@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref29518,
author = {Ishara Manawasinghe and Asha Janadaree Dissanayake and Xinghong Li and Mei Liu and Dhanushka Nadeeshan Wanasinghe and Jianping Xu and Wensheng Zhao and Wei Zhang and Yueyan Zhou and Kevin D Hyde and Siraprapa Brooks and JiYe Yan},
title = {High genetic diversity and species complexity of Diaporthe associated with grapevine dieback in China},
year = {2019},
keywords = {new species, new host record, network analysis, phylogeography, Phomopsis dieback},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {IMA Fungus},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Grapevine trunk diseases have become one of the main threats to grape production worldwide, with Diaporthe species as an emerging group of pathogens in China. At present, relatively little is known about the taxonomy and genetic diversity of Chinese Diaporthe populations, including their relationships to other populations worldwide. Here, we conducted an extensive field survey in six provinces in China to identify and characterise Diaporthe species in grape vineyards. Ninety-four isolates were identified and analysed using multi-locus phylogeny. The isolates belonged to eight species, including three novel taxa, D. guangxiensis D. hubeiensis, D. viniferae, and three new host records, D. gulyae D. pescicola and D. unshiuensis. The most commonly isolated species was D. eres. In addition, high genetic diversity was observed for D. eres in Chinese vineyards. Haplotype network analysis of D. eres isolates from China and Europe showed a close relationship between samples from the two geographical locations and evidence for recombination. In comparative pathogenicity testing, D. gulyae was the most aggressive taxon, whereas D. hubeiensis was the least aggressive. This study provides new insights into the Diaporthe species associated with grapevines in China, and our results can be used to develop effective disease management strategies.}
}
Citation for Study 24324

Citation title:
"High genetic diversity and species complexity of Diaporthe associated with grapevine dieback in China".

Study name:
"High genetic diversity and species complexity of Diaporthe associated with grapevine dieback in China".

This study is part of submission 24324
(Status: Published).
Citation
Manawasinghe I., Dissanayake A.J., Li X., Liu M., Wanasinghe D.N., Xu J., Zhao W., Zhang W., Zhou Y., Hyde K.D., Brooks S., & Yan J. 2019. High genetic diversity and species complexity of Diaporthe associated with grapevine dieback in China. IMA Fungus, .
Authors
-
Manawasinghe I.
(submitter)
-
Dissanayake A.J.
13552444052
-
Li X.
-
Liu M.
-
Wanasinghe D.N.
+66970637810
-
Xu J.
1-905-525-9140
-
Zhao W.
-
Zhang W.
-
Zhou Y.
-
Hyde K.D.
-
Brooks S.
-
Yan J.
Abstract
Grapevine trunk diseases have become one of the main threats to grape production worldwide, with Diaporthe species as an emerging group of pathogens in China. At present, relatively little is known about the taxonomy and genetic diversity of Chinese Diaporthe populations, including their relationships to other populations worldwide. Here, we conducted an extensive field survey in six provinces in China to identify and characterise Diaporthe species in grape vineyards. Ninety-four isolates were identified and analysed using multi-locus phylogeny. The isolates belonged to eight species, including three novel taxa, D. guangxiensis D. hubeiensis, D. viniferae, and three new host records, D. gulyae D. pescicola and D. unshiuensis. The most commonly isolated species was D. eres. In addition, high genetic diversity was observed for D. eres in Chinese vineyards. Haplotype network analysis of D. eres isolates from China and Europe showed a close relationship between samples from the two geographical locations and evidence for recombination. In comparative pathogenicity testing, D. gulyae was the most aggressive taxon, whereas D. hubeiensis was the least aggressive. This study provides new insights into the Diaporthe species associated with grapevines in China, and our results can be used to develop effective disease management strategies.
Keywords
new species, new host record, network analysis, phylogeography, Phomopsis dieback
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S24324
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref29518,
author = {Ishara Manawasinghe and Asha Janadaree Dissanayake and Xinghong Li and Mei Liu and Dhanushka Nadeeshan Wanasinghe and Jianping Xu and Wensheng Zhao and Wei Zhang and Yueyan Zhou and Kevin D Hyde and Siraprapa Brooks and JiYe Yan},
title = {High genetic diversity and species complexity of Diaporthe associated with grapevine dieback in China},
year = {2019},
keywords = {new species, new host record, network analysis, phylogeography, Phomopsis dieback},
doi = {},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {IMA Fungus},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {Grapevine trunk diseases have become one of the main threats to grape production worldwide, with Diaporthe species as an emerging group of pathogens in China. At present, relatively little is known about the taxonomy and genetic diversity of Chinese Diaporthe populations, including their relationships to other populations worldwide. Here, we conducted an extensive field survey in six provinces in China to identify and characterise Diaporthe species in grape vineyards. Ninety-four isolates were identified and analysed using multi-locus phylogeny. The isolates belonged to eight species, including three novel taxa, D. guangxiensis D. hubeiensis, D. viniferae, and three new host records, D. gulyae D. pescicola and D. unshiuensis. The most commonly isolated species was D. eres. In addition, high genetic diversity was observed for D. eres in Chinese vineyards. Haplotype network analysis of D. eres isolates from China and Europe showed a close relationship between samples from the two geographical locations and evidence for recombination. In comparative pathogenicity testing, D. gulyae was the most aggressive taxon, whereas D. hubeiensis was the least aggressive. This study provides new insights into the Diaporthe species associated with grapevines in China, and our results can be used to develop effective disease management strategies.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 29518
AU - Manawasinghe,Ishara
AU - Dissanayake,Asha Janadaree
AU - Li,Xinghong
AU - Liu,Mei
AU - Wanasinghe,Dhanushka Nadeeshan
AU - Xu,Jianping
AU - Zhao,Wensheng
AU - Zhang ,Wei
AU - Zhou ,Yueyan
AU - Hyde,Kevin D
AU - Brooks ,Siraprapa
AU - Yan,JiYe
T1 - High genetic diversity and species complexity of Diaporthe associated with grapevine dieback in China
PY - 2019
KW - new species
KW - new host record
KW - network analysis
KW - phylogeography
KW - Phomopsis dieback
UR - http://dx.doi.org/
N2 - Grapevine trunk diseases have become one of the main threats to grape production worldwide, with Diaporthe species as an emerging group of pathogens in China. At present, relatively little is known about the taxonomy and genetic diversity of Chinese Diaporthe populations, including their relationships to other populations worldwide. Here, we conducted an extensive field survey in six provinces in China to identify and characterise Diaporthe species in grape vineyards. Ninety-four isolates were identified and analysed using multi-locus phylogeny. The isolates belonged to eight species, including three novel taxa, D. guangxiensis D. hubeiensis, D. viniferae, and three new host records, D. gulyae D. pescicola and D. unshiuensis. The most commonly isolated species was D. eres. In addition, high genetic diversity was observed for D. eres in Chinese vineyards. Haplotype network analysis of D. eres isolates from China and Europe showed a close relationship between samples from the two geographical locations and evidence for recombination. In comparative pathogenicity testing, D. gulyae was the most aggressive taxon, whereas D. hubeiensis was the least aggressive. This study provides new insights into the Diaporthe species associated with grapevines in China, and our results can be used to develop effective disease management strategies.
L3 -
JF - IMA Fungus
VL -
IS -
ER -