@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref20465,
author = {Carmelo And?jar and Jos? Serrano and Jes?s G?mez-Zurita},
title = {Winding up the molecular clock in the genus Carabus (Coleoptera: Carabidae): assessment of methodological decisions on rate and node age estimation.},
year = {2012},
keywords = {Molecular clock, rates of molecular evolution, deep node ages, partitioning model, clock model, outgroup selection, Gblocks, mitochondrial genes, nuclear genes, Coleoptera, Carabus.},
doi = {10.1186/1471-2148-12-40},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {BMC Evolutionary Biology},
volume = {12},
number = {},
pages = {40},
abstract = {Background: Rates of molecular evolution are known to vary across taxa and among genes, and this requires rate calibration for each specific dataset based on external information. Calibration is sensitive to evolutionary model parameters, partitioning schemes and clock model. However, the way in which these and other analytical aspects affect both the rates and the resulting clade ages from calibrated phylogenies are not yet well understood. To investigate these aspects we have conducted calibration analyses for the genus Carabus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) on five mitochondrial and four nuclear DNA fragments with 7888 nt total length, testing different clock models and partitioning schemes to select the most suitable using Bayes Factors comparisons.
Results: Results support an origin of the genus Carabus during the Oligocene in the Eurasian continent followed by a Miocene differentiation that originated all main extant lineages. We used these data to investigate the effect of ambiguous character and outgroup inclusion on both rates of molecular evolution and TMRCA of Carabus. We found a considerable variation in rates of molecular evolution depending on the fragment studied (ranging from 5.02% in cob to 0.26% divergence/My in LSU-A), but also on analytical conditions. Alternative choices of clock model, partitioning scheme, treatment of ambiguous characters, and outgroup inclusion resulted in rate increments ranging from 28% (HUWE1) to 1000% (LSU-b and ITS2) and increments in the TMRCA of Carabus ranging from 8.4% (cox1-a) to 540% (ITS2).
Conclusions: The combination of several genes is found the best strategy to minimise both the idiosyncratic behaviors of individual markers and the effect of analytical aspects in rate and age estimations. Our results highlight the importance of estimating rates of molecular evolution for each specific dataset, selecting for optimal clock and partitioning models as well as other methodological issues potentially affecting rate estimation.
}
}
Matrix 11711 of Study 12410

Citation title:
"Winding up the molecular clock in the genus Carabus (Coleoptera: Carabidae): assessment of methodological decisions on rate and node age estimation.".

Study name:
"Winding up the molecular clock in the genus Carabus (Coleoptera: Carabidae): assessment of methodological decisions on rate and node age estimation.".

This study is part of submission 12410
(Status: Published).
Matrices
Title: MIT NUC all AllGaps Bygene
Description: Outgroup dataset, Concatenation of all genes, cob. cox1-a, cox1b, nd5, rrnL, LSU-a, LSU-b, ITS2 and HUWE1
Rows
|
Taxon Label |
Row Segments |
Characters 1?–30 |
| Laemostenus terricola TEUL4309 |
(none)
|
TTATTTTTAGCTATACATTATACAGCTAAT |
| Cychrus semigranosus CYCH1003 |
(none)
|
TTATTTTTAGCAATACATTATACGGCTAAT |
| Carabus clathratus TURQ51901 |
(none)
|
TTATTTTTAGCCATACATTATACTGCTAAT |
| Carabus irregularis ROMA94006 |
(none)
|
CTATTTTTAGCTATACATTATACAGCTAAT |
| Carabus cancellatus ROMA94106 |
(none)
|
CTATTTCTAGCTATACATTATACTGCAAAT |
| Carabus cancellatus TACHcc816 |
(none)
|
CTATTTCTAGCTATACATTATACTGCAAAT |
| Carabus melancholicus EALM42207 |
(none)
|
TTATTCTTAGCTATACACTATACAGCAAAT |
| Carabus melancholicus ROBU37 |
(none)
|
TTATTCTTAGCTATACACTATACAGCAAAT |
| Carabus melancholicus TIDI39104 |
(none)
|
TTATTTTTAGCTATACACTATACAGCAAAT |
| Carabus lusitanicus VESC5 |
(none)
|
TTATTTTTAGCTATACACTATACTGCAAAT |
| Carabus dufouri ZUHE111 |
(none)
|
CTATTCTTAGCTATACATTATACCGCGAAC |
| Carabus macrocephalus FORO157 |
(none)
|
TTATTTTTAGCTATGCACTATACAGCAAAC |
| Carabus riffensis KETA569 |
(none)
|
TTATTTTTAGCCATACATTACACAGCAAAT |
| Carabus famini EURY1625 |
(none)
|
CTATTTTTAGCTATACATTATACTGCAAAT |
| Carabus famini MORR54807 |
(none)
|
CTCTTCTTAGCTATACATTACACTGCAAAT |
| Carabus abbreviatus TENE15007 |
(none)
|
TTATTTTTAGCGATACATTACACTGCAAAT |
| Carabus abbreviatus BABA44 |
(none)
|
???????????????CCTTACACTGCAAAT |
| Carabus violaceus POPO83000 |
(none)
|
CTATTTTTAGCTATACACTTTACTGCTGAT |
| Carabus monilis SAOU1538 |
(none)
|
CTATTTCTAGCTATACATTATACCGCTAAT |
| Carabus coriaceus TURQ91306 |
(none)
|
TTATTTCTAGCTATACATTATACTGCTAAT |
| Carabus rutilans SENY1548 |
(none)
|
TTATTCTTAGCTATACACTATACTGCAGAT |
| Carabus auronitens ROMA93906 |
(none)
|
TTATTCCTAGCTATACACTATACTGCAAAT |
| Carabus rugosus SMAR43907 |
(none)
|
CTATTCCTAGCTATACACTATACAGCAAAT |
| Carabus rugosus KSAR65807 |
(none)
|
CTATTTCTAGCTATACATTACACAGCAAAT |
| Carabus morbillosus MAZA5908 |
(none)
|
TTATTCCTAGCTATACATTACACAGCAAAT |
| Carabus morbillosus TUNA1622 |
(none)
|
TTATTTCTAGCTATACATTATACAGCAAAT |
| Carabus morbillosus TUNC1624 |
(none)
|
TTATTTCTAGCTATACATTATACAGCAAAT |
| Carabus morbillosus TUNB1623 |
(none)
|
TTATTTCTAGCTATACATTATACAGCAAAT |
| Carabus nemoralis RONC1549 |
(none)
|
TTATTCCTAGCCATACATTATACAGCAAAT |
| Carabus deyrollei GALI1553 |
(none)
|
TTATTTTTAGCTATACATTATACTGCTAAT |
| Calosoma sycophanta CALO25405 |
(none)
|
CTATTTTTAGCTATACATTATACTGCTAAT |
| Calosoma auropunctatum TURQ52001 |
(none)
|
TTATTTTTAGCTATACATTATACTGCTAAT |
| Ceroglossus chilensis CHIL1GA |
(none)
|
CTATTTTTAGCTATACATTATACAGCCAGA |
| Leistus spinibarbis CMOJ3909 |
(none)
|
TTATTTCTTGCTATACATTACACAGCTAAT |
Columns
None of the columns has a description.