TreeBASE Search-Matrices for study 11235

@ARTICLE{TreeBASE2Ref19493, author = {Ulf Jondelius and Andreas Wallberg and Matthew Hooge and Olga I Raikova}, title = {How the Worm Got its Pharynx: Phylogeny, Classification and Bayesian assessment of Character Evolution in Acoela}, year = {2011}, keywords = {Acoela, phylogeny, classification, character evolution, Bayesian inference}, doi = {10.1093/sysbio/syr073}, url = {http://}, pmid = {}, journal = {Systematic Biology}, volume = {60}, number = {6}, pages = {845--871}, abstract = {Acoela are marine microscopic worms currently thought to be the sister taxon of all other bilaterians. Acoels have long been used as models in evolutionary scenarios, and generalized conclusions about acoel and bilaterian ancestral features are frequently drawn from studies of single acoel species. There is no extensive phylogenetic study of Acoela and the taxonomy of the 380 species is chaotic. Here we use two nuclear ribosomal genes and one mitochondrial gene in combination with 37 morphological characters in an analysis of 126 acoel terminals (about one third of the described species) to estimate the phylogeny and character evolution of Acoela. We present an estimate of posterior probabilities for ancestral character states at 31 control nodes in the phylogeny. The overall reconstruction signal based on the shape of the posterior distribution of character states was computed for all morphological characters and control nodes to assess how well these were reconstructed. The body-wall musculature appears more clearly reconstructed than the reproductive organs. Posterior similarity to the root was calculated by averaging the divergence between the posterior distributions at the nodes and the root over all morphological characters. Diopisthoporidae is the sister group to all other acoels and has the highest posterior similarity to the root. Convolutidae, including several ?model? acoels, is most divergent. Finally, we present a phylogenetic classification of Acoela down to the family level where six previous family level taxa are synonymized.} }

Delicious

Connotea

Matrices for Study 11235

Citation title: "How the Worm Got its Pharynx: Phylogeny, Classification and Bayesian assessment of Character Evolution in Acoela".

Study name: "How the Worm Got its Pharynx: Phylogeny, Classification and Bayesian assessment of Character Evolution in Acoela".

This study is part of submission 11225 (Status: Published).

Matrices

ID	Matrix Title	Description	Data type	NTAX	NCHAR	Taxa
M7863	18S + 28S + COI, Structural & unfiltered		Nucleic Acid	129	8380	View Taxa
M7860	18S + 28S + COI, Non-structural & unfiltered	The non-structural versions of the datasets were aligned with the g-INS-i algorithms in MAFFT	Nucleic Acid	129	7688	View Taxa
M7858	18S + 28S + COI, Non-structural & unfiltered	This dataset contains sequence data from many outgroup taxa.	Nucleic Acid	143	7919	View Taxa
M7859	18S + 28S + COI, Non-structural & filtered	Aliscore was used to filter out hypervariable regions from the ribosomal alignments	Nucleic Acid	129	5175	View Taxa
M7861	18S + 28S + COI + Morphology, Non-structural & unfiltered	This dataset includes the morphological datamatrix analyzed in the study	Unspecified	104	7732	View Taxa
M7862	18S + 28S + COI, Structural & filtered	The structural versions of the datasets were aligned with the q-INS-i algorithms in MAFFT	Nucleic Acid	129	5270	View Taxa