CiteULike

Delicious

Connotea

Citation for Study 21537

Citation title: "Mycosphaerellaceae - Chaos or clarity?".

Study name: "Mycosphaerellaceae - Chaos or clarity?".

This study is part of submission 21537 (Status: Published).

Citation

Videira S.I., Groenewald J.Z., Nakashima C., Braun U., Barreto R.W., De wit P.J., & Crous P.W. 2017. Mycosphaerellaceae - Chaos or clarity?. Studies in Mycology , 87: 257-421.

Authors

• Videira S.I.
• Groenewald J.Z. (submitter) +31302122600
• Nakashima C. +81-59-231-9638
• Braun U.
• Barreto R.W.
• De wit P.J.
• Crous P.W.

Abstract

The Mycosphaerellaceae represent thousands of fungal species that are associated with diseases on a wide range of plant hosts. Understanding and stabilising the taxonomy of genera and species of Mycosphaerellaceae is therefore of the utmost importance given their impact on agriculture, horticulture and forestry. Based on previous molecular studies, several phylogenetic and morphologically distinct genera within the Mycosphaerellaceae have been delimited. In this study a multigene phylogenetic analysis (LSU, ITS and rpb2) was performed based on 415 isolates representing 297 taxa and incorporating ex-type strains where available. The main aim of this study was to resolve the phylogenetic relationships among the genera currently recognised within the family, and to clarify the position of the cercosporoid fungi among them. Based on these results many well-known genera are shown to be paraphyletic, with several synapomorphic characters that have evolved more than once within the family. As a consequence, several old generic names including Cercosporidium, Fulvia, Mycovellosiella, Phaeoramularia and Raghnildiana are resurrected, and 32 additional genera are described as new. Based on phylogenetic data 120 genera are now accepted within the family, but many currently accepted cercosporoid genera still remain unresolved pending fresh collections and DNA data. The present study provides a phylogenetic framework for future taxonomic work within the Mycosphaerellaceae.

Keywords

Multi-gene phylogeny, Mycosphaerella, Plant pathogen, Taxonomy

External links

• DOI: 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.09.003
• Other URL: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2017.09.003

About this resource

• Canonical resource URI: http://purl.org/phylo/treebase/phylows/study/TB2:S21537
• Other versions: Nexus NeXML
• Show BibTeX reference

  		@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref27865,
  	 author = {Sandra Isabel Rodrigues Videira and  Johannes (Ewald) Zacharias Groenewald and Chiharu  Nakashima and Uwe  Braun and Robert W. Barreto and Pierre J.G.M. De Wit and Pedro W. Crous},
  	 title = {Mycosphaerellaceae - Chaos or clarity?},
  	 year = {2017},
  	 keywords = {Multi-gene phylogeny, Mycosphaerella, Plant pathogen, Taxonomy},
  	 doi = {10.1016/j.simyco.2017.09.003},
  	 url = {http://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2017.09.003},
  	 pmid = {},
  	 journal = {Studies in Mycology },
  	 volume = {87},
  	 number = {},
  	 pages = {257--421},
  	 abstract = {The Mycosphaerellaceae represent thousands of fungal species that are associated with diseases on a wide range of plant hosts. Understanding and stabilising the taxonomy of genera and species of Mycosphaerellaceae is therefore of the utmost importance given their impact on agriculture, horticulture and forestry. Based on previous molecular studies, several phylogenetic and morphologically distinct genera within the Mycosphaerellaceae have been delimited. In this study a multigene phylogenetic analysis (LSU, ITS and rpb2) was performed based on 415 isolates representing 297 taxa and incorporating ex-type strains where available. The main aim of this study was to resolve the phylogenetic relationships among the genera currently recognised within the family, and to clarify the position of the cercosporoid fungi among them. Based on these results many well-known genera are shown to be paraphyletic, with several synapomorphic characters that have evolved more than once within the family. As a consequence, several old generic names including Cercosporidium, Fulvia, Mycovellosiella, Phaeoramularia and Raghnildiana are resurrected, and 32 additional genera are described as new. Based on phylogenetic data 120 genera are now accepted within the family, but many currently accepted cercosporoid genera still remain unresolved pending fresh collections and DNA data. The present study provides a phylogenetic framework for future taxonomic work within the Mycosphaerellaceae.}
  }
  		

• Show RIS reference

  		TY  - JOUR
  ID  - 27865
  AU  - Videira,Sandra Isabel Rodrigues
  AU  - Groenewald, Johannes (Ewald) Zacharias
  AU  - Nakashima,Chiharu 
  AU  - Braun,Uwe 
  AU  - Barreto,Robert W.
  AU  - De Wit,Pierre J.G.M.
  AU  - Crous,Pedro W.
  T1  - Mycosphaerellaceae - Chaos or clarity?
  PY  - 2017
  KW  - Multi-gene phylogeny
  KW  - Mycosphaerella
  KW  - Plant pathogen
  KW  - Taxonomy
  UR  - http://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2017.09.003
  N2  - The Mycosphaerellaceae represent thousands of fungal species that are associated with diseases on a wide range of plant hosts. Understanding and stabilising the taxonomy of genera and species of Mycosphaerellaceae is therefore of the utmost importance given their impact on agriculture, horticulture and forestry. Based on previous molecular studies, several phylogenetic and morphologically distinct genera within the Mycosphaerellaceae have been delimited. In this study a multigene phylogenetic analysis (LSU, ITS and rpb2) was performed based on 415 isolates representing 297 taxa and incorporating ex-type strains where available. The main aim of this study was to resolve the phylogenetic relationships among the genera currently recognised within the family, and to clarify the position of the cercosporoid fungi among them. Based on these results many well-known genera are shown to be paraphyletic, with several synapomorphic characters that have evolved more than once within the family. As a consequence, several old generic names including Cercosporidium, Fulvia, Mycovellosiella, Phaeoramularia and Raghnildiana are resurrected, and 32 additional genera are described as new. Based on phylogenetic data 120 genera are now accepted within the family, but many currently accepted cercosporoid genera still remain unresolved pending fresh collections and DNA data. The present study provides a phylogenetic framework for future taxonomic work within the Mycosphaerellaceae.
  L3  - 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.09.003
  JF  - Studies in Mycology 
  VL  - 87
  IS  - 
  SP  - 257
  EP  - 421
  ER  -