@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref18861,
author = {Martin Ryberg and Mathias Andreasen and Robert G Bj?rk},
title = {Weak habitat specificity in ectomycorrhizal communities associated with Salix herbacea and Salix polaris in alpine tundra},
year = {2010},
keywords = {Alpine ? Arctic - Ectomycorrhiza ? Environmental gradient ? Exploration types - Salix},
doi = {10.1007/s00572-010-0335-1},
url = {http://},
pmid = {},
journal = {Mycorrhiza},
volume = {},
number = {},
pages = {},
abstract = {This study explores mid-alpine ectomycorrhizal communities on Salix herbacea and S. polaris in plant communities differing in nutrient status and snow conditions. Plant species were identified by tracking roots back to above ground structures while fungal species were identified using molecular methods. The fungi were identified to 34 molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs)/species but species accumulation curves indicated that the communities were only partially sampled. The estimated total species richness was 49 (?9 SD) MOTUs/species. No significant ectomycorrhizal community specificity was found between the two plant species and only weak specificity between different plant communities. Furthermore, no difference in proportion of colonized root tips could be demonstrated between plant communities. However, some fungal taxa showed tendencies to associate with specific environmental conditions. Sebacinaceae, Inocybe egenula, Russula cf. emetica, and a Tomentella sp. were found in meadow communities but not in the heath communities. Sistotrema cf. alboluteum and Tomentella cf. terrestris were only found in the dry and mesic heath communities. Classifications into exploration types showed that the contact type is more abundant in the dry heath community than the other communities. Cenococcum geophilum was the most common species but Cortinarius spp., Russula spp., Tomentella spp., and Lactarius spp. were also common. This study confirms that alpine communities are rich in ectomycorrhizal fungi including species from a wide variety of fungal lineages and also show that many dominant species have wide ecological amplitude.}
}
Taxa for tree 25310 of Study 10400

Citation title:
"Weak habitat specificity in ectomycorrhizal communities associated with Salix herbacea and Salix polaris in alpine tundra".

Study name:
"Weak habitat specificity in ectomycorrhizal communities associated with Salix herbacea and Salix polaris in alpine tundra".

This study is part of submission 10390
(Status: Published).
Taxa
Return to complete tree view
| ID |
Taxon Label |
NCBI taxid |
uBIO namebankID |
| 420738 |
Cenococcum Plate3 A8 |
|
|
| 420721 |
Cenococcum Plate3 C7 |
|
|
| 420732 |
Cenococcum Plate3 G10 |
|
|
| 420705 |
Cenococcum Plate5 A11 |
|
|
| 420733 |
Cenococcum Plate5 A7 |
|
|
| 420714 |
Cenococcum Plate5 B1 |
|
|
| 420718 |
Cenococcum Plate5 B5 |
|
|
| 420700 |
Cenococcum Plate5 C10 |
|
|
| 420744 |
Cenococcum Plate5 C11 |
|
|
| 420729 |
Cenococcum Plate5 D10 |
|
|
| 420739 |
Cenococcum Plate5 E2 |
|
|
| 420711 |
Cenococcum Plate5 E3 |
|
|
| 420703 |
Cenococcum Plate5 E9 |
|
|
| 420734 |
Cenococcum Plate5 F7 |
|
|
| 420710 |
Cenococcum Plate5 G1 |
|
|
| 420702 |
Cenococcum Plate5 H2 |
|
|
| 420730 |
Cenococcum Plate5 H8 |
|
|
| 420694 |
Cenococcum geophilum AB089816 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420724 |
Cenococcum geophilum AJ510274 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420740 |
Cenococcum geophilum AM084698 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420696 |
Cenococcum geophilum AY112935 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420725 |
Cenococcum geophilum AY394913 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420709 |
Cenococcum geophilum AY394919 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420695 |
Cenococcum geophilum AY818610a |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420715 |
Cenococcum geophilum AY818610b |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420735 |
Cenococcum geophilum AY880936 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420693 |
Cenococcum geophilum AY940649 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420746 |
Cenococcum geophilum DQ474338 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420716 |
Cenococcum geophilum DQ474346 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420737 |
Cenococcum geophilum DQ474352 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420698 |
Cenococcum geophilum DQ474365 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420701 |
Cenococcum geophilum DQ474382 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420736 |
Cenococcum geophilum DQ474383 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420727 |
Cenococcum geophilum EF559264 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420708 |
Cenococcum geophilum EU057125 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420731 |
Cenococcum geophilum EU057125.2 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420728 |
Cenococcum geophilum EU346870 |
5570
|
3104726
|
| 420745 |
Uncultured AJ633599 |
|
|
| 420723 |
Uncultured AY299214 |
|
|
| 420697 |
Uncultured AY587279 |
|
|
| 420722 |
Uncultured Cenococcum FJ152539 |
|
|
| 420699 |
Uncultured DQ474343 |
|
|
| 420717 |
Uncultured DQ474377 |
|
|
| 420713 |
Uncultured DQ474382 |
|
|
| 420692 |
Uncultured EF559264 |
|
|
| 420719 |
Uncultured EU046048 |
|
|
| 420741 |
Uncultured EU057079.2 |
|
|
| 420720 |
Uncultured EU668305 |
|
|
| 420712 |
Uncultured FM202949 |
|
|
| 420726 |
Uncultured FM203000 |
|
|
| 420742 |
Uncultured FM203000.1 |
|
|
| 420704 |
Uncultured dothideomycete AM161511 |
|
|
| 420743 |
Uncultured dothideomycete DQ273296 |
|
|
| 420707 |
Uncultured dothideomycete DQ273310 |
|
|
| 420706 |
Uncultured dothideomycete DQ273316 |
|
|