CiteULike

Delicious

Connotea

Citation for Study 1720

Citation title: "Evaluating alternative hypotheses for the early evolution and diversification of ants".

This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S1637 (Status: Published).

Citation

Brady S., Schultz T., Fisher B., & Ward P. 2006. Evaluating alternative hypotheses for the early evolution and diversification of ants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(48): 18172-18177.

Authors

• Brady S.
• Schultz T.
• Fisher B.
• Ward P.

Abstract

Ants are the world's most diverse and ecologically dominant eusocial organisms. Resolving the phylogeny and timescale for major ant lineages is vital to understanding how they achieved this success. Morphological, molecular, and paleontological studies, however, have presented conflicting views on early ant evolution. To address these issues, we generated the largest ant molecular phylogenetic data set published to date, containing ~6 kb of DNA sequence from 162 species representing all 20 ant subfamilies and 10 aculeate outgroup families. When these data are analyzed with and without outgroups, which are all distantly related to ants and hence long-branched, we obtain conflicting ingroup topologies for some early ant lineages. This result casts strong doubt on the existence of a poneroid clade as currently defined. We compare alternate attachments of the outgroups to the ingroup tree using likelihood tests, and find that several alternative rootings cannot be rejected by the data. These alternatives imply fundamentally different scenarios for the early evolution of ant morphology and behavior. Our data strongly support several novel relationships within the more derived formicoid ants, including placement of the enigmatic subfamily Aenictogitoninae as sister to Dorylus driver ants. We use the molecular data to estimate divergence times, employing a strategy distinct from previous work by incorporating the extensive fossil record of other aculeate Hymenoptera as well as that of ants. Our age estimates for the most recent common ancestor of extant ants range from approximately 115 to 135 million years ago, indicating that a Jurassic origin is highly unlikely.

Keywords

divergence dating, Formicidae, long-branch attraction, phylogeny

External links

• DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0605858103
• PMID: 17079492

About this resource

• Canonical resource URI: http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S1720
• Other versions: Nexus NeXML
• Show BibTeX reference

  		@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref14820,
  	 author = {Se?n G.  Brady and Ted R.  Schultz and Brian L.  Fisher and Philip S.  Ward},
  	 title = {Evaluating alternative hypotheses for the early evolution and diversification of ants},
  	 year = {2006},
  	 keywords = {divergence dating,  Formicidae, long-branch attraction, phylogeny},
  	 doi = {10.1073/pnas.0605858103},
  	 url = {},
  	 pmid = {17079492 },
  	 journal = {Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America},
  	 volume = {103},
  	 number = {48},
  	 pages = {18172--18177},
  	 abstract = {Ants are the world's most diverse and ecologically dominant eusocial organisms. Resolving the phylogeny and timescale for major ant lineages is vital to understanding how they achieved this success. Morphological, molecular, and paleontological studies, however, have presented conflicting views on early ant evolution. To address these issues, we generated the largest ant molecular phylogenetic data set published to date, containing ~6 kb of DNA sequence from 162 species representing all 20 ant subfamilies and 10 aculeate outgroup families. When these data are analyzed with and without outgroups, which are all distantly related to ants and hence long-branched, we obtain conflicting ingroup topologies for some early ant lineages. This result casts strong doubt on the existence of a poneroid clade as currently defined. We compare alternate attachments of the outgroups to the ingroup tree using likelihood tests, and find that several alternative rootings cannot be rejected by the data. These alternatives imply fundamentally different scenarios for the early evolution of ant morphology and behavior. Our data strongly support several novel relationships within the more derived formicoid ants, including placement of the enigmatic subfamily Aenictogitoninae as sister to Dorylus driver ants. We use the molecular data to estimate divergence times, employing a strategy distinct from previous work by incorporating the extensive fossil record of other aculeate Hymenoptera as well as that of ants. Our age estimates for the most recent common ancestor of extant ants range from approximately 115 to 135 million years ago, indicating that a Jurassic origin is highly unlikely.}
  }
  		

• Show RIS reference

  		TY  - JOUR
  ID  - 14820
  AU  - Brady,Se?n G. 
  AU  - Schultz,Ted R. 
  AU  - Fisher,Brian L. 
  AU  - Ward,Philip S. 
  T1  - Evaluating alternative hypotheses for the early evolution and diversification of ants
  PY  - 2006
  KW  - divergence dating
  KW  - Formicidae
  KW  - long-branch attraction
  KW  - phylogeny
  UR  - 
  N2  - Ants are the world's most diverse and ecologically dominant eusocial organisms. Resolving the phylogeny and timescale for major ant lineages is vital to understanding how they achieved this success. Morphological, molecular, and paleontological studies, however, have presented conflicting views on early ant evolution. To address these issues, we generated the largest ant molecular phylogenetic data set published to date, containing ~6 kb of DNA sequence from 162 species representing all 20 ant subfamilies and 10 aculeate outgroup families. When these data are analyzed with and without outgroups, which are all distantly related to ants and hence long-branched, we obtain conflicting ingroup topologies for some early ant lineages. This result casts strong doubt on the existence of a poneroid clade as currently defined. We compare alternate attachments of the outgroups to the ingroup tree using likelihood tests, and find that several alternative rootings cannot be rejected by the data. These alternatives imply fundamentally different scenarios for the early evolution of ant morphology and behavior. Our data strongly support several novel relationships within the more derived formicoid ants, including placement of the enigmatic subfamily Aenictogitoninae as sister to Dorylus driver ants. We use the molecular data to estimate divergence times, employing a strategy distinct from previous work by incorporating the extensive fossil record of other aculeate Hymenoptera as well as that of ants. Our age estimates for the most recent common ancestor of extant ants range from approximately 115 to 135 million years ago, indicating that a Jurassic origin is highly unlikely.
  L3  - 10.1073/pnas.0605858103
  JF  - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  VL  - 103
  IS  - 48
  SP  - 18172
  EP  - 18177
  ER  -