@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref23977,
author = {Liyuan Yang and Carlos A Machado and Xiao-Dong Dang and Yan-Qiong Peng and Da-Rong Yang and Wan-Jin Liao and Da-Yong Zhang},
title = {The incidence and pattern of co-pollinator diversification in dioecious and monoecious figs},
year = {2014},
keywords = {Ficus, fig-pollinating wasp, breeding system, host switching, co-speciation, host specificity},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {Evolution},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Differences in breeding system are associated with correlated ecological and morphological changes in plants. In Ficus, dioecy and monoecy are strongly associated with different suites of traits (tree height, population density, fruiting frequency, pollinator dispersal ecology). Although ~30% of fig species are pollinated by multiple species of fig-pollinating wasps it has been suggested that co-pollinators are rare in dioecious figs. Here we test whether there is a connection between fig breeding system and co-pollinator incidence and diversification by conducting a meta-analysis of molecular data from pollinators of 119 fig species that includes new data from 15 Asian fig species. We find that the incidence of co-pollinators is not significantly different between monoecious and dioecious Ficus, and while all co-pollinators in dioecious figs are sister taxa, only 32.1% in monoecious figs are sister taxa. We present hypotheses to explain those patterns and discuss their consequences on the evolution of this mutualism.}
}
Citation for Study 16785

Citation title:
"The incidence and pattern of co-pollinator diversification in dioecious and monoecious figs".

Study name:
"The incidence and pattern of co-pollinator diversification in dioecious and monoecious figs".

This study is part of submission 16785
(Status: Published).
Citation
Yang L., Machado C.A., Dang X., Peng Y., Yang D., Liao W., & Zhang D. 2014. The incidence and pattern of co-pollinator diversification in dioecious and monoecious figs. Evolution, .
Authors
-
Yang L.
-
Machado C.A.
-
Dang X.
-
Peng Y.
-
Yang D.
-
Liao W.
-
Zhang D.
Abstract
Differences in breeding system are associated with correlated ecological and morphological changes in plants. In Ficus, dioecy and monoecy are strongly associated with different suites of traits (tree height, population density, fruiting frequency, pollinator dispersal ecology). Although ~30% of fig species are pollinated by multiple species of fig-pollinating wasps it has been suggested that co-pollinators are rare in dioecious figs. Here we test whether there is a connection between fig breeding system and co-pollinator incidence and diversification by conducting a meta-analysis of molecular data from pollinators of 119 fig species that includes new data from 15 Asian fig species. We find that the incidence of co-pollinators is not significantly different between monoecious and dioecious Ficus, and while all co-pollinators in dioecious figs are sister taxa, only 32.1% in monoecious figs are sister taxa. We present hypotheses to explain those patterns and discuss their consequences on the evolution of this mutualism.
Keywords
Ficus, fig-pollinating wasp, breeding system, host switching, co-speciation, host specificity
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S16785
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref23977,
author = {Liyuan Yang and Carlos A Machado and Xiao-Dong Dang and Yan-Qiong Peng and Da-Rong Yang and Wan-Jin Liao and Da-Yong Zhang},
title = {The incidence and pattern of co-pollinator diversification in dioecious and monoecious figs},
year = {2014},
keywords = {Ficus, fig-pollinating wasp, breeding system, host switching, co-speciation, host specificity},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {Evolution},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Differences in breeding system are associated with correlated ecological and morphological changes in plants. In Ficus, dioecy and monoecy are strongly associated with different suites of traits (tree height, population density, fruiting frequency, pollinator dispersal ecology). Although ~30% of fig species are pollinated by multiple species of fig-pollinating wasps it has been suggested that co-pollinators are rare in dioecious figs. Here we test whether there is a connection between fig breeding system and co-pollinator incidence and diversification by conducting a meta-analysis of molecular data from pollinators of 119 fig species that includes new data from 15 Asian fig species. We find that the incidence of co-pollinators is not significantly different between monoecious and dioecious Ficus, and while all co-pollinators in dioecious figs are sister taxa, only 32.1% in monoecious figs are sister taxa. We present hypotheses to explain those patterns and discuss their consequences on the evolution of this mutualism.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 23977
AU - Yang,Liyuan
AU - Machado,Carlos A
AU - Dang,Xiao-Dong
AU - Peng,Yan-Qiong
AU - Yang,Da-Rong
AU - Liao,Wan-Jin
AU - Zhang,Da-Yong
T1 - The incidence and pattern of co-pollinator diversification in dioecious and monoecious figs
PY - 2014
KW - Ficus
KW - fig-pollinating wasp
KW - breeding system
KW - host switching
KW - co-speciation
KW - host specificity
UR - http://dx.doi.org/
N2 - Differences in breeding system are associated with correlated ecological and morphological changes in plants. In Ficus, dioecy and monoecy are strongly associated with different suites of traits (tree height, population density, fruiting frequency, pollinator dispersal ecology). Although ~30% of fig species are pollinated by multiple species of fig-pollinating wasps it has been suggested that co-pollinators are rare in dioecious figs. Here we test whether there is a connection between fig breeding system and co-pollinator incidence and diversification by conducting a meta-analysis of molecular data from pollinators of 119 fig species that includes new data from 15 Asian fig species. We find that the incidence of co-pollinators is not significantly different between monoecious and dioecious Ficus, and while all co-pollinators in dioecious figs are sister taxa, only 32.1% in monoecious figs are sister taxa. We present hypotheses to explain those patterns and discuss their consequences on the evolution of this mutualism.
L3 -
JF - Evolution
VL -
IS -
ER -