@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref27489, author = {Marco Oct?vio de Oliveira Pellegrini and David R. Hunt and Rafaela Campostrini Forzza and Cassia Monica Sakuragui}, title = {Morphological phylogeny of Tradescantia L. (Commelinaceae) sheds light on a new infrageneric classification and taxonomic novelties in subtribe Tradescantiinae}, year = {2017}, keywords = {Commelinaceae, Tradescantia, Gibasis, Elasis, Callisia, Tripogandra, Tradescantiinae}, doi = {}, url = {http://}, pmid = {}, journal = {Phytokeys}, volume = {}, number = {}, pages = {}, abstract = {Throughout the years, three infrageneric classifications were proposed for Tradescantia along with several informal groups and species complexes. The current infrageneric classification accepts 12 sections ? with T. sect. Tradescantia being further divided into four series ?, and assimilates many concepts adopted by previous authors. Recent molecular-based phylogenetic studies indicate that the currently accepted sections might not represent monophyletic lineages within Tradescantia. Based on newly gathered morphological data on the group, complemented with available micromorphological, cytological and phytochemical data, we present the first morphological based evolutionary hypothesis for Tradescantia. Furthermore, we reduced subtribe Thyrsantheminae to a synonym of subtribe Tradescantiinae, and propose a new infrageneric classification for Tradescantia, based on the total evidence of our morphological phylogeny, combined to the previously published molecular data.} }

• Go to search
• Citation
• Taxa
• Matrices
• Trees
• Analyses
• 

CiteULike

Delicious

Connotea