@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref16342,
author = {J. H. Li and A. Linn Bogle and Michael J Donoghue},
title = {Phylogenetic relationships in the Hamamelidoideae inferred from sequences of trn non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA.},
year = {1999},
keywords = {Hamamelidoideae; Hamamelidaceae; phylogeny; chloroplast DNA; trnL-trnF intergenic spacer; trnL intron},
doi = {},
url = {http://www.phylodiversity.net/donoghue/publications/MJD_papers/1999/088_Li_HarvPapBot99.pdf},
pmid = {},
journal = {Harvard Papers in Botany},
volume = {4},
number = {},
pages = {343--356},
abstract = {Two non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA were used to examine phylogenetic relationships in the Hamamelidoideae (Hamamelidaceae). Sequences of trnL-trnF intergenic spacer and trnL intron were informative in resolving relationships among genera and at higher levels. Three major lineages are identified: the Corylopsis lineage, the Trichocladus lineage, and the Hamamelis lineage. Corylopsideae, Hamamelideae, and Dicoryphinae are found to be monophyletic; Loropetalinae and Eustigmateae appear to be paraphyletic, and Hamamelideae and Fothergilleae to be polyphyletic. These results are consistent with previous analyses based on nrDNA ITS sequences and the cpDNA matK gene. Morphological characters, such as apetaly, strap-shaped petal, and wind pollination, which have been used to define suprageneric groups, evolved independently in the three lineages.}
}
Citation for Study 567
Citation title:
"Phylogenetic relationships in the Hamamelidoideae inferred from sequences of trn non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA.".
This study was previously identified under the legacy study ID S391
(Status: Published).
Citation
Li J., Bogle A., & Donoghue M.J. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships in the Hamamelidoideae inferred from sequences of trn non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Harvard Papers in Botany, 4: 343-356.
Authors
-
Li J.
-
Bogle A.
-
Donoghue M.J.
Abstract
Two non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA were used to examine phylogenetic relationships in the Hamamelidoideae (Hamamelidaceae). Sequences of trnL-trnF intergenic spacer and trnL intron were informative in resolving relationships among genera and at higher levels. Three major lineages are identified: the Corylopsis lineage, the Trichocladus lineage, and the Hamamelis lineage. Corylopsideae, Hamamelideae, and Dicoryphinae are found to be monophyletic; Loropetalinae and Eustigmateae appear to be paraphyletic, and Hamamelideae and Fothergilleae to be polyphyletic. These results are consistent with previous analyses based on nrDNA ITS sequences and the cpDNA matK gene. Morphological characters, such as apetaly, strap-shaped petal, and wind pollination, which have been used to define suprageneric groups, evolved independently in the three lineages.
Keywords
Hamamelidoideae; Hamamelidaceae; phylogeny; chloroplast DNA; trnL-trnF intergenic spacer; trnL intron
External links
About this resource
- Canonical resource URI:
http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S567
- Other versions:
Nexus
NeXML
- Show BibTeX reference
@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref16342,
author = {J. H. Li and A. Linn Bogle and Michael J Donoghue},
title = {Phylogenetic relationships in the Hamamelidoideae inferred from sequences of trn non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA.},
year = {1999},
keywords = {Hamamelidoideae; Hamamelidaceae; phylogeny; chloroplast DNA; trnL-trnF intergenic spacer; trnL intron},
doi = {},
url = {http://www.phylodiversity.net/donoghue/publications/MJD_papers/1999/088_Li_HarvPapBot99.pdf},
pmid = {},
journal = {Harvard Papers in Botany},
volume = {4},
number = {},
pages = {343--356},
abstract = {Two non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA were used to examine phylogenetic relationships in the Hamamelidoideae (Hamamelidaceae). Sequences of trnL-trnF intergenic spacer and trnL intron were informative in resolving relationships among genera and at higher levels. Three major lineages are identified: the Corylopsis lineage, the Trichocladus lineage, and the Hamamelis lineage. Corylopsideae, Hamamelideae, and Dicoryphinae are found to be monophyletic; Loropetalinae and Eustigmateae appear to be paraphyletic, and Hamamelideae and Fothergilleae to be polyphyletic. These results are consistent with previous analyses based on nrDNA ITS sequences and the cpDNA matK gene. Morphological characters, such as apetaly, strap-shaped petal, and wind pollination, which have been used to define suprageneric groups, evolved independently in the three lineages.}
}
- Show RIS reference
TY - JOUR
ID - 16342
AU - Li,J. H.
AU - Bogle,A. Linn
AU - Donoghue,Michael J
T1 - Phylogenetic relationships in the Hamamelidoideae inferred from sequences of trn non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA.
PY - 1999
KW - Hamamelidoideae; Hamamelidaceae; phylogeny; chloroplast DNA; trnL-trnF intergenic spacer; trnL intron
UR - http://www.phylodiversity.net/donoghue/publications/MJD_papers/1999/088_Li_HarvPapBot99.pdf
N2 - Two non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA were used to examine phylogenetic relationships in the Hamamelidoideae (Hamamelidaceae). Sequences of trnL-trnF intergenic spacer and trnL intron were informative in resolving relationships among genera and at higher levels. Three major lineages are identified: the Corylopsis lineage, the Trichocladus lineage, and the Hamamelis lineage. Corylopsideae, Hamamelideae, and Dicoryphinae are found to be monophyletic; Loropetalinae and Eustigmateae appear to be paraphyletic, and Hamamelideae and Fothergilleae to be polyphyletic. These results are consistent with previous analyses based on nrDNA ITS sequences and the cpDNA matK gene. Morphological characters, such as apetaly, strap-shaped petal, and wind pollination, which have been used to define suprageneric groups, evolved independently in the three lineages.
L3 -
JF - Harvard Papers in Botany
VL - 4
IS -
SP - 343
EP - 356
ER -
Go to search
Citation
Taxa
Matrices
Trees
Analyses
