensiblethe genus would be strictly monophyleticbut probably impractical. This paper presents a cladistic analysis of the tribe that differs from previous analyses in that it uses only strictly monophyletic (monogenomic) groups as terminal taxa; hybrids (heterogenomic groups) are shown as reticulations. Monophyletic groups can then be delimited to minimize the number of polyphyletic genera. A classification incorporating genomic information is derived from the phylogeny.}
}
Matrices for Study 166
Citation title:
"Comments on genomic genera in the Triticeae (Poaceae).".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S2x2x96c16c32c09
(Status: Published).
Matrices
Go to search
Citation
Taxa
Matrices
Trees
Analyses
