@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref18637,
	 author = {Valqu?ria Rezende  Almeida and A. F.  Costa and Andr? Mantovani  Oliveira and V?nia Gon?alves Louren?o  Esteves and R. C. O.  Arruda and Rafaela Campostrini  Forzza},
	 title = {Morphological phylogenetics of Quesnelia (Bromeliaceae, Bromelioideae)},
	 year = {2009},
	 keywords = {},
	 doi = {10.1600/036364409790139619},
	 url = {},
	 pmid = {},
	 journal = {Systematic Botany},
	 volume = {34},
	 number = {4},
	 pages = {660--672},
	 abstract = {The genus Quesnelia presently includes 18 species, which occur mainly near the east coast of Brazil from the states of Rio de Janeiro to Bahia. The genus has been divided into two subgenera, Quesnelia and Billbergiopsis. However, its generic and subgeneric delimitation is artificial: in several classifications proposed in the family, different investigators have questioned the naturalness of the group, noting its affinity with species of Aechmea and Billbergia. With the objective of assessing the monophyly of the genus, and evaluating the subgeneric delimitation and the relationship of its species to other genera, a phylogenetic analysis was carried out, based on parsimony and using the program PAUP version 4.0. The analysis included 33 taxa, with 92 morphological characters. The genera Quesnelia and Aechmea emerged as polyphyletic, and Billbergia as monophyletic. In regard to the subgeneric classification, Quesnelia subgenus Quesnelia emerged as monophyletic, and Quesnelia subgenus Billbergiopsis as polyphyletic. The majority of the species of Quesnelia subgenus Billbergiopsis emerged as the sister group to Billbergia. Even when anatomical and palynological characters were included, the consistency index of the tree obtained was very low, indicating high levels of homoplasy in the group. In addition, the majority of the clades formed did not have good statistical support. Therefore, taxonomic changes are not proposed because these would be very premature.}
}
Citation for Study 10146
	
	
		
		Citation title: 
"Morphological phylogenetics of Quesnelia (Bromeliaceae, Bromelioideae)".
	
 
	
		
			
	
			This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S2489  
			(Status: Published).
		
 
	
	
 
Citation
	Almeida V., Costa A., Oliveira A., Esteves V., Arruda R., & Forzza R. 2009. Morphological phylogenetics of Quesnelia (Bromeliaceae, Bromelioideae). Systematic Botany, 34(4): 660-672.
	
		Authors
		
			
				- 
					Almeida V.
					
						
								
				
 
			
				- 
					Costa A.
					
						
								
				
 
			
				- 
					Oliveira A.
					
						
						
						
								
				
 
			
				- 
					Esteves V.
					
						
						
						
								
				
 
			
				- 
					Arruda R.
					
						
								
				
 
			
				- 
					Forzza R.
					
						
						
						
								
				
 
			
		
	
	Abstract
	The genus Quesnelia presently includes 18 species, which occur mainly near the east coast of Brazil from the states of Rio de Janeiro to Bahia. The genus has been divided into two subgenera, Quesnelia and Billbergiopsis. However, its generic and subgeneric delimitation is artificial: in several classifications proposed in the family, different investigators have questioned the naturalness of the group, noting its affinity with species of Aechmea and Billbergia. With the objective of assessing the monophyly of the genus, and evaluating the subgeneric delimitation and the relationship of its species to other genera, a phylogenetic analysis was carried out, based on parsimony and using the program PAUP version 4.0. The analysis included 33 taxa, with 92 morphological characters. The genera Quesnelia and Aechmea emerged as polyphyletic, and Billbergia as monophyletic. In regard to the subgeneric classification, Quesnelia subgenus Quesnelia emerged as monophyletic, and Quesnelia subgenus Billbergiopsis as polyphyletic. The majority of the species of Quesnelia subgenus Billbergiopsis emerged as the sister group to Billbergia. Even when anatomical and palynological characters were included, the consistency index of the tree obtained was very low, indicating high levels of homoplasy in the group. In addition, the majority of the clades formed did not have good statistical support. Therefore, taxonomic changes are not proposed because these would be very premature.
	External links
	
About this resource
	- Canonical resource URI: 
		
			
	
			http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S10146
		
	 
	- Other versions:
	
		
			
	
			Nexus			
		
		
			
	
			NeXML			
			
		
	 
	- Show BibTeX reference
		
		@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref18637,
	 author = {Valqu?ria Rezende  Almeida and A. F.  Costa and Andr? Mantovani  Oliveira and V?nia Gon?alves Louren?o  Esteves and R. C. O.  Arruda and Rafaela Campostrini  Forzza},
	 title = {Morphological phylogenetics of Quesnelia (Bromeliaceae, Bromelioideae)},
	 year = {2009},
	 keywords = {},
	 doi = {10.1600/036364409790139619},
	 url = {},
	 pmid = {},
	 journal = {Systematic Botany},
	 volume = {34},
	 number = {4},
	 pages = {660--672},
	 abstract = {The genus Quesnelia presently includes 18 species, which occur mainly near the east coast of Brazil from the states of Rio de Janeiro to Bahia. The genus has been divided into two subgenera, Quesnelia and Billbergiopsis. However, its generic and subgeneric delimitation is artificial: in several classifications proposed in the family, different investigators have questioned the naturalness of the group, noting its affinity with species of Aechmea and Billbergia. With the objective of assessing the monophyly of the genus, and evaluating the subgeneric delimitation and the relationship of its species to other genera, a phylogenetic analysis was carried out, based on parsimony and using the program PAUP version 4.0. The analysis included 33 taxa, with 92 morphological characters. The genera Quesnelia and Aechmea emerged as polyphyletic, and Billbergia as monophyletic. In regard to the subgeneric classification, Quesnelia subgenus Quesnelia emerged as monophyletic, and Quesnelia subgenus Billbergiopsis as polyphyletic. The majority of the species of Quesnelia subgenus Billbergiopsis emerged as the sister group to Billbergia. Even when anatomical and palynological characters were included, the consistency index of the tree obtained was very low, indicating high levels of homoplasy in the group. In addition, the majority of the clades formed did not have good statistical support. Therefore, taxonomic changes are not proposed because these would be very premature.}
}
		
	 
	
	- Show RIS reference
		
		TY  - JOUR
ID  - 18637
AU  - Almeida,Valqu?ria Rezende 
AU  - Costa,A. F. 
AU  - Oliveira,Andr? Mantovani 
AU  - Esteves,V?nia Gon?alves Louren?o 
AU  - Arruda,R. C. O. 
AU  - Forzza,Rafaela Campostrini 
T1  - Morphological phylogenetics of Quesnelia (Bromeliaceae, Bromelioideae)
PY  - 2009
KW  - 
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1600/036364409790139619
N2  - The genus Quesnelia presently includes 18 species, which occur mainly near the east coast of Brazil from the states of Rio de Janeiro to Bahia. The genus has been divided into two subgenera, Quesnelia and Billbergiopsis. However, its generic and subgeneric delimitation is artificial: in several classifications proposed in the family, different investigators have questioned the naturalness of the group, noting its affinity with species of Aechmea and Billbergia. With the objective of assessing the monophyly of the genus, and evaluating the subgeneric delimitation and the relationship of its species to other genera, a phylogenetic analysis was carried out, based on parsimony and using the program PAUP version 4.0. The analysis included 33 taxa, with 92 morphological characters. The genera Quesnelia and Aechmea emerged as polyphyletic, and Billbergia as monophyletic. In regard to the subgeneric classification, Quesnelia subgenus Quesnelia emerged as monophyletic, and Quesnelia subgenus Billbergiopsis as polyphyletic. The majority of the species of Quesnelia subgenus Billbergiopsis emerged as the sister group to Billbergia. Even when anatomical and palynological characters were included, the consistency index of the tree obtained was very low, indicating high levels of homoplasy in the group. In addition, the majority of the clades formed did not have good statistical support. Therefore, taxonomic changes are not proposed because these would be very premature.
L3  - 10.1600/036364409790139619
JF  - Systematic Botany
VL  - 34
IS  - 4
SP  - 660
EP  - 672
ER  -