TreeBASE Search-Trees for study 21537

@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref27865, author = {Sandra Isabel Rodrigues Videira and Johannes (Ewald) Zacharias Groenewald and Chiharu Nakashima and Uwe Braun and Robert W. Barreto and Pierre J.G.M. De Wit and Pedro W. Crous}, title = {Mycosphaerellaceae - Chaos or clarity?}, year = {2017}, keywords = {Multi-gene phylogeny, Mycosphaerella, Plant pathogen, Taxonomy}, doi = {10.1016/j.simyco.2017.09.003}, url = {http://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2017.09.003}, pmid = {}, journal = {Studies in Mycology }, volume = {87}, number = {}, pages = {257--421}, abstract = {The Mycosphaerellaceae represent thousands of fungal species that are associated with diseases on a wide range of plant hosts. Understanding and stabilising the taxonomy of genera and species of Mycosphaerellaceae is therefore of the utmost importance given their impact on agriculture, horticulture and forestry. Based on previous molecular studies, several phylogenetic and morphologically distinct genera within the Mycosphaerellaceae have been delimited. In this study a multigene phylogenetic analysis (LSU, ITS and rpb2) was performed based on 415 isolates representing 297 taxa and incorporating ex-type strains where available. The main aim of this study was to resolve the phylogenetic relationships among the genera currently recognised within the family, and to clarify the position of the cercosporoid fungi among them. Based on these results many well-known genera are shown to be paraphyletic, with several synapomorphic characters that have evolved more than once within the family. As a consequence, several old generic names including Cercosporidium, Fulvia, Mycovellosiella, Phaeoramularia and Raghnildiana are resurrected, and 32 additional genera are described as new. Based on phylogenetic data 120 genera are now accepted within the family, but many currently accepted cercosporoid genera still remain unresolved pending fresh collections and DNA data. The present study provides a phylogenetic framework for future taxonomic work within the Mycosphaerellaceae.} }

Delicious

Connotea

Trees for Study 21537

Citation title: "Mycosphaerellaceae - Chaos or clarity?".

Study name: "Mycosphaerellaceae - Chaos or clarity?".

This study is part of submission 21537 (Status: Published).

Trees

ID	Tree Label	Tree Title	Tree Type	Tree Kind	Taxa
Tr108343	Fig. 2 published Bayesian tree	Tr108343	Single	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr108348	Fig. 3 unpublished RAxML tree	Tr108348	Single	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr108344	Fig. 2 unpublished strict consensus parsimony tree	Tr108344	Consensus	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr108346	Fig. 3 published Bayesian tree	Tr108346	Single	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr108342	Fig. 1 unpublished RAxML tree	Tr108342	Single	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr108352	Fig. 5 published Bayesian tree	Tr108352	Single	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr108340	Fig. 1	Mycosphaerellaceae published Bayesian tree	Single	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr108350	Fig. 4 unpublished strict consensus parsimony tree	Tr108350	Consensus	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr108349	Fig. 4	Mycosphaerellaceae published Bayesian tree	Single	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr108351	Fig. 4 unpublished RAxML tree	Tr108351	Single	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr108341	Fig. 1 unpublished strict consensus parsimony tree	Tr108341	Consensus	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr108345	Fig. 2 unpublished RAxML tree	Tr108345	Single	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr108353	Fig. 5 unpublished strict consensus parsimony tree	Tr108353	Consensus	Species Tree	View Taxa
Tr108347	Fig. 3 unpublished strict consensus parsimony tree	Tr108347	Consensus	Species Tree	View Taxa