@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref31676,
author = {Wu Zhang and Johannes (Ewald) Zacharias Groenewald and Lorenzo Lombard and Rene K. Schumacher and Alan John Lander Phillips and Pedro W. Crous},
title = {Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales},
year = {2021},
keywords = {Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST); canker and leaf spot pathogens; new taxa; systematics},
doi = {10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.03},
url = {http://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.03},
pmid = {},
journal = {Persoonia},
volume = {46},
number = {},
pages = {63--115},
abstract = {The Botryosphaeriales (Dothideomycetes) includes numerous endophytic, saprobic, and plant pathogenic species associated with a wide range of symptoms, most commonly on woody plants. In a recent phylogenetic treatment of 499 isolates in the culture collection (CBS) of the Westerdijk Institute, we evaluated the families and genera accommodated in this order of important fungi. The present study presents multigene phylogenetic analyses for an additional 230 isolates, using ITS, tef1, tub2, LSU and rpb2 loci, in combination with morphological data. Based on these data, 58 species are reduced to synonymy, and eight novel species are described. They include Diplodia afrocarpi (Afrocarpus, South Africa), Dothiorella diospyricola (Diospyros, South Africa), Lasiodiplodia acaciae (Acacia, Indonesia), Neofusicoccum podocarpi (Podocarpus, South Africa), N. rapaneae (Rapanea, South Africa), Phaeobotryon ulmi (Ulmus, Germany), Saccharata grevilleae (Grevillea, Australia) and S. hakeiphila (Hakea, Australia). The results have clarified the identity of numerous isolates that lacked Latin binomials or had been deposited under incorrect names in the CBS collection in the past. They also provide a solid foundation for more in-depth future studies on taxa in the order. Sequences of the tef1, tub2 and rpb2 genes proved to be the most reliable markers. At the species level, results showed that the most informative genes were inconsistent, but that a combination of four candidate barcodes (ITS, tef1, tub2 and rpb2) provided reliable resolution. Furthermore, given the large number of additional isolates included in this study, and newly generated multigene DNA datasets, several species could also be reduced to synonymy. The study illustrates the value of reassessing the identity of older collections in culture collections utilising modern taxonomic frameworks and methods.}
}
Taxa for matrix 57879 of Study 27596

Citation title:
"Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales".

Study name:
"Evaluating species in Botryosphaeriales".

This study is part of submission 27596
(Status: Published).
Taxa
Return to matrix row view
ID |
Taxon Label |
NCBI taxid |
uBIO namebankID |
4352789 |
Botryosphaeria dothidea CBS 115476 |
|
|
4353340 |
Neofusicoccum cordaticola CBS 123634 |
|
|
4353439 |
Neofusicoccum cordaticola CBS 123635 |
|
|
4353326 |
Neofusicoccum grevilleae CBS 129518 |
|
|
4353370 |
Neofusicoccum hongkongense CERC 2967 |
|
|
4353353 |
Neofusicoccum hongkongense CERC 2968 |
|
|
4353330 |
Neofusicoccum hongkongense CERC 2973 |
|
|
4353436 |
Neofusicoccum kwambonambiense CBS 115184 |
|
|
4353269 |
Neofusicoccum kwambonambiense CBS 123639 |
|
|
4353335 |
Neofusicoccum kwambonambiense CBS 123641 |
|
|
4353284 |
Neofusicoccum occulatum CBS 128008 |
|
|
4353408 |
Neofusicoccum occulatum CPC 32162 |
|
|
4353405 |
Neofusicoccum occulatum MUCC 286 |
|
|
4353268 |
Neofusicoccum parvum BOT113 |
310453
|
9730069
|
4353391 |
Neofusicoccum parvum BOT136 |
310453
|
9730069
|
4353416 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CBS 112879 |
|
|
4353306 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CBS 112931 |
|
|
4353262 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CBS 117923 |
|
|
4353253 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CBS 130994 |
|
|
4353375 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CBS 130995 |
|
|
4353414 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CBS 133503 |
|
|
4353310 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CBS 139671 |
|
|
4353345 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CBS 139672 |
|
|
4353300 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CBS 139673 |
|
|
4353386 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CBS 140887 |
|
|
4353336 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CBS 161.29 |
|
|
4353358 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CBS 371.79 |
|
|
4353255 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CMW 9080 |
|
|
4353328 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CMW 9081 |
|
|
4353288 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CMW9071 |
310453
|
9730069
|
4353412 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CPC 32275 |
|
|
4353384 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CPC 34760 |
|
|
4353293 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CPC 34761 |
|
|
4353406 |
Neofusicoccum parvum CPC 35861 |
|
|
4353387 |
Neofusicoccum parvum EFA 470 |
|
|
4353302 |
Neofusicoccum parvum was algeriense CBS 119937 |
|
|
4353423 |
Neofusicoccum parvum was italicum CBS 719.85 |
|
|
4353296 |
Neofusicoccum parvum was pandanicola CBS 118832 |
|
|
4353378 |
Neofusicoccum parvum was pandanicola CCF109 |
|
|
4353286 |
Neofusicoccum parvum was pandanicola CERC 3509 |
|
|
4353327 |
Neofusicoccum parvum was pandanicola CMW14087 |
|
|
4353324 |
Neofusicoccum podocarpi CBS 115065 |
|
|
4353447 |
Neofusicoccum podocarpi CBS 131677 |
|
|
4353424 |
Neofusicoccum podocarpi CBS 131678 |
|
|
4353395 |
Neofusicoccum podocarpi CPC 32265 |
|
|
4353273 |
Neofusicoccum podocarpi NpAaBR |
|
|
4353303 |
Neofusicoccum ribis CBS 114306 |
|
|
4353305 |
Neofusicoccum ribis CBS 115475 |
|
|
4353264 |
Neofusicoccum ribis CBS 117915 |
|
|
4353259 |
Neofusicoccum ribis CBS 121.26 |
|
|
4353338 |
Neofusicoccum ribis CBS 122553 |
|
|
4353390 |
Neofusicoccum ribis was batangarum CBS 124923 |
|
|
4353275 |
Neofusicoccum ribis was batangarum CBS 124924 |
|
|
4353398 |
Neofusicoccum ribis was batangarum CPC 29624 |
|
|
4353311 |
Neofusicoccum ribis was batangarum CPC 29625 |
|
|
4353407 |
Neofusicoccum ribis was umdonicola CBS 118822 |
|
|
4353325 |
Neofusicoccum ribis was umdonicola CBS 123645 |
|
|
4353443 |
Neofusicoccum ribis was umdonicola CBS 123646 |
|
|
4353445 |
Neofusicoccum ribis was umdonicola CPC 29626 |
|
|
4353321 |
Neofusicoccum sinoeucalypti CERC 2005 |
|
|
4353453 |
Neofusicoccum sinoeucalypti CERC 3415 |
|
|