TreeBASE Search-Matrices for study 21792

@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref27791, author = {Felix Forest and Justin Moat and Elisabeth Baloch and Neil A Brummitt and Steve Bachman and Stefanie M. Ickert-Bond and Peter M. Hollingsworth and Aaron Liston and Damon P. Little and Sarah Mathews and hardeep rai and Catarina Rydin and Dennis W. Stevenson and Philip Thomas and Sven Buerki}, title = {Gymnosperms on the EDGE}, year = {2017}, keywords = {Conservation, extinction probability, gymnosperms, phylogenetics}, doi = {}, url = {http://}, pmid = {}, journal = {Scientific Reports}, volume = {}, number = {}, pages = {}, abstract = {Driven by limited resources and a sense of urgency, the prioritization of species for conservation has been a persistent concern in conservation science. Gymnosperms (comprising ginkgo, conifers, cycads, and gnetophytes) are one of the most threatened groups of living organisms, with 40% of the species at high risk of extinction, about twice as many as the most recent estimates for all plants (i.e. 21.4%). This high proportion of species facing extinction highlights the urgent action require to secure their future through an objective prioritization approach. The Evolutionary Distinct and Globally Endangered (EDGE) method rapidly rank species based on their evolutionary distinctiveness and the extinction risks they face. EDGE is applied to gymnosperms using a phylogenetic tree comprising DNA sequence data for 85% of gymnosperm species (923 out of 1090 species) and IUCN Red List assessments available for 92% of species. The effect of different extinction probability transformations and the handling of IUCN data deficient species on the resulting rankings is investigated. Although top entries in our ranking comprise species that were expected to score well (e.g. Wollemia nobilis, Ginkgo biloba), many were unexpected (e.g. Araucaria araucana). These results highlight the necessity of using approaches that integrate evolutionary information in conservation science. } }