@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref22138,
author = {Paola Fory and Lindsay R Triplett and Carolina Ballen and J Abello and Jorge duitama and Maria Aricapa and Gustavo Prado and Fernando Correa and John Hamilton and jan leach and Joseph Tohme and Gloria Mosquera},
title = {Comparative analysis of two emerging rice seed pathogens},
year = {2013},
keywords = {Burkholderia glumae, Burkholderia gladioli, bacterial panicle blight},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {Phytopathology},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Seed sterility and grain discoloration limit rice production in Colombia and several Central American countries. In samples of discolored rice seed grown in Colombian fields, two rice pathogenic bacterial species were isolated; Burkholderia glumae and B. gladioli, and several of the field isolates were compared phenotypically. An artificial inoculation assay was developed and used to determine that while both bacterial species can colonize and cause symptoms on rice grains, B. glumae causes higher levels of grain sterility than B. gladioli isolates. B. glumae reduced rice yield up to 75%, while B. gladioli did not affect yield. Therefore, while the two species are closely related and inhabit a similar niche, B. glumae is the more aggressive and damaging pathogen of rice. To identify potential sources of virulence differences between B. glumae and B. gladioli, four previously sequenced genomes of Asian and US strains of B. glumae and B. gladioli were compared with each other and with two draft genomes of Colombian B. glumae and B. gladioli isolates generated for this study. While characterized Burkholderia virulence factors involved in toxin and lipase production and quorum sensing are highly conserved between the two species, B. glumae and B. gladioli strains are predicted to encode distinct complements of type VI secretion systems, transcriptional regulators, membrane sensing proteins, and type III secreted effectors. These findings show that both B. glumae and B. gladioli can threaten grain quality although only one species affects yield, and identifies differences in the core genetic makeup of the species that could contribute to the phenotypic differences between them. }
}
Matrix 11906 of Study 14408
Citation title:
"Comparative analysis of two emerging rice seed pathogens".
Study name:
"Comparative analysis of two emerging rice seed pathogens".
This study is part of submission 14408
(Status: Published).
Matrices
Title: Elsiella Morphology
Rows
|
Taxon Label |
Row Segments |
Characters 1?–30 |
| Tibilis |
(none)
|
010000000000000010000000010000 |
| Neotibilis |
(none)
|
000000001000000000000000000000 |
| Similliserdia |
(none)
|
001001000001000001000020001000 |
| Serdia concolor |
(none)
|
001001000011000000101110001000 |
| Serdia indistincta |
(none)
|
001001000011000000101110001000 |
| Serdia beckerae |
(none)
|
011001000011000001011020111111 |
| Serdia quadridens |
(none)
|
011001100011000011011020111111 |
| Serdia delphis |
(none)
|
011001000001000011011020111111 |
| Serdia ruckesi |
(none)
|
011001000001000011011000111111 |
| Serdia bihamulata |
(none)
|
011011000011000000001120211101 |
| Serdia rotundicornis |
(none)
|
011011010011000010001001211101 |
| Serdia limbatipennis |
(none)
|
011011000011010010011101211101 |
| Serdia bicolor |
(none)
|
011101100011010010011001211101 |
| Serdia inspersipes |
(none)
|
011001100111010000011001211100 |
| Serdia robusta |
(none)
|
0110011001110100000110012????? |
| Serdia apicicornis |
(none)
|
011001110111110110001001011101 |
| Serdia maxima |
(none)
|
011001110111110110011001211101 |
| Serdia lobata |
(none)
|
011111110111010010001001211101 |
| Serdia costalis |
(none)
|
1011110011110010100110013????? |
| Serdia calligera |
(none)
|
101111001111001000111001311101 |
| Serdia maculata |
(none)
|
101111001111001010111001311101 |
| Elsiella plana |
(none)
|
010000000001010?100001201????? |
Columns
| Column |
Character Description |
|
1
|
Head before eyes
|
|
2
|
Apex of juga before clypeus
|
|
3
|
Second antennal segment
|
|
4
|
Longitudinal dorsal sulcus of the third antennal segment
|
|
5
|
Fourth antennal segment
|
|
6
|
First segment of rostrum
|
|
7
|
Anterolateral margins of pronotum
|
|
8
|
Humeral angles
|
|
9
|
Callus behind the fovea of scutellar basal angles
|
|
10
|
Margins of scutellar apex
|
|
11
|
Scutellar apex
|
|
12
|
Peritreme
|
|
13
|
Black spots on connexival segments
|
|
14
|
Median spine on third abdominal segment
|
|
15
|
Ventral abdominal calloused maculae
|
|
16
|
Black spots on median seventh urosternites in male
|
|
17
|
Body shape
|
|
18
|
Bristles on ventral wall near to posterolateral angles of pygophore
|
|
19
|
Apical processes of dorsal rim of pygophore
|
|
20
|
Median third processes of dorsal rim of pygophore
|
|
21
|
Superior processes of dorsal rim of pygophore
|
|
22
|
Ventral rim of pygophore
|
|
23
|
Superior ridge of ventral rim of pygophore
|
|
24
|
Dorsal rim of pygophore
|
|
25
|
Parameres
|
|
26
|
Lateral expansions of phallotheca
|
|
27
|
Opening of phallotheca
|
|
28
|
Vesica
|
|
29
|
Vesica processes
|
|
30
|
Ductus seminis distalis opening
|
|
31
|
Posterior margins of laterotergites 8
|
|
32
|
Laterotergites 9
|
|
33
|
Apex of laterotergites 9
|
|
34
|
Maximum length of gonocoxites 8
|
|
35
|
Lateral angles of gonocoxites 8
|
|
36
|
Chitinellipsen placement in relation to the thickening of the vaginal intima
|
|
37
|
Thickening of the vaginal intima
|
|
38
|
Thickening of the vaginal intima
|
|
39
|
Pars intermedialis
|
|
40
|
Capsula seminalis
|
Go to search
Citation
Taxa
Matrices
Trees
Analyses
