@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref21406,
author = {Mark S. Springer and Robert William Meredith and John Gatesy and Christopher Allan Emerling and Jong Park and Daniel Rabosky and Tanja Stadler and Cynthia Steiner and Oliver A. Ryder and Jan Janecka and Colleen Fisher and William J. Murphy},
title = {Macroevolutionary Dynamics and Historical Biogeography of Primate Diversification Inferred from a Species Supermatrix},
year = {2012},
keywords = {primate phylogeny; timetree; historical biogeography; diversification analyses; Grande Coupure},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Phylogenetic relationships, divergence times, and patterns of biogeographic descent
among primate species are both complex and contentious. Here, we generate a robust
molecular phylogeny for 70 primate genera and 367 primate species based on a
concatenation of 69 nuclear gene segments and ten mitochondrial gene sequences.
Relaxed clock analyses of divergence times with 14 fossil-calibrated nodes suggest
that living Primates last shared a common ancestor 71-63 Ma, and that divergences
within both Strepsirrhini and Haplorhini are entirely post-Cretaceous. These results are
consistent with the hypothesis that the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction of nonavian
dinosaurs played an important role in the diversification of placental mammals.
Previous queries into primate historical biogeography have suggested Africa, Asia,
Europe, or North America as the ancestral area of crown primates, but were based on
methods that were coopted from phylogeny reconstruction. By contrast, we analyzed
our molecular phylogeny with two methods that were developed explicitly for ancestral
area reconstruction, and find support for the hypothesis that the most recent common
ancestor of living Primates resided in Asia. Analyses of primate macroevolutionary
dynamics provide support for a diversification rate increase in the late Miocene,
possibly in response to elevated global mean temperatures, and are consistent with
the fossil record. By contrast, diversification analyses failed to detect evidence for rateshift
changes near the Eocene-Oligocene boundary even though the fossil record
provides clear evidence for a major turnover event ("Grande Coupure") at this time.
Our results highlight the power and limitations of inferring diversification dynamics from
molecular phylogenies, as well as the sensitivity of diversification analyses to different
species concepts.}
}
Citation for Study 13451

Citation title:
"Macroevolutionary Dynamics and Historical Biogeography of Primate Diversification Inferred from a Species Supermatrix".

Study name:
"Macroevolutionary Dynamics and Historical Biogeography of Primate Diversification Inferred from a Species Supermatrix".

This study is part of submission 13451
(Status: Published).
Citation
Springer M., Meredith R.W., Gatesy J., Emerling C.A., Park J., Rabosky D., Stadler T., Steiner C., Ryder O.A., Janecka J., Fisher C., & Murphy W. 2012. Macroevolutionary Dynamics and Historical Biogeography of Primate Diversification Inferred from a Species Supermatrix. PLoS ONE, .
Authors
-
Springer M.
-
Meredith R.W.
951-347-6929
-
Gatesy J.
-
Emerling C.A.
(submitter)
-
Park J.
-
Rabosky D.
-
Stadler T.
-
Steiner C.
-
Ryder O.A.
-
Janecka J.
-
Fisher C.
-
Murphy W.
Abstract
Phylogenetic relationships, divergence times, and patterns of biogeographic descent
among primate species are both complex and contentious. Here, we generate a robust
molecular phylogeny for 70 primate genera and 367 primate species based on a
concatenation of 69 nuclear gene segments and ten mitochondrial gene sequences.
Relaxed clock analyses of divergence times with 14 fossil-calibrated nodes suggest
that living Primates last shared a common ancestor 71-63 Ma, and that divergences
within both Strepsirrhini and Haplorhini are entirely post-Cretaceous. These results are
consistent with the hypothesis that the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction of nonavian
dinosaurs played an important role in the diversification of placental mammals.
Previous queries into primate historical biogeography have suggested Africa, Asia,
Europe, or North America as the ancestral area of crown primates, but were based on
methods that were coopted from phylogeny reconstruction. By contrast, we analyzed
our molecular phylogeny with two methods that were developed explicitly for ancestral
area reconstruction, and find support for the hypothesis that the most recent common
ancestor of living Primates resided in Asia. Analyses of primate macroevolutionary
dynamics provide support for a diversification rate increase in the late Miocene,
possibly in response to elevated global mean temperatures, and are consistent with
the fossil record. By contrast, diversification analyses failed to detect evidence for rateshift
changes near the Eocene-Oligocene boundary even though the fossil record
provides clear evidence for a major turnover event ("Grande Coupure") at this time.
Our results highlight the power and limitations of inferring diversification dynamics from
molecular phylogenies, as well as the sensitivity of diversification analyses to different
species concepts.
Keywords
primate phylogeny; timetree; historical biogeography; diversification analyses; Grande Coupure
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S13451
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref21406,
author = {Mark S. Springer and Robert William Meredith and John Gatesy and Christopher Allan Emerling and Jong Park and Daniel Rabosky and Tanja Stadler and Cynthia Steiner and Oliver A. Ryder and Jan Janecka and Colleen Fisher and William J. Murphy},
title = {Macroevolutionary Dynamics and Historical Biogeography of Primate Diversification Inferred from a Species Supermatrix},
year = {2012},
keywords = {primate phylogeny; timetree; historical biogeography; diversification analyses; Grande Coupure},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {PLoS ONE},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Phylogenetic relationships, divergence times, and patterns of biogeographic descent
among primate species are both complex and contentious. Here, we generate a robust
molecular phylogeny for 70 primate genera and 367 primate species based on a
concatenation of 69 nuclear gene segments and ten mitochondrial gene sequences.
Relaxed clock analyses of divergence times with 14 fossil-calibrated nodes suggest
that living Primates last shared a common ancestor 71-63 Ma, and that divergences
within both Strepsirrhini and Haplorhini are entirely post-Cretaceous. These results are
consistent with the hypothesis that the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction of nonavian
dinosaurs played an important role in the diversification of placental mammals.
Previous queries into primate historical biogeography have suggested Africa, Asia,
Europe, or North America as the ancestral area of crown primates, but were based on
methods that were coopted from phylogeny reconstruction. By contrast, we analyzed
our molecular phylogeny with two methods that were developed explicitly for ancestral
area reconstruction, and find support for the hypothesis that the most recent common
ancestor of living Primates resided in Asia. Analyses of primate macroevolutionary
dynamics provide support for a diversification rate increase in the late Miocene,
possibly in response to elevated global mean temperatures, and are consistent with
the fossil record. By contrast, diversification analyses failed to detect evidence for rateshift
changes near the Eocene-Oligocene boundary even though the fossil record
provides clear evidence for a major turnover event ("Grande Coupure") at this time.
Our results highlight the power and limitations of inferring diversification dynamics from
molecular phylogenies, as well as the sensitivity of diversification analyses to different
species concepts.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 21406
AU - Springer,Mark S.
AU - Meredith,Robert William
AU - Gatesy,John
AU - Emerling,Christopher Allan
AU - Park,Jong
AU - Rabosky,Daniel
AU - Stadler,Tanja
AU - Steiner,Cynthia
AU - Ryder,Oliver A.
AU - Janecka,Jan
AU - Fisher,Colleen
AU - Murphy,William J.
T1 - Macroevolutionary Dynamics and Historical Biogeography of Primate Diversification Inferred from a Species Supermatrix
PY - 2012
KW - primate phylogeny; timetree; historical biogeography; diversification analyses; Grande Coupure
UR - http://dx.doi.org/
N2 - Phylogenetic relationships, divergence times, and patterns of biogeographic descent
among primate species are both complex and contentious. Here, we generate a robust
molecular phylogeny for 70 primate genera and 367 primate species based on a
concatenation of 69 nuclear gene segments and ten mitochondrial gene sequences.
Relaxed clock analyses of divergence times with 14 fossil-calibrated nodes suggest
that living Primates last shared a common ancestor 71-63 Ma, and that divergences
within both Strepsirrhini and Haplorhini are entirely post-Cretaceous. These results are
consistent with the hypothesis that the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction of nonavian
dinosaurs played an important role in the diversification of placental mammals.
Previous queries into primate historical biogeography have suggested Africa, Asia,
Europe, or North America as the ancestral area of crown primates, but were based on
methods that were coopted from phylogeny reconstruction. By contrast, we analyzed
our molecular phylogeny with two methods that were developed explicitly for ancestral
area reconstruction, and find support for the hypothesis that the most recent common
ancestor of living Primates resided in Asia. Analyses of primate macroevolutionary
dynamics provide support for a diversification rate increase in the late Miocene,
possibly in response to elevated global mean temperatures, and are consistent with
the fossil record. By contrast, diversification analyses failed to detect evidence for rateshift
changes near the Eocene-Oligocene boundary even though the fossil record
provides clear evidence for a major turnover event ("Grande Coupure") at this time.
Our results highlight the power and limitations of inferring diversification dynamics from
molecular phylogenies, as well as the sensitivity of diversification analyses to different
species concepts.
L3 -
JF - PLoS ONE
VL -
IS -
ER -