TreeBASE Search-Trees for study 11235

@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref19493, author = {Ulf Jondelius and Andreas Wallberg and Matthew Hooge and Olga I Raikova}, title = {How the Worm Got its Pharynx: Phylogeny, Classification and Bayesian assessment of Character Evolution in Acoela}, year = {2011}, keywords = {Acoela, phylogeny, classification, character evolution, Bayesian inference}, doi = {10.1093/sysbio/syr073}, url = {http://}, pmid = {}, journal = {Systematic Biology}, volume = {60}, number = {6}, pages = {845--871}, abstract = {Acoela are marine microscopic worms currently thought to be the sister taxon of all other bilaterians. Acoels have long been used as models in evolutionary scenarios, and generalized conclusions about acoel and bilaterian ancestral features are frequently drawn from studies of single acoel species. There is no extensive phylogenetic study of Acoela and the taxonomy of the 380 species is chaotic. Here we use two nuclear ribosomal genes and one mitochondrial gene in combination with 37 morphological characters in an analysis of 126 acoel terminals (about one third of the described species) to estimate the phylogeny and character evolution of Acoela. We present an estimate of posterior probabilities for ancestral character states at 31 control nodes in the phylogeny. The overall reconstruction signal based on the shape of the posterior distribution of character states was computed for all morphological characters and control nodes to assess how well these were reconstructed. The body-wall musculature appears more clearly reconstructed than the reproductive organs. Posterior similarity to the root was calculated by averaging the divergence between the posterior distributions at the nodes and the root over all morphological characters. Diopisthoporidae is the sister group to all other acoels and has the highest posterior similarity to the root. Convolutidae, including several ?model? acoels, is most divergent. Finally, we present a phylogenetic classification of Acoela down to the family level where six previous family level taxa are synonymized.} }

Delicious

Connotea

Trees for Study 11235

Citation title: "How the Worm Got its Pharynx: Phylogeny, Classification and Bayesian assessment of Character Evolution in Acoela".

Study name: "How the Worm Got its Pharynx: Phylogeny, Classification and Bayesian assessment of Character Evolution in Acoela".

This study is part of submission 11225 (Status: Published).

Trees

ID	Tree Label	Tree Title	Tree Type	Tree Kind	Taxa
Tr27644	18S 28S COI non structural unfiltered MrBayes 4x8chains 10Mgen	Acoela	Consensus	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr27646	18S 28S COI non structural unfiltered TNT 500reps Majrule	Acoela	Single	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr27649	18S 28S COI structural filtered RAxML 500reps Majrule Filtered	Acoela	Consensus	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr27648	18S 28S COI structural filtered MrBayes 4x8chains 10Mgen.tre	Acoela	Consensus	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr27645	18S 28S COI non structural unfiltered RAxML 500reps Majrule	Acoela	Single	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr27651	18S 28S COI structural unfiltered RAxML 500reps Majrule	Acoela	Consensus	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr27641	18S 28S COI non structural unfiltered Additional outgroups RAxML 500reps	Acoela	Single	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr27650	18S 28S COI structural unfiltered MrBayes 4x8chains 10Mgen	Acoela	Consensus	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr27643	18S 28S COI non structural filtered RAxML 500reps Majrule Filtered	Acoela	Single	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr27642	18S 28S COI non structural filtered MrBayes 4x8chains 10Mgen Filtered	Acoela	Consensus	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr27647	Morphology 18S 28S COI non structural unfiltered MrBayes 2x8chains 10Mgen	Acoela	Consensus	Species Tree	View Taxa