@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref29228,
author = {Alica Kosuthova and Martin Westberg and M. G. Otalora and Mats Wedin},
title = {Rostania revised ? testing generic delimitations in Collemataceae (Peltigerales, Lecanoromycetes)},
year = {2019},
keywords = {classification, cyanolichens, nomenclature, systematics, taxonomy, thallus anatomy},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {MycoKeys},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Here, we test the current generic delimitation of Rostania (Collemataceae, Peltigerales, Ascomycota) utilizing molecular phylogeny and morphological investigations. Using DNA sequence data from the mitochondrial SSU rDNA and two nuclear protein-coding genes (MCM7 and β-tubulin) and utilizing parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic methods, Rostania is shown to be non-monophyletic in the current sense. A new generic delimitation of Rostania is thus proposed, in which the genus is monophyletic, and three species (Rostania coccophylla, R. paramensis, R. quadrifida) are excluded and transferred to other genera. Rostania occultata is further non-monophyletic, and a more detailed investigation of species delimitations in Rostania s. str. is needed. The new combinations Leptogium paramense and Scytinium quadrifidum are proposed.}
}
Citation for Study 23889

Citation title:
"Rostania revised ? testing generic delimitations in Collemataceae (Peltigerales, Lecanoromycetes)".

Study name:
"Rostania revised ? testing generic delimitations in Collemataceae (Peltigerales, Lecanoromycetes)".

This study is part of submission 23889
(Status: Published).
Citation
Kosuthova A., Westberg M., Otalora M., & Wedin M. 2019. Rostania revised ? testing generic delimitations in Collemataceae (Peltigerales, Lecanoromycetes). MycoKeys, .
Authors
-
Kosuthova A.
(submitter)
+46725289595
-
Westberg M.
-
Otalora M.
-
Wedin M.
Abstract
Here, we test the current generic delimitation of Rostania (Collemataceae, Peltigerales, Ascomycota) utilizing molecular phylogeny and morphological investigations. Using DNA sequence data from the mitochondrial SSU rDNA and two nuclear protein-coding genes (MCM7 and β-tubulin) and utilizing parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic methods, Rostania is shown to be non-monophyletic in the current sense. A new generic delimitation of Rostania is thus proposed, in which the genus is monophyletic, and three species (Rostania coccophylla, R. paramensis, R. quadrifida) are excluded and transferred to other genera. Rostania occultata is further non-monophyletic, and a more detailed investigation of species delimitations in Rostania s. str. is needed. The new combinations Leptogium paramense and Scytinium quadrifidum are proposed.
Keywords
classification, cyanolichens, nomenclature, systematics, taxonomy, thallus anatomy
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S23889
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref29228,
author = {Alica Kosuthova and Martin Westberg and M. G. Otalora and Mats Wedin},
title = {Rostania revised ? testing generic delimitations in Collemataceae (Peltigerales, Lecanoromycetes)},
year = {2019},
keywords = {classification, cyanolichens, nomenclature, systematics, taxonomy, thallus anatomy},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {MycoKeys},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Here, we test the current generic delimitation of Rostania (Collemataceae, Peltigerales, Ascomycota) utilizing molecular phylogeny and morphological investigations. Using DNA sequence data from the mitochondrial SSU rDNA and two nuclear protein-coding genes (MCM7 and β-tubulin) and utilizing parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic methods, Rostania is shown to be non-monophyletic in the current sense. A new generic delimitation of Rostania is thus proposed, in which the genus is monophyletic, and three species (Rostania coccophylla, R. paramensis, R. quadrifida) are excluded and transferred to other genera. Rostania occultata is further non-monophyletic, and a more detailed investigation of species delimitations in Rostania s. str. is needed. The new combinations Leptogium paramense and Scytinium quadrifidum are proposed.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 29228
AU - Kosuthova,Alica
AU - Westberg,Martin
AU - Otalora,M. G.
AU - Wedin,Mats
T1 - Rostania revised ? testing generic delimitations in Collemataceae (Peltigerales, Lecanoromycetes)
PY - 2019
KW - classification
KW - cyanolichens
KW - nomenclature
KW - systematics
KW - taxonomy
KW - thallus anatomy
UR - http://dx.doi.org/
N2 - Here, we test the current generic delimitation of Rostania (Collemataceae, Peltigerales, Ascomycota) utilizing molecular phylogeny and morphological investigations. Using DNA sequence data from the mitochondrial SSU rDNA and two nuclear protein-coding genes (MCM7 and β-tubulin) and utilizing parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic methods, Rostania is shown to be non-monophyletic in the current sense. A new generic delimitation of Rostania is thus proposed, in which the genus is monophyletic, and three species (Rostania coccophylla, R. paramensis, R. quadrifida) are excluded and transferred to other genera. Rostania occultata is further non-monophyletic, and a more detailed investigation of species delimitations in Rostania s. str. is needed. The new combinations Leptogium paramense and Scytinium quadrifidum are proposed.
L3 -
JF - MycoKeys
VL -
IS -
ER -